Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bernard J and Camille Cebelak Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$650k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$3.1MHuman Services$1.5MEducation$967kHousing & Shelter$925kInternational$666kCivil Rights$600kFood & Nutrition$281kHealth$150kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k4 grants · $400k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ACTS XXIX$250,000
ALPHA WOMEN'S CENTER$200,000
CHRISTMAS OUTREACH OF ISABELLA COUNTY$100,000
REACH THE FORGOTTEN JAIL MINISTRY$50,000
ST THOMAS THE APOSTLE$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%ENNIS CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $100k → 16%ST VINCENT AND SARAH FISHER CENTER: $10k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.0M · 21 repeat orgs$631k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +95% since the first grant, against +49% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
18

Total granted

$8.0M
$631k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+95%
+49%

Still filing today

57%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthReligionEducationInternationalFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AX
    ACTS XXIX - Mobilizing for Mission
    7× · 2019–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +128% · 27% of their budget
  • MT
    MEL TROTTER MINISTRIES
    6× · 2018–2023 · $600k · revenue +136%
  • AI
    Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty
    6× · 2018–2024 · $600k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • AR
    AMAZON RELIEFgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $101k · revenue +31%
  • HP
    HELP Pregnancy Crisis Aid Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -44%
  • EC
    ENNIS CENTER FOR CHILDREN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +92%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County

Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County D/B/A Catholic Charities Washtenaw County provides diverse, holistic social services including adoption and pregnancy counseling, food and basic needs assistance, domestic and child abuse…

2
Faith Works Michigan

Provide volunteers to assist people in need (such as widows) and organizations in need (such as churches) with repairs and maintenance of homes and buildings.

Human Services
3
Catholic Human Services Inc

Catholic human services inc. enhances the lives of those we serve by providing hope-filled social, emotional and spiritual support to all people.

Human Services
4
Rescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan

Expressing God's love by reaching out to the hurting and homeless of the Great Lakes Bay Region by providing shelter and care, proclaiming the Gospel of Christ, and establishing Christian disciples among disadvantaged people.

Housing & Shelter
5
Detroit Rescue Mission Ministries
Health
6
St Vincent Catholic Charities

The mission of the St. Vincent Catholic Charities is the work of the Catholic Church to share the love of Christ by performing corporal and spiritual works of Mercy.

7
Isabella Community Soup Kitchen

Provide meals for the needy in isabella county, michigan.

8
Franciscan Ministries Inc

Create positive change in the lives of those we serve.

Human Services
9
Christian Services Love Inc of Greater Lansing

Christian Services serves as a resource center and clearinghouse matching resources of over 200 Lansing, MI area churches to needs from local indigent people. Coordination of Thanksgiving food baskets, clothes closets, and transitional…

Human Services
10
Midland's Open Door

Midland's Open Door (MOD) operates two crisis shelters, one for women and children and one for men. MOD's programs are designed to meet the immediate needs of homeless individuals by providing a safe and loving environment where each…

11
Christian Community Response Team

Catholic Community Response Team provides direct support and referral services to those in crisis needing emergency assistance to meet their basic needs. We do it in a manner inspired by the Gospel of Jesus. Our focus is to keep families…

Human Services
12
Mariners Inn

To provide 24-hour residential substance abuse treatment for adult homeless men in a professional, compassionate, and therapeutic environment conducive to reducing drug and alcohol addiction and promoting their return to health,…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mel Trotter Ministries and the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr14%14%5–10yr18%23%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr13%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr14%41%5–10yr18%14%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr13%13%35–55yr13%19%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/24
the rest of the field
16%
2,203/13,556

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ALPHA WOMEN'S CENTER — $925,000 · OtherALPHA WOMEN'S CENTERMEL TROTTER MINISTRIES — $600,000 · OtherMEL TROTTER MINISTRIESCENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY — $300,000 · OtherCENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITYSACRED HEART PARISH — $300,000 · OtherSACRED HEART PARISHCATHOLIC CENTRAL HIGHSCHOOL — $266,782 · OtherCATHOLIC CENTRAL HIGHSCHOOLST THOMAS THE APOSTLE — $259,200 · OtherST THOMAS THE APOSTLEANGELS OF ACTION INC — $276,000 · OtherANGELS OF ACTION INCFORGOTTEN MAN MINISTRIES — $185,000 · Other+19 more — $695,000 · Other+19 moreACTS XXIX - Mobilizing for Mission — $2,100,000 · ReligionACTS XXIX - Mobilizing for Mi…Faith Weavers of St Mary — $173,125 · ReligionFaith Weavers of St MaryHOPE FOR HAITI INC — $565,000 · InternationalAMAZON RELIEF — $101,000 · InternationalActon Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty — $600,000 · Civil RightsHARMEL ACADEMY OF THE TRADES — $400,000 · EducationBLANDFORD NATURE CENTER — $140,000 · EducationCHRISTMAS OUTREACH OF ISABELLA COUNTY — $300,000 · Human ServicesENNIS CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesWILLIAM AND JANET STRICKLER NONPROFIT CENTER — $50,000 · Human Services+1 more — $10,000 · Human ServicesHospitality In the Name of Christ — $325,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$3,806,982Religion$2,273,125International$666,000Civil Rights$600,000Education$540,000Human Services$460,000Housing & Shelter$325,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetACTS XXIX - Mobilizing for Mission — $2,100,000 over 7y, 27% of budgetMEL TROTTER MINISTRIES — $600,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetActon Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty — $600,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetHOPE FOR HAITI INC — $565,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetHARMEL ACADEMY OF THE TRADES — $400,000 over 5y, 16% of budgetHospitality In the Name of Christ — $325,000 over 6y, 65% of budgetCHRISTMAS OUTREACH OF ISABELLA COUNTY — $300,000 over 5y, 91% of budgetANGELS OF ACTION INC — $276,000 over 7y, 26% of budgetFORGOTTEN MAN MINISTRIES — $185,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetFaith Weavers of St Mary — $173,125 over 4y, 30% of budgetBLANDFORD NATURE CENTER — $140,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetHELP Pregnancy Crisis Aid Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetENNIS CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC — $100,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWILLIAM AND JANET STRICKLER NONPROFIT CENTER — $50,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetCATHERINES HEALTH CENTER — $30,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST MICHIGAN — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJOHN BALL ZOO — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN DYSLEXIA INSTITUTE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetST VINCENT & SARAH FISHER CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ACTS XXIX - Mobilizing for Mission
  • Who funds MEL TROTTER MINISTRIES
  • Who funds Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty
  • Who funds HOPE FOR HAITI INC
  • Who funds HARMEL ACADEMY OF THE TRADES
  • Who funds Hospitality In the Name of Christ
  • Who funds CHRISTMAS OUTREACH OF ISABELLA COUNTY
  • Who funds ANGELS OF ACTION INC
  • Who funds FORGOTTEN MAN MINISTRIES
  • Who funds Faith Weavers of St Mary
  • Who funds BLANDFORD NATURE CENTER
  • Who funds AMAZON RELIEF
  • Who funds HELP Pregnancy Crisis Aid Inc
  • Who funds ENNIS CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds WILLIAM AND JANET STRICKLER NONPROFIT CENTER
  • Who funds CATHERINES HEALTH CENTER
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST MICHIGAN
  • Who funds ADELANTE NYC INC
  • Who funds JOHN BALL ZOO
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds MICHIGAN DYSLEXIA INSTITUTE INC
  • Who funds ST VINCENT & SARAH FISHER CENTER
  • Who funds ST LEOS SOUP KITCHEN

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Grand Rapids Community FoundationMI17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Peter C & Emajean Cook Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bernard J and Camille Cebelak Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Hope for Haiti Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Bernard J and Camille Cebelak Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Bernard J and Camille Cebelak Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph