Skip to content

California · Private foundation

Bernard Silver & Betty Silver

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$65k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
5
Grants FY2025
6
Organizations funded FY2024
33%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$5,275
Largest grant, FY2025
$50,000
Organizations funded a year
4 to 15
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$905k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 33% of the organizations Bernard Silver & Betty Silver funded were first-time grantees, receiving 15% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving5$65k20%
FY20246$101k33%
FY20237$94k43%
FY20228$68k63%
FY20214$61k50%
FY20206$78k33%
FY20198$55k38%
FY201815$61k53%
99% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$298kAnimals$155kReligion$65kHuman Services$51kHealth$47kEducation$18kRecreation & Sports$18kPublic Safety & Disaster$14kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MA
CA
UT
MO
KY
DC
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 13 grantees

Plus 33 recipients with no EIN on record ($487k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Bernard Silver & Betty Silver supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCoachella Valley Mounted Rangers: $98,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetNarrow Door: $40,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetFellowship of Christian Athletes: $13,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGirl Scouts of Greater Los Angeles: $10,275 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHeavenly Horse Haven Inc: $7,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetRiverpark Center Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBargains Thrift Shop Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetOperation Safe House Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCoachella Valley Rescue Mission: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOwensboro Health Foundation Inc: $1,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCorner of Love Ministries: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 12.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC7.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Bernard Silver & Betty Silver with peer funders

About Bernard Silver & Betty Silver

How much does Bernard Silver & Betty Silver give?
Bernard Silver & Betty Silver reported 5 grants totaling $65,225 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 15 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Bernard Silver & Betty Silver fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Youth Development (43%), Animals (23%), Religion (9%).
Who are Bernard Silver & Betty Silver's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Coachella Valley Mounted Rangers ($98k), Narrow Door ($40k), Fellowship of Christian Athletes ($13k).
Does Bernard Silver & Betty Silver fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 33% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Bernard Silver & Betty Silver accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Bernard Silver & Betty Silver?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Network for Good, The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc, American Online Giving Foundation Inc.
Where is Bernard Silver & Betty Silver based?
Bernard Silver & Betty Silver is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bernard Silver & Betty Silver’s filings →

More from the funding graph