Skip to content

· Private foundation

Benton Telecommunications Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$178k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$647kHuman Services$301kEmployment$232kRecreation & Sports$151kPublic Safety & Disaster$129kYouth Development$68kEducation$57kReligion$54kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $155k
$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EMPLOYMENT ENTERPRISES INC$25,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY - RELAY FOR LIFE$25,000
EASTERN MORRISON COUNTY 4 WHEELER CLUB INC$25,000
CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION - GREAT STRIDES$20,000
MINNESOTA ADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE INC$20,000
MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION$15,000
CITY OF RICE$15,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL MINNESOTA$10,000
RICE WOMEN OF TODAY$2,000
CHRISTIAN REFORMED CHURCH OF PEASE$2,000
RICE AREA FOOD SHELF$2,000
CAN DO CANINES$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
THE BRIDGE AG CHURCH$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $111k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 36% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TANNERS TEAM FOUNDATION: $20k → 9%TANNER'S TEAM FOUNDATION: $20k → 9%INDEPENDENT LIFESTYLES INC: $15k → 9%HORIZON HEALTH INC: $2k → 10%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF MN: $2k → 14%TANNER'S TEAM FOUNDATION: $12k → 9%HORIZON HEALTH INC: $2k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF ST CLOUD: $10k → 11%HORZON HEALTH INC: $2k → 10%CARE - COMMUNITY ACTION RESPECTING ELDERS: $2k → 9%CARE - COMMUNITY ACTION RESPECTING ELDERS: $2k → 9%KINDRED FAMILY FOCUS: $2k → 11%PARAMOUNT CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $2k → 11%PARAMOUNT CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $1k → 11%PARAMOUNT CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $500 → 11%HELPING HANDS OUTREACH: $15k → 11%HELPING HANDS OUTREACH: $1k → 11%HELPING HANDS OUTREACH: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 61 repeat orgs$438k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

61 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 42 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

61
75

Total granted

$1.4M
$398k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+23%

Still filing today

36%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEmploymentInternationalArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EE
    EMPLOYMENT ENTERPRISES INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $163k · revenue +82%
  • TR
    TEREBINTH REFUGE
    5× · 2018–2023 · $109k · revenue +30%
  • AM
    ANNA MARIE'S ALLIANCE
    4× · 2017–2023 · $75k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • MT
    MN TELECOM ALLIANCE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • MS
    MINNESOTA STATE VETERANS MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arc Northland

To promote and protect the rights of people with disabilities and their families while supporting inclusion and participation in the community throughout their lifetime.

—
2
Central Minnesota Jobs and Training Services Inc

Strengthen central mn communities through leadership in workforce excellence.

—
3
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services
4
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
5
Touchstone Mental Health

Touchstone mental health provides innovative, person-centered services that foster hope, health and well-being. we envision a world where all people whose lives are affected by mental illness will flourish with effective treatment, quality…

Human Services
6
Mount Olivet Day Services

To provide high quality care for children and seniors while promoting respect and understanding through intentional intergenerational interaction.

Housing & Shelter
7
Southern Minnesota Independent Living Enterprises & Services Inc

The organization's mission is to support people with disabilities to realize their full potential.

Human Services
8
Mercy House Minneapolis
Human Services
9
Able Inc

A b l e , inc (a brighter living experience, inc) is organized to provide residential care for developmentally disabled minnesota residents at its residential and intermediate care facilities located in houston county, minnesota. the…

Human Services
10
Midstate Independent Living Choices Inc

Milc is a non-residential, independent living center for persons with disabilities. milc provides a variety of services for the purposes of assisting people with disabilities to live more independently in the community. milc staff provides…

Human Services
11
Ecumen

We empower individuals and families to confidently navigate aging so that it is a purposeful journey filled with dignity and support.

—
12
Minnesota Leadership Council On Aging

The Minnesota Leadership Council on Aging is uniting leaders to advance equitable opportunities for all Minnesotans as we age.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Minnesota Assistance Council for Veterans; the most unlike its peers is Gaits of Hope Eap & L Nonprofit. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 142 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/36
Grantees still filing
29/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION - GREAT STRIDES: $160,000 · OtherCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION - GREAT STRIDESAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY - RELAY FOR LIFE: $115,000 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY - RELAY FOR LIFEAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY-BENTON CTY RELAY: $80,000 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY-BENTON CTY RELAYWACOSA: $57,589 · OtherBUCKMAN BALL PARK INC: $47,500 · OtherMILACA FIRE AND RESCUE: $45,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES: $44,667 · Other+111 more: $644,946 · Other+111 moreTEREBINTH REFUGE: $109,295 · HealthTEREBINTH REF…MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $40,000 · HealthMUSCULAR DYST…Minnesota Teen Challenge Inc: $27,000 · HealthMinnesota Tee…RUM RIVER LIFE CHOICES CENTER: $16,750 · HealthRUM RIVER LIF…HONORING CHOICES: $15,000 · HealthHONORING CHOI…+3 more: $7,560 · HealthANNA MARIE'S ALLIANCE: $75,000 · Human ServicesANNA MARIE'…TANNER'S TEAM FOUNDATION: $52,000 · Human ServicesTANNER'S TE…HELPING HANDS OUTREACH: $17,000 · Human ServicesHELPING HAN…INDEPENDENT LIFESTYLES INC A CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $15,000 · Human ServicesINDEPENDENT…CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF ST CLOUD: $10,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CH…+5 more: $17,300 · Human Services+5 moreEMPLOYMENT ENTERPRISES INC: $163,210 · EmploymentEMPLOYMENT…RISE INCORPORATED: $10,000 · EmploymentRISE INCOR…+1 more: $4,000 · EmploymentJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT NORTH: $38,500 · InternationalOVERCOMERS INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP: $28,000 · ReligionINDY FOUNDATION: $24,450 · Philanthropy
Other$1,194,702Health$215,605Human Services$186,300Employment$177,210International$38,500Religion$28,000Philanthropy$24,450

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEMPLOYMENT ENTERPRISES INC: $163,210 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetTEREBINTH REFUGE: $109,295 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetANNA MARIE'S ALLIANCE: $75,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetWACOSA: $57,589 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTANNER'S TEAM FOUNDATION: $52,000 over 3y, 9.3% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT NORTH: $38,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetOVERCOMERS INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP: $28,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetMinnesota Teen Challenge Inc: $27,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINDY FOUNDATION: $24,450 over 2y, 14% of budgetCOMMUNITY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL OF PEASE MN: $21,500 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetHELPING HANDS OUTREACH: $17,000 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetRUM RIVER LIFE CHOICES CENTER: $16,750 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetHONORING CHOICES: $15,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetINDEPENDENT LIFESTYLES INC A CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetElevate Pregnancy and Family Resource Center: $12,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetTHE ARC MINNESOTA INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRISE INCORPORATED: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL MN: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF ST CLOUD: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCROSS CENTER OF BENTON COUNTY: $9,423 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetHORIZON HEALTH INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMILACA AREA PANTRY: $5,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetCARE-COMMUNITY ACTION RESPECTING ELDERS: $4,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMINNESOTA ASSISTANCE COUNCIL FOR VETERANS: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGAITS OF HOPE EAP & L NONPROFIT: $3,760 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetPARAMOUNT CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $3,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL OF WILLMAR: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANGEL FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMORRISON COUNTY FOOD SHELF: $2,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetNEXUS-KINDRED FAMILY HEALING: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EMPLOYMENT ENTERPRISES INC ↗
  • Who funds TEREBINTH REFUGE ↗
  • Who funds ANNA MARIE'S ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds WACOSA ↗
  • Who funds TANNER'S TEAM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT NORTH ↗
  • Who funds OVERCOMERS INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP ↗
  • Who funds Minnesota Teen Challenge Inc ↗
  • Who funds Eastern Morrison County 4 Wheeler Club Inc ↗
  • Who funds INDY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL OF PEASE MN ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HANDS OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds RUM RIVER LIFE CHOICES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HONORING CHOICES ↗
  • Who funds INDEPENDENT LIFESTYLES INC A CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING ↗
  • Who funds Elevate Pregnancy and Family Resource Center ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC MINNESOTA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

CommunitygivingMN34.5× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communitygiving · Otto Bremer Trust · Morgan Family Foundation · Rick and Helga Bauerly Foundation · United Way of Central Minnesota · Granite Partners Foundation of Minnesota Inc · Initiative Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Central Mn Noon Optimist Club Inc · Minnesota Power Foundation · The K Foundation · Central Minnesota Council on Aging Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Benton Telecommunications Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Benton Telecommunications Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Benton Telecommunications Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Benton Telecommunications Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 142 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Benton Telecommunications’ filings →

    More from the funding graph