Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ben and Catherine Ivy Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16M
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$4.3M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$78MPublic Safety & Disaster$5.7MEmployment$4.8MEducation$2.5MReligion$2.1MPhilanthropy$953kScience & Tech$128kYouth Development$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $303k
  • $250k+22 grants · $16M
$250,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$315M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEURO TRIALS LLC$4,300,000
NEURO TRIALS LLC$2,755,000
NEUROTRIALS LLC$2,295,000
NEURO TRIALS LLC$1,575,000
ST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION$368,660
CLEVELAND CLINIC$300,000
MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$300,000
REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$300,000
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFO$300,000
CITY OF HOPE MEDICAL CENTER$300,000
NEURO TRIALS LLC$300,000
SWEDISH HEALTH SERVICES$300,000
TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH TGE$300,000
JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL$300,000
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL$300,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $7.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION: $6.0M → 11%ST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION: $900k → 11%ST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION: $525k → 11%ST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION: $369k → 11%ST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION: $135k → 11%ST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%NOTMYKID: $1k → 11%NOTMYKID: $621 → 11%NOTMYKID: $575 → 11%NOTMYKID: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
CT
RI
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$86M · 40 repeat orgs$3.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

40 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
20

Total granted

$86M
$3.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
0%

Still filing today

33%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $263k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationReligionHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $7.9M · revenue +33% · 70% of their budget
  • DC
    DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +63%
  • TJ
    THE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL
    2× · 2024–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA
    one grant, 2023 · $900k
  • RV
    RECTOR VISITORS OF UNIV OF VA
    one grant, 2024 · $900k
  • PP
    PHOENIX POLICE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $720k · revenue 0% · 32% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
2
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
5
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
6
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
7
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
8
Loyola University Medical Center

We, loyola university health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.lumc is a member of loyola university health system and trinity…

Health
9
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
10
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
11
Dominican Hospital Foundation

The mission of the dominican hospital foundation is to ensure that philanthropic resources are available to respond to and support the changing health care needs of the people within the area served by dignity health dba dominican…

Health
12
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Barrow Neurological Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Als New Mexico. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
16/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEUROTRIALS LLC: $50,263,539 · OtherNEUROTRIALS LLCAZ CORONA VIRUS RELIEF FUND: $6,000,000 · OtherAZ CORONA VIRUS RELIEF FUND+41 more: $17,781,518 · Other+41 moreST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION: $7,908,660 · Human ServicesST JOSEPH…+1 more: $2,696 · Human ServicesTHE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL: $1,397,150 · HealthMAYO CLINIC: $1,004,182 · HealthCANCER RESEARCH FUND OF THE DAMON RUNYON-WALTER WINCHELL FOUNDATION: $860,000 · HealthSWEDISH HEALTH SERVICES: $600,000 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $600,000 · Health+7 more: $56,000 · HealthDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX: $2,130,000 · Religion+1 more: $20,000 · ReligionIndiana University Foundation: $597,184 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $500,000 · EducationVanderbilt University: $500,000 · EducationEmory University: $250,000 · EducationLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $250,000 · EducationVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $950,000 · PhilanthropyPHOENIX POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $719,675 · Public Safety & DisasterYOUNG LIFE: $20,568 · Youth Development
Other$74,045,057Human Services$7,911,356Health$4,517,332Religion$2,150,000Education$2,097,184Philanthropy$950,000Public Safety & Disaster$719,675Youth Development$20,568

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION: $7,908,660 over 3y, 70% of budgetDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX: $2,130,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetTHE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL: $1,397,150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $1,004,182 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $950,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH FUND OF THE DAMON RUNYON-WALTER WINCHELL FOUNDATION: $860,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $846,800 over 3y, 93% of budgetPHOENIX POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $719,675 over 1y, 32% of budgetSWEDISH HEALTH SERVICES: $600,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $600,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIndiana University Foundation: $597,184 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVanderbilt University: $500,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University: $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GRAY MATTERS FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 2y, 30% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $20,568 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMONSPIRIT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNOTMYKID: $2,696 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMANDA HOPE RAINBOW ANGELS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALS NEW MEXICO: $540 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA WOMEN'S BOARD: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX ↗
  • Who funds THE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH FUND OF THE DAMON RUNYON-WALTER WINCHELL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX POLICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SWEDISH HEALTH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ16.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · American Express Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ben and Catherine Ivy Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ben and Catherine Ivy Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The Johns Hopkins Hospital: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ben and Catherine Ivy Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ben and Catherine Ivy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ben and Catherine Ivy’s filings →

More from the funding graph