Skip to content
Bernard Osher Jewish Philanthropies at a glance

· Public charity

Bernard Osher Jewish Philanthropies

The foundation operates exclusively for charitable, educational or religious purposes by conducting or supporting activities for the benefit of, or to carry out the purposes of the jewish community federation of san francisco, the peninsula, marin and sonoma counties.

$626k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$1.7MArts & Culture$501kHuman Services$350kInternational$345kEmployment$230kReligion$145kEducation$95kCivil Rights$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $580k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION$200,000
JEWISH FILM INSTITUTE$150,000
JEWISH VOCATIONAL & CAREER COUNSELING SERVICE$130,116
THE BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$50,000
OSHER MARIN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$50,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO$25,000
BERKELEY HILLEL$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $250k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OSHER MARIN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $50k → 8%INSTITUTE ON AGING: $50k → 10%OSHER MARIN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $50k → 8%INSTITUTE ON AGING: $50k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $25k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $25k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 13 repeat orgs$345k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
10

Total granted

$1.4M
$345k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+50%

Still filing today

100%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalHuman ServicesEducationCivil RightsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JV
    JEWISH VOCATIONAL & CAREER COUNSELING SERVICE
    2× · 2017–2025 · $230k · revenue +13%
  • IO
    INSTITUTE ON AGING
    2× · 2017–2018 · $100k · revenue +121%
  • BO
    BERNARD OSHER MARIN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER
    2× · 2024–2025 · $100k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • TA
    The American Himalayan Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $75k · revenue -42%
  • TC
    THE CONTEMPORARY JEWISH MUSEUM
    one grant, 2017 · $75k · revenue -68%
  • AF
    American Friends of Tel Aviv Univgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $70k · revenue +50%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Federation of the Sacra

To serve and enrich the Jewish community and those who support and identify with it, in the greater Sacramento area, Israel, and the world.

Philanthropy
2
University of Judaism Foundation
—
3
Sandler Foundation

The foundation operates exclusively for charitable, educational or religious purposes by conducting or supporting activities for the benefit of, or to carry out the purposes of the jewish community federation of san francisco, the…

Philanthropy
4
Jewish Childrens Museum

To further jewish historical education among youths

Arts & Culture
5
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
6
Jewish Federation of San Diego County

Jewish federation of san diego county is dedicated to building a vibrant, caring, connected, and enduring jewish community.

—
7
Jewish Community Foundation of the West

To enhance charitable giving; facilitate philanthropy both locally and worldwide; and build permanent financial resources to strengthen organizations and programs that serve the Jewish families of Northern California

Philanthropy
8
The Jewish Studio Project

Through thought leadership, community programs, leadership development, and organizational partnerships, jsp is building a movement to activate the creative power of the jewish community.

Religion
9
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
10
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
11
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
12
Jews of Color Initiative

The Jews of Color Initiatives mission is to advance racial equity in the U.S. Jewish community by centering the leadership of Jews of Color and ensuring that our communities and institutions reflect the multiracial reality of the Jewish…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma; the most unlike its peers is Institute On Aging. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
13/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA: $1,705,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSU…Jewish Film Institute: $310,000 · Arts & CultureJewish Film Inst…THE CONTEMPORARY JEWISH MUSEUM: $75,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CONTEMPORARY…Maine Jewish Film Festival: $55,617 · Arts & CultureMaine Jewish Fil…TREE OF LIFE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $35,000 · Arts & Culture+3 moreJEWISH VOCATIONAL & CAREER COUNSELING SERVICE: $230,116 · OtherJEWISH VOCATIO…Bay Area Jewish Healing Center: $100,000 · OtherBay Area Jewis…BERKELEY HILLEL: $60,000 · OtherBERKELEY HILLE…ARCHBISHOP RIORDAN HIGH SCHOOL: $25,000 · OtherARCHBISHOP RIO…SAN FRANCISCO FREE CLINIC: $20,000 · Other+1 more: $10,000 · OtherBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $200,000 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT …The American Himalayan Foundation: $75,000 · InternationalThe America…American Friends of Tel Aviv Univ: $70,000 · InternationalAmerican Fr…INSTITUTE ON AGING: $100,000 · Human ServicesBERNARD OSHER MARIN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $100,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $50,000 · Human ServicesSan Francisco Jewish Community Publications Inc: $70,000 · EducationAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $30,000 · Civil RightsREBOOT INC: $25,000 · Religion
Philanthropy$1,705,000Arts & Culture$500,617Other$445,116International$345,000Human Services$250,000Education$120,000Civil Rights$30,000Religion$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA: $1,705,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetJewish Film Institute: $310,000 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetJEWISH VOCATIONAL & CAREER COUNSELING SERVICE: $230,116 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBay Area Jewish Healing Center: $100,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetINSTITUTE ON AGING: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBERNARD OSHER MARIN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $100,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CONTEMPORARY JEWISH MUSEUM: $75,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAmerican Friends of Tel Aviv Univ: $70,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSan Francisco Jewish Community Publications Inc: $70,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetBERKELEY HILLEL: $60,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetMaine Jewish Film Festival: $55,617 over 4y, 9.5% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREBOOT INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTREE OF LIFE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FREE CLINIC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMAGNES MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetSan Francisco Performances Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Fede…Koret FoundationJohn Pritzker Family …Lisa & Douglas Goldma…Alexander M & June L …Howard and Irene Levi…The San Francisco Fou…Lisa Stone Pritzker F…Ralph & Marsha Guggen…The Shimon Ben Joseph…Marin Community Found…Silicon Valley Commun…
Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & SonomaCA26.9× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Koret Foundation · John Pritzker Family Fund · Lisa & Douglas Goldman Fund · Alexander M & June L Maisin Foundation · Howard and Irene Levine Family Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Lisa Stone Pritzker Family Fund · Ralph & Marsha Guggenheim Family Foundation · The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bernard Osher Jewish Philanthropies funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bernard Osher Jewish Philanthropies. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bernard Osher Jewish Philanthropies’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home