Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ben & Esther Rosenbloom Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
32
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$636k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

International$2.0MPhilanthropy$1.9MReligion$1.3MEducation$805kArts & Culture$628kScience & Tech$459kHealth$380kHuman Services$219kOther$0
02FY2024 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $338k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $550k
  • $250k+2 grants · $969k
$20,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$32M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$636,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$333,334
Individual grant recipient$166,000
HILLEL - UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND$163,764
HILLEL - NATIONAL$100,000
Individual grant recipient$70,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER - BALTIMORE$50,000
YESHIVAS LUBAVITZ OF BALTIMORE$35,000
ST JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER$33,333
HEBREW AT THE CENTER$33,000
FOUNDATION FOR THE DEFENSE OF DEMOCRACIES$30,000
BALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$25,000
PJ LIBRARY$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION$25,000
FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$22,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $59k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 37% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JCC ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $10k → 17%RESPECTABILITY: $1k → 8%KULANU ACADEMY: $15k → 6%RESPECTABILITY: $1k → 8%JCC ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $10k → 17%RESPOND INC: $20k → 8%EDMUND BURKE FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
KY
VA
MD
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.6M · 53 repeat orgs$3.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

53 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2024, 33 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

53
48

Total granted

$6.6M
$2.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+39%

Still filing today

57%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $426k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    BALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $375k · revenue +82%
  • WI
    WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY
    5× · 2019–2023 · $354k · revenue +4%
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2019–2021 · $225k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • AJ
    ASSOCIATED JEWISH FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE - PHILANTHROPIC FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $1.1M
  • AJ
    ASSOCIATED JEWISH FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE
    one grant, 2023 · $512k
  • PI
    PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $236k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
Jewish Electorate Institute

The jewish electorate institute (jei) is an independent, non-partisan 501(c)(3) organization that surveys, interprets, reports, and educates the public about the perspectives, voting behaviors, and motivations of the american jewish…

Civil Rights
3
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
4
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
5
The Israel Institute Inc

The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.

International
6
University of Judaism Foundation
—
7
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
8
Israel-America Academic Exchange

Israel-america academic exchange (iaae) is a nonprofit organization whose mission is todeepen the understanding of israel and the middle east within the international academiccommunity. the organization organizes educational missions and…

International
9
Israel 21c

Through its news service and public programs, Israel 21c educates individuals and groups about comtemporary life in Israel providing news and information on the people of Israel, its culture and business and scientific achievements.

Education
10
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
11
American Friends of Bar-Ilan University

We fundraise in the u.s. to support, and raise awareness of, bar-ilan university in israel.

Education
12
The Shalem Foundation

To promote and foster the creation of a zionist intellectual infrastructure for the state of israel, the development of a jewish national culture, and the establishment and promotion of intellectual and economic liberty.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed Israel Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Center for the Study of Great Ideas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 116 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
59/61
Grantees still filing
45/61
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE ASSOCIATED: $1,728,875 · OtherTHE ASSOCIATEDASSOCIATED JEWISH FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE - PHILANTHROPIC FUND: $1,100,000 · OtherASSOCIATED JEWISH FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE - PHILANTHROPIC FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $849,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHILLEL - UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND: $609,849 · OtherHILLEL - UNIVERSITY OF MARYLANDASSOCIATED JEWISH FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE: $511,950 · OtherASSOCIATED JEWISH FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE+66 more: $2,601,613 · Other+66 moreAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $459,000 · InternationalAMERICAN SOCIETY F…WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY: $354,000 · InternationalWASHINGTON INSTITU…JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $333,334 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FU…Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc: $180,000 · InternationalFoundation for the…MIDDLE EAST FORUM: $121,000 · InternationalMIDDLE EAST FORUMFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $79,600 · InternationalFRIENDS OF ELNET: $75,000 · International+10 more: $179,105 · International+10 morePEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $442,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK: $127,198 · PhilanthropyBRIGANCE BRIGADE FOUNDATION INC: $20,600 · Philanthropy+3 more: $26,000 · PhilanthropyBALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $375,000 · Arts & CultureTHE AMERICAN VISIONARY ART MUSEUM INC: $77,500 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $54,000 · Arts & CultureBALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ART: $30,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $33,000 · Arts & CultureJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $225,000 · EducationHEBREW AT THE CENTER INC: $165,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF YESHIVAS RASHI INC: $70,000 · EducationST JOHN'S COLLEGE: $28,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Education+4 more: $18,100 · EducationGREENLIGHT FUND INC: $80,000 · Community ImprovementRESPOND Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $20,000 · Human ServicesKULANU ACADEMY INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesDISABILITY BELONGS: $2,000 · Human ServicesEdmund Burke Foundation Inc: $2,000 · Human Services
Other$7,401,287International$1,781,039Philanthropy$615,798Arts & Culture$569,500Education$531,100Community Improvement$80,000Human Services$59,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $459,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $442,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $375,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY: $354,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $333,334 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $225,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc: $180,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHEBREW AT THE CENTER INC: $165,000 over 5y, 7.1% of budgetJEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK: $127,198 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMIDDLE EAST FORUM: $121,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetGREENLIGHT FUND INC: $80,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $79,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN VISIONARY ART MUSEUM INC: $77,500 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF ELNET: $75,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF YESHIVAS RASHI INC: $70,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $54,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKULANU INC: $43,000 over 2y, 9.2% of budgetAICE INC AMERICAN-ISRAELI COOPERATIVE ENTERPRISE: $35,005 over 1y, 16% of budgetTHE LAWFARE PROJECT INC: $35,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetALEPH SOCIETY INC: $30,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetBALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ART: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST JOHN'S COLLEGE: $28,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $25,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGANCE BRIGADE FOUNDATION INC: $20,600 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetRESEARCH - EVAL - PROMOTING ORG RESPON & TRANSPARENCY - REPORT - INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetThe Den Collective Inc: $20,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetRESPOND Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetARTS FOR LEARNING MARYLAND INC: $18,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $18,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMACCABI WORLD UNION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetKULANU ACADEMY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetInternet Development Fund: $10,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetWashington and Lee University: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF GREAT IDEAS: $8,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHOPEWELL CANCER SUPPORT: $6,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetDELEGATION OF JEWISH AMERICAN STUDENTS (DOJAS): $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetENDOWMENT FOR MIDDLE EAST TRUTH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFEED ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGush Etzion Foundation % Juliette Landesman: $5,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetJEWISH INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY OF AMERICA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCYLBURN ARBORETUM FRIENDS INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHASBARA FELLOWSHIPS INCORPORATED: $3,600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE JEMICY SCHOOL INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds BALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc ↗
  • Who funds HEBREW AT THE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLE EAST FORUM ↗
  • Who funds GREENLIGHT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN VISIONARY ART MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ELNET ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF YESHIVAS RASHI INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds KULANU INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY30× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Mayberg Foundation Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · Eliasberg Family Foundation Inc · The Milstein Family Foundation · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Marcus Foundation Inc · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · Hochberg Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ben & Esther Rosenbloom Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ben & Esther Rosenbloom Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 150%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Respond Inc: 80% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Baltimore Symphony Orchestra Inc: 11% of income from government
  • The American Visionary Art Museum Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Baltimore Museum of Art: 4% of income from government
  • St John's College: 2% of income from government
  • Arts for Learning Maryland Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
15get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ben & Esther Rosenbloom Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Ben & Esther Rosenbloom Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 116 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ben & Esther Rosenbloom’s filings →

More from the funding graph