Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Berger Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$110kCivil Rights$45kEnvironment$24kHuman Services$23kHealth$18kHousing & Shelter$15kFood & Nutrition$11kCrime & Legal$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$240k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOSTON BOOK FESTIVAL$5,000
OTHER UNDER 1000$3,950
MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS$3,000
CHILMARK TOWN AFFAIRS COUNCIL$2,500
HARBOR HOMES MARTHA'S VINEYARD$2,000
PEREGRINE FUND$1,500
YMCA OF MARTHAS VINEYARD$1,500
MARTHA'S VINEYARD COMMUNITY FOUNDAT$1,101
HOSPICE OF MARTHA'S VINEYARD$1,000
BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL$1,000
FRIENDS OF CHILMARK PRESCHOOL$1,000
PLAN A HEALTH$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BLINK NOW FOUNDATION: $2k → 4%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $10k → 16%HOSPICE OF MARTHA'S VINEYARD: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
ID
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MD
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$259k · 16 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +108% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
22

Total granted

$259k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+108%
+36%

Still filing today

63%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BB
    BOSTON BOOK FESTIVAL INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $65k · revenue +108%
  • MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS
    7× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +29%
  • YO
    YMCA of Martha's Vineyard Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +418%

Funded once

  • COMMUNITY SERVINGS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +127%
  • RE
    REPRODUCTIVE EQUITY NOW FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +123%
  • SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +12%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Brighton Marine Inc

Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.

Health
2
Boston Harbor Now Inc

Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…

Environment
3
Berkshire Health Systems Inc

The mission of berkshire health systems is to advance health & wellness for everyone in our community in a welcoming,inclusive & personalized environment.

Health
4
The Boston Foundation for Sight Inc

Our mission is to improve quality of life by transforming the understanding, treatment, and care of the ocular surface.

Human Services
5
Mass General Brigham Health Plan Inc

Mass general brigham health plan's mission is to promote the health and wellness of our members, and to help ensure equitable, affordbale health care for the diverse communities we serve.

Health
6
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
7
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

8
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
9
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

10
Bridgton Hospital

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment, and compassion ofour family of caregivers.

Health
11
Neighborhealth Corporation

Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…

Health
12
Boston Public Market Association Inc

Our mission is to continue to develop and operate a permanent year-round market in boston and to support the farmers, fishers, and entrepreneurs who grow, catch, and produce local food, and to nourish our community with food and…

Public Benefit

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sheriff's Meadow Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Peregrine Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Arts ProgrammingAffordable Housing Developm…Youth Education ProgramsMember Social ClubsIsrael-Focused Jewish Organ…African Development Organiz…Professional Industry Assoc…Urban Environmental & Food …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr14%8%5–10yr21%28%10–20yr21%28%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr13%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr21%41%10–20yr21%21%20–35yr13%13%35–55yr13%20%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
10%
3,915/37,791

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
20/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OTHER UNDER 1000 — $32,335 · OtherOTHER UNDER 1000NARAL PRO CHOICE OF MA FDN — $30,450 · OtherNARAL PRO CHOICE OF MA FDNPRO CHOICE FOUNDATION — $15,000 · OtherPRO CHOICE FOUNDATIONFRIENDS OF PUBLIC GARDEN — $8,500 · OtherFRIENDS OF PUBLIC GARDENBIG BROTHER ASSOCIATION OF BOSTON — $6,100 · OtherMARTHA'S VINEYARD COMMUNITY FOUNDAT — $4,601 · OtherBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION — $5,500 · OtherPROTECT OUR DEFENDERS FOUNDATION % RUSSELL H MILLER — $8,000 · OtherPROTECT OUR DEFENDERS FOUNDATION % RUSSELL H MILLE…+20 more — $26,600 · Other+20 moreBOSTON BOOK FESTIVAL INC — $65,000 · EducationBOSTON BOOK FESTIVAL INCAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC — $2,500 · Education+2 more — $2,200 · EducationMUSEUM OF FINE ARTS — $24,120 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF FINE …HUNTINGTON THEATRE CO INC — $16,500 · Arts & CultureHUNTINGTON THEA…+1 more — $1,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY SERVINGS INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC — $2,500 · Human ServicesBLINKNOW FOUNDATION A NJ NONPROFIT — $1,500 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF MARTHA'S VINEYARD INC DBA HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE OF MARTHA'S — $1,000 · Human ServicesHARBOR HOMES OF MARTHA'S VINEYARD INC — $8,000 · Housing & ShelterISLAND HOUSING TRUST CORPORATION — $5,500 · Housing & ShelterBOSTON RESCUE MISSION INC — $1,000 · Housing & ShelterYMCA of Martha's Vineyard Inc — $14,425 · Recreation & SportsSHERIFF'S MEADOW FOUNDATION — $13,750 · Environment
Other$137,086Education$69,700Arts & Culture$41,620Human Services$15,000Housing & Shelter$14,500Recreation & Sports$14,425Environment$13,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOSTON BOOK FESTIVAL INC — $65,000 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetMUSEUM OF FINE ARTS — $24,120 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHUNTINGTON THEATRE CO INC — $16,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA of Martha's Vineyard Inc — $14,425 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSHERIFF'S MEADOW FOUNDATION — $13,750 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVINGS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROTECT OUR DEFENDERS FOUNDATION % RUSSELL H MILLER — $8,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetHARBOR HOMES OF MARTHA'S VINEYARD INC — $8,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetISLAND HOUSING TRUST CORPORATION — $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION — $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE EQUITY NOW FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARTHA'S VINEYARD PLAYHOUSE INC — $1,600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBOSTON JEWISH FILM INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PEREGRINE FUND INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLINKNOW FOUNDATION A NJ NONPROFIT — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHINING HOPE FOR COMMUNITIES INC — $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON RESCUE MISSION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCIRCUIT ARTS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEADSTRONG FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncMA16.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Martha's Vineyard Bank Charitable Foundation Inc · The Peter and Elizabeth C Tower Foundation · Martha's Vineyard Community Foundation Inc · If Hummingbird Foundation Inc · Tower Family Fund Inc · Mutual Bancorp Foundation Inc Fka Cape Cod 5 Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Berger Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation23% of income from government
  • Community Servings Inc12% of income from government
  • Hospice of Martha's Vineyard Inc Dba Hospice and Palliative Care of Martha's5% of income from government
  • Huntington Theatre Co Inc4% of income from government
  • Sheriff's Meadow Foundation2% of income from government
  • Boston Book Festival Inc2% of income from government
  • Martha's Vineyard Playhouse Inc2% of income from government
  • Harbor Homes of Martha's Vineyard Inc1% of income from government
  • Island Housing Trust Corporation1% of income from government
  • Circuit Arts Inc1% of income from government
  • Museum of Fine Arts0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph