Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bercaw Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$203k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$540kHuman Services$146kHealth$95kInternational$75kCommunity Improvement$28kMembership Benefit$19kEducation$8kArts & Culture$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTER FOR INDIVIDUAL AND FAMILY THERAPY$55,000
EVERWELL CHURCH$55,000
ST ANDREW PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$30,000
CALVARY CHAPEL CENTRAL OC$20,000
STANSFIELD CIRCLE INC$20,000
CRU$15,000
ORANGE COAST COLLEGE$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $135k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CENTER FOR INDIVIDUAL AND FAMILY THERAPY: $55k → 10%CENTER FOR INDIVIDUAL AND FAMILY THERAPY: $50k → 10%CENTER FOR INDIVIDUAL AND FAMILY THERAPY: $30k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Bercaw Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Bercaw Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$598k · 9 repeat orgs$324k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
13

Total granted

$598k
$241k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+32%

Still filing today

11%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $83k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CALVARY CHAPEL TUSTIN
    3× · 2021–2023 · $160k
  • CF
    CENTER FOR INDIVIDUAL AND FAMILY THERAPY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $135k · revenue +19%
  • RH
    ROCK HARBOR CHURCH
    4× · 2017–2021 · $90k

Funded once

  • C
    CIFT
    one grant, 2020 · $75k
  • CC
    CALVARY CHAPEL OF THE HARBOUR INC
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • CC
    CALVARY CHAPEL OF SAN JOSE
    one grant, 2021 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
05the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
4/4
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CALVARY CHAPEL TUSTIN — $160,000 · OtherCALVARY CHAPEL TUSTINROCK HARBOR CHURCH — $90,000 · OtherROCK HARBOR CHURCHOMF INTERNATIONAL INC — $75,000 · OtherOMF INTERNATIONAL INCCIFT — $75,000 · OtherCIFTEVERWELL CHURCH — $55,000 · OtherEVERWELL CHURCHST ANDREWS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $35,000 · OtherSTANSFIELD CIRCLE INC — $34,500 · OtherAMERICAN LEGION POST 291 — $28,500 · Other+14 more — $198,500 · Other+14 moreCENTER FOR INDIVIDUAL AND FAMILY THERAPY — $135,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR INDIV…Northeast of the Well — $25,000 · ReligionGO MINISTRIES INC — $10,000 · Religion
Other$751,500Human Services$135,000Religion$35,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCENTER FOR INDIVIDUAL AND FAMILY THERAPY — $135,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetNortheast of the Well — $25,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetGO MINISTRIES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEWPORT HARBOR POST 291 OF THE AMERICAN LEGION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTER FOR INDIVIDUAL AND FAMILY THERAPY
  • Who funds Northeast of the Well
  • Who funds GO MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds NEWPORT HARBOR POST 291 OF THE AMERICAN LEGION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Renaissance Charitable Foundation IncIN12.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bercaw Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph