Skip to content

· Private foundation

Berkeley Pilgrimage Foundation % Satellite

Its FY2020 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$210k
Granted FY2020
10
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2020.

Human Services$140kHousing & Shelter$65kCrime & Legal$45kHealth$40kYouth Development$40kMembership Benefit$20kFood & Nutrition$13kPhilanthropy$13k
02FY2020 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
J-SEI$25,000
Youth Spirit Artworks$25,000
Alzheimers Services of the East Bay$25,000
Satellite Affordable Housing Associates$25,000
St Mary's Center$25,000
EveryOne Home$25,000
Family Bridges$25,000
Berkeley Meals on Wheels$12,500
East Bay Community Foundation$12,500
SCORE East Bay Chapter #506$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%J-SEI: $25k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$190k · 4 repeat orgs$173k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +86% since the first grant, against +59% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2020, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
2

Total granted

$190k
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+86%
+59%

Still filing today

50%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $113k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20
Crime & LegalYouth DevelopmentHealthHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    ST MARY'S CENTER
    2× · 2019–2020 · $90k · revenue +86%
  • YS
    YOUTH SPIRIT ARTWORKS
    2× · 2019–2020 · $40k · revenue +14%
  • EH
    EveryOne Home
    2× · 2019–2020 · $40k

Funded once

  • LA
    LEGAL ASSISTANCE FOR SENIORS
    one grant, 2019 · $45k · revenue +18%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVINGgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +59%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bay Area Community Services Housing Corp

Improve the quality of life for individuals in Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Solano County, Monterey County, Sacramento County and the surrounding area in the State of California.

Housing & Shelter
2
Alameda County Homeless Action Center

HAC assists homeless and mentally ill clients in the long and difficult process of becoming eligible for SSI and MediCal benefits. HAC provides assistance with other public benefits that clients need in the interim to survive until their…

Housing & Shelter
3
Asian Health Services

Asian Health Services (AHS) provides a continuum of medical care, mental health care, dental care and other healthcare services for all, including health education; perinatal services; behavioral health; family and youth services;…

Health
4
Legal Assistance to the Elderly

LAE's mission is to protect and advance the right of San Franciscos seniors and adults with disabilities to be housed, healthy, financially stable, and safe. We provide free legal services to San Francisco seniors and adults with…

Crime & Legal
5
Silicon Valley Independent Living Center

SVILC builds disability identity, culture, pride, creating opportunities for personal and community transformation, and partnering with others to ensure that civil and human rights are protected.

Human Services
6
Serra Residential Center Inc

To provide dignity, respect and choice for persons with developmental disabilities

—
7
San Francisco Ladies Protection and Relief Society
Health
8
Council on Aging Services for Seniors

To enhance the quality of life for our aging community by providing services that promote wellbeing and maintain independence.

—
9
Curry Senior Center

To provide services to seniors that promote independent living while maintaining their dignity and self-esteem.

Human Services
10
San Francisco Senior and Disability Action Dba Senior & Disability Action

Senior & Disability Action educates and mobilizes seniors and people with disabilities to secure individual rights and social justice. We work together to create a city and world in which seniors and people with disabilities can live well…

Unclassified
11
Korean Community Center of the East Bay

The mission of KCCEB is to empower the Korean American and other communities of the Bay Area through education, advocacy, service and the development of community-based resources.

—
12
East Bay Services to the Developmentally Disabled

To assist those we serve to get in touch with their own Goodness, Dignity and Unlimited Potential. Our Services will Nurture and Affirm the capacity for growth that will be expressed in unique and individual ways.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is J-Sei Inc; the most unlike its peers is Youth Spirit Artworks. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MARY'S CENTER: $90,000 · OtherST MARY'S CENTEREveryOne Home: $40,000 · OtherEveryOne HomeFAMILY BRIDGES INC: $25,000 · OtherFAMILY BRIDGES INCSCORE East Bay Chapter 506: $20,000 · OtherSCORE East Bay Chapter 506CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $15,000 · OtherCENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVINGBerkeley Meals on Wheels: $12,500 · OtherBerkeley Meals on WheelsLEGAL ASSISTANCE FOR SENIORS: $45,000 · Crime & LegalLEGAL ASSISTA…YOUTH SPIRIT ARTWORKS: $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTH SPIRIT…Alzheimers Services of the East Bay: $25,000 · HealthSatellite Affordable Housing Associates: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterJ-SEI INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesEAST BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $12,500 · Philanthropy
Other$202,500Crime & Legal$45,000Youth Development$40,000Health$25,000Housing & Shelter$25,000Human Services$25,000Philanthropy$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST MARY'S CENTER: $90,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetLEGAL ASSISTANCE FOR SENIORS: $45,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetAlzheimers Services of the East Bay: $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFAMILY BRIDGES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSatellite Affordable Housing Associates: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJ-SEI INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEAST BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco FoundationCA21× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · East Bay Foundation on Aging · Senior Assistance Foundation Eastbay · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Berkeley Pilgrimage Foundation % Satellite funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Berkeley Pilgrimage Foundation % Satellite. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Berkeley Pilgrimage Foundation % Satellite?

    Find your warmest path to Berkeley Pilgrimage Foundation % Satellite through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Berkeley Pilgrimage Foundation % Satellite’s filings →

    More from the funding graph