Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bergstein Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$133k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$312kHuman Services$179kEducation$145kArts & Culture$108kInternational$99kPhilanthropy$45kCrime & Legal$38kYouth Development$26kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $95k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BFF MYELOMA GIFT FUND$30,000
INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$10,000
GLENCOLE PUBLIC LIBRARY$10,000
US HOLOCAUST MUSEUM (USHMM)$10,000
JEWISH BOARD OF CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES$10,000
Individual grant recipient$9,000
AIEF$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
FIDF$5,000
AFINS$3,500
NORGE SKI CLUB$3,000
FOOD RESCUE INSTITUION$2,500
CHEMISTRY OF LIFE PROCESS$1,000
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $58k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BAND OF PARENTS: $1k → 18%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $15k → 14%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $15k → 14%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $10k → 14%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $5k → 14%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $5k → 14%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $5k → 14%SHARE OUR SPARE: $1k → 14%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$635k · 22 repeat orgs$336k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
39

Total granted

$635k
$270k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+20%

Still filing today

27%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $66k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureInternationalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CT
    CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $56k · revenue +86%
  • NS
    Norge Ski Club
    2× · 2024–2025 · $6k · revenue +21%
  • TO
    TWIST OUT CANCER
    3× · 2021–2023 · $2k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue -14%
  • UO
    University of Miami Leukemia research Fund
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • NU
    Northwestern University
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
5
Stanley Manne Childrens Research Institute

Stanley manne children's research institute strives to generate new knowledge and advance the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of pediatric diseases.

Health
6
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
7
International Myeloma Foundation

Dedicated to improving the quality of life of myeloma patients while working toward prevention and a cure.

Unclassified
8
Mila's Miracle Foundation

The mission of mila's miracle foundation is to find and fund paths to a cure for batten and other life-threatening neurological disorders. families in this community have been pivotal in raising the necessary funds and awareness. together,…

Health
9
Cog Research Foundation Llc

Cog research foundation, llc is a california 501(c)(3) entity founded in 2024 and designed to become the federal grantee organization for the children's oncology group (cog). the cog, a member of the national cancer institute (nci)…

Health
10
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
11
Solving Kids' Cancer Inc

Skc impacts children through the initiation of clinical research trials of investigative treatment strategies. our vision is to continue expanding the armamentarium of effective and less toxic treartment strategies for pediatric…

Health
12
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cradles to Crayons Inc; the most unlike its peers is Charlie Foundation for Ketogenic Therapies. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
17/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH BOARD OF CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $95,000 · OtherJEWISH BOARD OF CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICESNORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY FEINBURG SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $90,000 · OtherNORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY FEINBURG SCHOOL OF MEDICINEUNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MUSEUM: $55,000 · OtherUNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MUSEUMNORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY - MYELOMA RESEARCH & EDUCATION: $50,000 · OtherNORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY - MYELOMA RESEARCH & EDUCATIONIndividual grant recipient: $43,580 · OtherVAIL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $40,000 · OtherFIDF: $35,000 · OtherUniversity of Pennsylvania: $35,000 · OtherAIEF: $35,000 · OtherUS Holocaust Museum: $30,000 · OtherBFF MYELOMA GIFT FUND: $30,000 · Other+41 more: $288,200 · Other+41 moreINSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION INC: $85,000 · InternationalINSTITUTE…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAELI NAVY SEALS INC: $3,500 · InternationalCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $56,000 · Human Services+2 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · HealthCitizens United for Research in Epilepsy: $10,000 · HealthCHARLIE FOUNDATION FOR KETOGENIC THERAPIES: $5,000 · HealthTWIST OUT CANCER: $2,250 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,000 · HealthGREENWICH ACADEMY INC: $12,500 · EducationKHAN LAB SCHOOL: $2,500 · EducationGLENCOE PTO: $1,500 · EducationBRUNSWICK SCHOOL INC: $1,000 · EducationThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $10,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureNorge Ski Club: $5,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$826,780International$88,500Human Services$58,000Health$49,250Education$17,500Arts & Culture$11,000Recreation & Sports$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION INC: $85,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $56,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREENWICH ACADEMY INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCitizens United for Research in Epilepsy: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNorge Ski Club: $5,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCHARLIE FOUNDATION FOR KETOGENIC THERAPIES: $5,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetZACHARIAS SEXUAL ABUSE CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKHAN LAB SCHOOL: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTWIST OUT CANCER: $2,250 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLENCOE PTO: $1,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWINNETKA HOCKEY CLUB INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetShare our Spare: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRUNSWICK SCHOOL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOD COLLECTIVE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLYNN SAGE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBAND OF PARENTS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE THRESHOLDS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILMETTE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENWICH ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds Citizens United for Research in Epilepsy ↗
  • Who funds Norge Ski Club ↗
  • Who funds CHARLIE FOUNDATION FOR KETOGENIC THERAPIES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bednyak Family FoundationIL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bednyak Family Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bergstein Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bergstein Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc: 2% of income from government
  • National Yiddish Book Center Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bergstein Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph