Skip to content

Michigan · Private foundation

Bernard J and Camille Cebelak Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$650k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
5
Grants FY2025
15
Organizations funded FY2024
20%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$100,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$250,000
Organizations funded a year
12 to 19
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$6.8M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 20% of the organizations Bernard J and Camille Cebelak Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 8% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $125k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthInternationalEducationFood & NutritionReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving5$650k0%
FY202415$1.5M20%
FY202315$1.2M0%
FY202216$1.5M6%
FY202117$1.2M24%
FY202012$720k17%
FY201916$1.2M50%
FY201819$687k95%
97% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$3.1MHuman Services$1.5MEducation$967kHousing & Shelter$925kInternational$666kCivil Rights$600kFood & Nutrition$281kHealth$150kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
ACTS XXIX - Mobilizing for Mission$2,100,000727%
Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty$600,00062%
Mel Trotter Ministries$600,00061%
Hope for Haiti Inc$565,00051%
Harmel Academy of the Trades$400,000516%
Hospitality In the Name of Christ$325,000665%
Christmas Outreach of Isabella County$300,000591%
Central Michigan University$300,0004n/a
Angels of Action Inc$276,000726%
Forgotten Man Ministries$185,00052%
Show all 24 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 15 recipients with no EIN on record ($2.2M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Bernard J and Camille Cebelak Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 5 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 20 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetACTS XXIX - Mobilizing for Mission: $2,100,000 over 7y, 27% of budgetActon Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty: $600,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetMel Trotter Ministries: $600,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetHope for Haiti Inc: $565,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetHarmel Academy of the Trades: $400,000 over 5y, 16% of budgetHospitality In the Name of Christ: $325,000 over 6y, 65% of budgetChristmas Outreach of Isabella County: $300,000 over 5y, 91% of budgetAngels of Action Inc: $276,000 over 7y, 26% of budgetForgotten Man Ministries: $185,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetFaith Weavers of St Mary: $173,125 over 4y, 30% of budgetBlandford Nature Center: $140,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetHELP Pregnancy Crisis Aid Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetEnnis Center for Children Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWilliam and Janet Strickler Nonprofit Center: $50,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetCatherines Health Center: $30,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetJohn Ball Zoo: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCatholic Charities West Michigan: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSt Vincent & Sarah Fisher Center: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMichigan Dyslexia Institute Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetBlood Cancer United Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 20.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Grand Rapids Community FoundationMI17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Peter C & Emajean Cook Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Bernard J and Camille Cebelak Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Bernard J and Camille Cebelak Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Bernard J and Camille Cebelak Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Bernard J and Camille Cebelak Foundation

How much does Bernard J and Camille Cebelak Foundation give?
Bernard J and Camille Cebelak Foundation reported 5 grants totaling $650,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 12 and 19 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Bernard J and Camille Cebelak Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Religion (36%), Human Services (17%), Education (11%).
Who are Bernard J and Camille Cebelak Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: ACTS XXIX - Mobilizing for Mission ($2.1M), Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty ($600k), Mel Trotter Ministries ($600k).
Does Bernard J and Camille Cebelak Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 20% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Bernard J and Camille Cebelak Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Bernard J and Camille Cebelak Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Grand Rapids Community Foundation, Peter C & Emajean Cook Foundation, Consumers Energy Foundation.
Where is Bernard J and Camille Cebelak Foundation based?
Bernard J and Camille Cebelak Foundation is based in MI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bernard J and Camille Cebelak’s filings →

More from the funding graph