Skip to content

· Private foundation

Benjamin Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$94k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$260kHuman Services$66kYouth Development$54kEducation$29kReligion$28kPhilanthropy$25kCivil Rights$23kHousing & Shelter$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $55k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$784k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE$15,000
GARDEN TO TABLE$10,000
YELLOWSTONE FOREVER$10,000
EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION$10,000
BOULDER JCC$10,000
WESTERN RESOUCE CENTER$7,500
IMPACT ON EDUCATION$7,500
BOULDER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$5,000
ROCKY MOUNTAIN EQUALITY$5,000
I HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION$3,000
BOULDER BRIDGE HOUSE$2,500
COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
TGTHR$2,000
HAVEN RIDGE$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $87k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER: $500 → 12%BOULDER JCC: $10k → 12%BOULDER JCC: $5k → 12%BOULDER JCC: $5k → 12%BOULDER JCC: $5k → 12%BRIDGE HOUSE: $3k → 12%BOULDER JCC: $3k → 12%BRIDGE HOUSE: $3k → 12%TGTHR: $2k → 12%EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION: $10k → 12%TGTHR: $2k → 12%EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION: $10k → 12%ATTENTION HOMES: $2k → 12%EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION: $10k → 12%TGTHR: $2k → 12%EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION: $10k → 12%TGTHR: $2k → 12%EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION: $3k → 12%ATTENTION HOMES: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$473k · 16 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
4

Total granted

$473k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+182%

Still filing today

56%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $150k · revenue +35%
  • GF
    GROWE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $54k · revenue +67%
  • EF
    EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $43k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • WILD BEAR NATURE CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +182%
  • BO
    Boulder Open Space Conservancygraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +341%
  • BH
    BIG HEART BIG HAND
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boulder Watershed Collective

The Boulder Watershed Collective is a 501c3 non-profit stakeholder-driven organization established to address forested watershed health,resiliency and stewardship. We have three program areas: ClimateAdaptation and Resilience Watershed…

Environment
2
Boulder County Injured and Fallen Officer Foundation
Public Safety & Disaster
3
Stronger Faster Boulder Co
Recreation & Sports
4
Boulder Mountainbike Alliance

The Boulder Mountainbike Alliance exists to serve as a positive voice for mountain biking in the greater Boulder County, Colorado area by improving the trail experience for all users through social rides and events, advocacy, and trail…

Recreation & Sports
5
Boulder Bike Sharing

Promote health, quality of life and preservation of the environment in boulder, colorado by building and operating a comprehensive city-wide bike sharing

—
6
UpRoot Colorado

UpRoot Colorado works to increase nutrition security in Colorado by harvesting and redistributing surplus agricultural crops while supporting the resilience of farmers and creating opportunities for volunteers to learn about and connect…

Food & Nutrition
7
Boulder Shelter for the Homeless Inc

To create avenues to stable housing for our community's homeless adults, from a foundation of supportive and safe shelter.

Housing & Shelter
8
Boulder Carshare

To provide and promote alternatives to individual car ownership, thereby reducing the environmental and social impacts associated with motor vehicle use.

Environment
9
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
10
Boulder Housing Coalition

Provide affordable cooperative housing to the people of Colorado's Front Range.

Housing & Shelter
11
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
12
Open Boulder Foundation

Open Boulder Foundation's purpose is to educate the people of Boulder County about major public policy issues affecting city and county government, and to encourage participation in governance.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation Boulder County; the most unlike its peers is Mother House Dba Haven Ridge. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC: $150,000 · OtherIDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE INCYELLOWSTONE ASSOCIATION: $60,000 · OtherYELLOWSTONE ASSOCIATIONIMPACT ON EDUCATION INC: $29,000 · OtherIMPACT ON EDUCATION INCI HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION: $18,000 · OtherI HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $17,500 · OtherOUT BOULDER COUNTY: $14,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $13,000 · Other+5 more: $31,000 · Other+5 moreEMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION: $42,500 · Human ServicesEMERGENCY FAMILY A…THE BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $27,500 · Human ServicesTHE BOULDER JEWISH…ATTENTION INC: $11,000 · Human ServicesATTENTION INCBridge House: $5,000 · Human ServicesBridge House+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesGROWE FOUNDATION: $54,000 · Youth DevelopmentGROWE FOUND…WILD BEAR NATURE CENTER: $20,000 · EnvironmentYELLOWSTONE FOREVER: $10,000 · EnvironmentBoulder Open Space Conservancy: $2,500 · EnvironmentCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY: $15,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionBOULDER PRIDE: $5,000 · Civil Rights
Other$333,000Human Services$86,500Youth Development$54,000Environment$32,500Philanthropy$15,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Civil Rights$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC: $150,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetGROWE FOUNDATION: $54,000 over 8y, 5.2% of budgetEMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION: $42,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetIMPACT ON EDUCATION INC: $29,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTHE BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $27,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWILD BEAR NATURE CENTER: $20,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetATTENTION INC: $11,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetYELLOWSTONE FOREVER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMOTHER HOUSE DBA HAVEN RIDGE: $6,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBridge House: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOULDER PRIDE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds GROWE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT ON EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WILD BEAR NATURE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds ATTENTION INC ↗
  • Who funds YELLOWSTONE FOREVER ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds MOTHER HOUSE DBA HAVEN RIDGE ↗
  • Who funds Bridge House ↗
  • Who funds BOULDER PRIDE ↗
  • Who funds Boulder Open Space Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation Boulder CountyCO19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation Boulder County · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · AEC Trust · Rose Community Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Impactassetsinc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Benjamin Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Benjamin Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Benjamin Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Benjamin Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Benjamin Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph