Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Eileen Fisher Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$167k
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Science & Tech$300kPhilanthropy$266kHealth$230kEnvironment$185kReligion$120kSocial Science$95kHuman Services$94kCivil Rights$71kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $125k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$7.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STORYDANCER PROJECT$25,000
PRESENCING INSTITUTE$25,000
OMEGA INSTITUTE$25,000
SCENIC HUDSON$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD HUDSON PECONIC$10,000
NORTH STAR FUND$10,000
RIVERKEEPER INC$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA$10,000
URBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE$6,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION$5,000
WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$5,000
ONE EARTH PHILANTHROPY$5,000
LONGHOUSE RESERVE$3,000
COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $84k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA AND HEALTH: $10k → 12%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $3k → 11%YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $3k → 21%BOLD FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA AND HEALTH: $10k → 12%KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA AND HEALTH: $10k → 12%DELIVERING GOOD: $5k → 17%WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS: $5k → 17%NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%REMAKE: $1k → 10%NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%TRIBAL LINK FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%URBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE: $7k → 17%WESTCHESTER CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
MD
AZ
NM
NC
DC
HI
AL
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 14% of Eileen Fisher Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Eileen Fisher Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.5% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 34 repeat orgs$232k to everyone else

34 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
36

Total granted

$1.1M
$223k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+23%

Still filing today

74%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationEnvironmentEmploymentArts & CultureHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PI
    PRESENCING INSTITUTE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $300k · revenue +162%
  • RI
    RIVERKEEPER INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $115k · revenue +31%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $53k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • N
    NAACP
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • THE LOVELAND FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue ×11
  • WF
    WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +2%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Women First Inc

Women first invests in grassroots initiatives driven by women and girls in developing economies that sustainably advance their lives.

International
2
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
3
Women Donors Network

Women donors network advances a just, equitable, and sustainable world through the power of philanthropy, women's leadership, and collective and individual action.

Philanthropy
4
International Women's Forum Inc

The mission of the international women's forum is to advance women's leadership worldwide. iwf takes direct action to achieve our mission in three important ways. connect: our convenings provide networking and cutting-edge content…

Education
5
Women's World Banking Inc

The mission of women's world banking is to expand the economicassets, participation and power of low-income women and theirhouseholds by helping them access financial services, knowledge andmarkets. for more information, see schedule o.

International
6
Stichting to Promote Women's World Banking

The mission of stichting to promote women's world banking is to expand the economic assets, participation and power of low-income women and their households by helping them access financial services, knowledge and markets. for more…

7
Women's Business Enterprise National Council

Wbenc's mission is to fuel economic growth globally by identifying, certifying, and facilitating the development of women-owned businesses.

Civil Rights
8
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
9
World Pulse Voices

World Pulse is a global social impact network connecting women from 227 countries to accelerate social change. We provide a safe and supportive online space where women can speak for themselves, make powerful connections, and access the…

Human Services
10
Women Deliver Inc

Women deliver is a global feminist advocacy organization with a clear mission: to ensure that every self-identifying girl and woman has control over her body and life. see organization's full mission statement in schedule o.

Education
11
New York Foundation for the Arts Inc

Established in 1971, the mission of the new york foundation for the arts (nyfa) is to empower artists in all disciplines, as well as cultural workers, to achieve success on their own terms by providing critical support, resources, and…

Arts & Culture
12
Global Impact Investing Network Inc

The global impact investing network, inc. is dedicated to increasing the scale and effectiveness of impact investing to solve systemic problems facing people and the planet. impact investments are investments made into companies,…

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is IMPACT100 Westchester Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bold Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyEnvironmental Conservation …Pregnancy Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Community Arts CentersDevelopmental Disabilities …Community College Foundatio…Independent K-12 SchoolsDomestic Violence ServicesChristian Missionary Organi…Women & Girls Leadership De…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%31%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%28%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr16%16%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/58
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,507

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

57 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 57 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
56/57
Grantees still filing
33/57
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE EILEEN FISHER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 · OtherTHE EILEEN FISHER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCUNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST ASSOCIATION — $120,000 · OtherUNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST ASSOCIATIONOMEGA INSTITUTE — $85,000 · OtherOMEGA INSTITUTENAACP — $25,000 · OtherWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL — $25,000 · OtherTHE LOVELAND FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · Other+39 more — $240,339 · Other+39 morePRESENCING INSTITUTE INC — $300,000 · EducationPRESENCING INSTITUTE INCOMEGA INSTITUTE FOR HOLISTIC STUDIES INC — $50,000 · EducationOMEGA INSTITUTE FOR HOLISTI…+5 more — $34,000 · Education+5 moreRIVERKEEPER INC — $115,000 · EnvironmentRIVERKEEPER …Scenic Hudson Inc — $37,500 · EnvironmentScenic Hudso…The Pachamama Alliance — $17,500 · EnvironmentThe Pachamam…ONE EARTH PHILANTHROPY — $12,500 · EnvironmentONE EARTH PH…THE STORYDANCER PROJECT INC — $110,000 · Arts & CultureIRVINGTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $6,000 · Arts & CultureFRACTURED ATLAS INC — $4,000 · Arts & CulturePLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $52,500 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD HUDSON PECONIC INC — $52,500 · Health+1 more — $3,000 · HealthKRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA & HEALTH — $30,000 · Human ServicesNEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC — $22,500 · Human ServicesURBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE — $6,500 · Human ServicesWOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesTRIBAL LINK FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesDELIVERING GOOD INC — $5,000 · Human Services+5 more — $9,500 · Human ServicesHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $20,000 · PhilanthropyROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE NEW WORLD FOUNDATION — $5,000 · PhilanthropyIMPACT100 WESTCHESTER INC — $3,400 · PhilanthropyWESTCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 · Philanthropy
Other$670,339Education$384,000Environment$182,500Arts & Culture$120,000Health$108,000Human Services$83,500Philanthropy$50,900

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPRESENCING INSTITUTE INC — $300,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetTHE EILEEN FISHER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetRIVERKEEPER INC — $115,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTHE STORYDANCER PROJECT INC — $110,000 over 4y, 23% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $52,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD HUDSON PECONIC INC — $52,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOMEGA INSTITUTE FOR HOLISTIC STUDIES INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetScenic Hudson Inc — $37,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetKRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA & HEALTH — $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC — $22,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH STAR FUND INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAMAPO FOR CHILDREN INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Pachamama Alliance — $17,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMy Sisters Place Inc — $15,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetYES SHE CAN INCORPORATED — $12,500 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetONE EARTH PHILANTHROPY — $12,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWomens Funding Network — $11,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE GARRISON INSTITUTE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYDAY PEOPLE FOR CHANGE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNET IMPACT — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCompanies for Causes — $10,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTHE ASIA FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK ABORTION ACCESS FUND — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetURBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE — $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIRVINGTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $6,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetWOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTONATIERRA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE — $5,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetTHE NEW WORLD FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRIBAL LINK FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTexas Women's Foundation — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCUSTOM COLLABORATIVE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE LEAGUE OF INTRAPRENEURS — $5,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetDELIVERING GOOD INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIMPACT100 WESTCHESTER INC — $3,400 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetLONGHOUSE RESERVE — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCREATIVE HEALING FOR YOUTH IN PAIN — $3,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetYWCA WHITE PLAINS & CENTRAL WESTCHESTER INC AND ITS AFFILIATES — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ST JOSEPH — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWESTCHESTER CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAWTHORNE VALLEY ASSOCIATION INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIRVINGTON VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORPS — $2,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Novo FoundationNY19× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Novo Foundation · The Ford Foundation · Tides Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Impactassetsinc · The Rockefeller Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Td Charitable Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Rsf Social Finance Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Eileen Fisher Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 28%
  • Presencing Institute Inc28% of income from government
  • Rising Tide Capital Inc and Subsidiaries2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Eileen Fisher Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Eileen Fisher Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph