Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bernard-Wentz Scholarship Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$75k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$473kYouth Development$1k
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k25 grants · $64k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$2,240
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY$11,200
UNIVERSITY OF AKRON$8,960
KENT STATE UNIVERSITY$7,840
KENT STATE UNIVERSITY TUSCARAWAS$6,720
OHIO UNIVERSITY$6,720
UNIVERSITY OF MOUNT UNION$3,360
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY$2,240
COLLEGE OF WOOSTER$2,240
WALSH UNIVERSITY$2,240
OHIO NORTHERN UNIVERSITY$2,240
ASHLAND UNIVERSITY$2,240
UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI$2,240
MALONE UNIVERSITY$2,240
CLEMSON UNIVERSITY$1,120
YOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY$1,120
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WAYNESBURG UNIVERSITY: $1k → 13%FASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $1k → 17%ANDERSON UNIVERSITY: $1k → 15%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $1k → 16%JACKSON COLLEGE: $1k → 13%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 16%CEDARVILLE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 9%COLLEGE OF WOOSTER: $2k → 10%ASHLAND UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%KENT STATE UNIVERSITY TUSCARAWAS: $7k → 12%MIAMI UNIVERSITY: $1k → 12%HIRAM COLLEGE: $1k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF AKRON: $9k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MOUNT UNION: $3k → 13%OHIO NORTHERN UNIVERSITY: $2k → 15%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $11k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI: $2k → 16%JOHN CARROLL UNIVERSITY: $1k → 17%YOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 19%OHIO UNIVERSITY: $7k → 22%WEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY: $1k → 15%WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY: $2k → 19%MALONE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 13%OHIO NORTHERN UNIVERSITY: $1k → 15%WALSH UNIVERSITY: $2k → 13%STARK STATE COLLEGE: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
IN
OH
PA
UT
WV
SC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$347k · 26 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
15

Total granted

$347k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+13%

Still filing today

50%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Mount Union
    5× · 2021–2025 · $15k · revenue +16%
  • THE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER
    5× · 2021–2025 · $8k · revenue +4%
  • MU
    MALONE UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $6k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • BY
    BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • AU
    ASHBURY UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • UO
    University of Dayton
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Otterbein University

Otterbein University is an inclusive community dedicated to educating the whole person in the context of humane values. Our mission is to prepare graduates to think deeply and broadly, to engage locally and globally, and to advance their…

Education
5
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
6
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
7
University of Rio Grande

The university of rio grande/ rio grande community college is america's unique private/public institution of higher education designed to provide learners the opportunity to attain a high-quality, high-value education. our personalized,…

Education
8
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education
9
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
10
Nebraska Wesleyan University

Nebraska wesleyan university is an academic community dedicated to intellectual and personal growth within the context of a liberal arts education and in an environment of christian concern.

Education
11
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
12
Taylor University

The mission of Taylor University is to develop servant-leaders marked with a passion to minister Christ's redemptive love, grace, and truth to a world in need.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ohio Northern University; the most unlike its peers is Burr Oak 4-H Club - Michigan State. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY: $71,903 · OtherKENT STATE UNIVERSITYOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $45,838 · OtherOHIO STATE UNIVERSITYOHIO UNIVERSITY: $43,114 · OtherOHIO UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF AKRON: $36,588 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF AKRONUNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI: $16,704 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATIKENT STATE UNIVERSITY TUSCARAWAS: $14,520 · OtherTHE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $11,200 · Other+22 more: $56,974 · Other+22 moreWalsh University Inc: $17,850 · EducationWalsh University IncUniversity of Mount Union: $15,057 · EducationUniversity of Mount UnionTHE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER: $7,928 · EducationTHE COLLEGE OF WOOSTERMALONE UNIVERSITY: $6,307 · EducationMALONE UNIVERSITYOhio Northern University: $6,140 · EducationOhio Northern UniversityMount Vernon Nazarene University: $4,709 · EducationJohn Carroll University: $4,208 · EducationGROVE CITY COLLEGE: $4,067 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF EVANSVILLE: $3,720 · EducationASHLAND UNIVERSITY: $3,540 · EducationCAPITAL UNIVERSITY: $3,088 · Education+8 more: $13,256 · Education+8 moreBurr Oak 4-H Club - Michigan State: $1,120 · Youth Development
Other$296,841Education$89,870Youth Development$1,120

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWalsh University Inc: $17,850 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Mount Union: $15,057 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER: $7,928 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMALONE UNIVERSITY: $6,307 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOhio Northern University: $6,140 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMount Vernon Nazarene University: $4,709 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJohn Carroll University: $4,208 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGROVE CITY COLLEGE: $4,067 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF EVANSVILLE: $3,720 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetASHLAND UNIVERSITY: $3,540 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL UNIVERSITY: $3,088 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANDERSON UNIVERSITY: $2,420 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCedarville University: $2,420 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Dayton: $1,621 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMarietta College: $1,621 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $1,467 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTiffin University: $1,467 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAYNESBURG UNIVERSITY: $1,120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIRAM COLLEGE: $1,120 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Walsh University Inc ↗
  • Who funds University of Mount Union ↗
  • Who funds THE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER ↗
  • Who funds MALONE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Ohio Northern University ↗
  • Who funds Mount Vernon Nazarene University ↗
  • Who funds John Carroll University ↗
  • Who funds GROVE CITY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF EVANSVILLE ↗
  • Who funds ASHLAND UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ANDERSON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Cedarville University ↗
  • Who funds University of Dayton ↗
  • Who funds Marietta College ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds Tiffin University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Paul and Carol David FoundationOH17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Paul and Carol David Foundation · Council of Independent Colleges · Premier Bank Foundation · Eberly Da & Tb Scholarship Ta · John Q Shunk Association · Fw Albrecht Family Foundation · The Ohio Foundation of Independent Colleges · Charles Koch Foundation · Stark Community Foundation · Folds of Honor Foundation · Columbus Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bernard-Wentz Scholarship Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bernard-Wentz Scholarship Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bernard-Wentz Scholarship’s filings →

    More from the funding graph