Skip to content

Missouri · Private foundation

Berdach Otto P Tuw

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
2
Grants FY2025
2
Organizations funded FY2024
100%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$5,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 5
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$207k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 100% of the organizations Berdach Otto P Tuw funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesAnimalsHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving2$8k100%
FY20242$10k100%
FY20232$10k50%
FY20225$16k100%
FY20213$10k67%
FY20202$8k100%
FY20193$8k67%
FY20183$7kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$33kHealth$30kHousing & Shelter$7kAnimals$5kYouth Development$3k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 16 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 3 recipients with no EIN on record ($7k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Berdach Otto P Tuw supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDisabled Resources Center Inc: $13,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetFinally Family Homes: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetThe Ohlone Humane Society Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTransitional Living Services Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSimply the Basics: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCayenne Wellness Center and Childrens Foundation Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetThe Redwoods a Community of Seniors: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOperation Homefront Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetElderhelp of San Diego: $3,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHomeless Not Toothless: $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWomen Crowned in Glory Safe Passage: $3,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetThe Edwin & Dorothy Baker Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetWave Academy: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOrange County Adult Achievement Center Dba My Day Counts: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 14.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA11.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Berdach Otto P Tuw with peer funders

About Berdach Otto P Tuw

How much does Berdach Otto P Tuw give?
Berdach Otto P Tuw reported 2 grants totaling $8,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 5 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Berdach Otto P Tuw fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2025, its largest causes are Human Services (42%), Health (39%), Housing & Shelter (9%).
Who are Berdach Otto P Tuw's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2025: Disabled Resources Center Inc ($14k), Giving a Smile Foundation ($5k), Finally Family Homes ($5k).
Does Berdach Otto P Tuw fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Berdach Otto P Tuw accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Berdach Otto P Tuw?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include California Community Foundation, American Endowment Foundation, Charities Aid Foundation America.
Where is Berdach Otto P Tuw based?
Berdach Otto P Tuw is based in MO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Berdach Otto P Tuw’s filings →

More from the funding graph