· Private foundation
Belmay Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k26 grants · $48k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $38k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY | $20,000 |
| VOLUNTEER NEW YORK | $17,500 |
| GIVING CIRCLE OF LOWER WESTCHESTER | $7,500 |
| LET'S WIN PANCREATIC CANCER | $5,000 |
| METROPOLIS COUNTRY CLUB FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| STUDENTS 2 SCIENCE INC | $5,000 |
| BETH EL SYNAGOGUE CENTER | $2,500 |
| MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB | $2,142 |
| FRIENDS OF THE IDF | $2,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD HUDSON PECONIC | $2,000 |
| NOTLEY IMPACT | $2,000 |
| FOCUS FOR DEMOCRACY | $1,500 |
| FITZGERALD HEBREW CONGREGATION | $1,500 |
| CHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER | $1,000 |
| SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
35 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- VSVOLUNTEER SERVICE BUREAU OF WESTCHESTER INC7× · 2019–2025 · $115k · revenue +69%
- THThe Hospital for Special Surgery Fund Inc5× · 2019–2023 · $105k · revenue +26%
- S2STUDENTS 2 SCIENCE INC5× · 2019–2025 · $63k · revenue +120%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $10k
- EFETOWAH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $5k
- CBCONGREGATION BAIS EPHRAIM INCone grant, 2020 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Volunteer Service Bureau of Westchester Inc and the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VOLUNTEER SERVICE BUREAU OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds The Hospital for Special Surgery Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds STUDENTS 2 SCIENCE INC ↗
- Who funds GIVING CIRCLE OF LOWER WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEW ROCHELLE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD HUDSON PECONIC INC ↗
- Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
- Who funds CHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds YONKERS PARTNERS IN EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN COUNCIL ON SCIENCE AND HEALTH ↗
- Who funds THE SHARING SHELF INC ↗
- Who funds IMPACT100 WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LETS WIN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WORKING AMERICA EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds Cornell University ↗
- Who funds Emory University ↗
- Who funds WNET ↗
- Who funds Armed Services Arts Partnership ↗
- Who funds HUDSON LINK FOR HIGHER EDUCATION IN PRISON INC ↗
- Who funds MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NEW ROCHELLE INC ↗
- Who funds NOTLEY IMPACT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The New York Community Trust · Pcsb Community Foundation · St Faith's House Foundation · The Thomas and Agnes Carvel Foundation · United Way of Westchester and Putnam · Jewish Communal Fund · Impact100 Westchester Inc · Webster Bank Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Margaret Cameron and James M Glickenhaus Foundation · Eileen Fisher Foundation · Pilzer Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Belmay Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Students 2 Science Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.