Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Margaret Cameron and James M Glickenhaus Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$325k
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 44% of MARGARET CAMERON AND JAMES M GLICKENHAUS FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k33 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $250k
$1,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE METROPOLITAN OPERA$50,000
DUPUYTREN RESEARCH GROUP$50,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE$50,000
THE POSSIBILITY PROJECT$10,000
UJA FEDERATION OF NEW YORK$10,000
JERICHO PROJECT$5,000
CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK$5,000
RYE FREE READING ROOM$5,000
NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK$5,000
CALVARY HOSPITAL$2,500
INTERNATIONAL FIBRODYSPLASIA OSSIFICANS PROGRESSIVA ASSOC$2,500
HOPE FOR UKRAINE$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ORGANIZATION FOR REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SUCCESS: $10k → 7%CARVER CENTER: $2k → 9%NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK: $5k → 7%CARVER CENTER: $2k → 9%PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER: $1k → 9%NEIGHBORS LINK: $1k → 9%SPRYE: $1k → 9%5 STEPS TO FIVE: $1k → 9%SPRYE: $1k → 9%5 STEPS TO FIVE: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
MN
NY
NJ
CT
CA
MO
VA
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$432k · 23 repeat orgs$198k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
19

Total granted

$432k
$111k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

74%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $87k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyHealthCivil RightsArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DR
    Dupuytren Research Group Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $64k · revenue +31%
  • PC
    PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $5k · revenue +61%
  • FW
    FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $3k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • N
    NYCB
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • HT
    HOLY TRINITY CHURCH INWOOD
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • OF
    ORGANIZATION FOR REFUGEE AND
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Road Runners Inc

As a new york city based nonprofit, we're dedicated to transforming the health and well-being of our communities through inclusive and accessible running experiences, empowering all to achieve their potential.

—
2
Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc

Rockefeller philanthropy advisors aims to accelerate philanthropy in pursuit of a just world

Philanthropy
3
West Side Center for Community Life

To pursue anti-hunger initiatives through the west side campaign against hunger (wscah) program whose mission is to alleviate hunger by ensuring that all new yorkers have access with dignity to a choice of healthy food and supportive…

Youth Development
4
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
5
The Partnership for New York City Inc

(a) the development, stimulation, encouragement, improvement and promotion of the business climate in new york city; (b) the fostering of trade and commerce in new york city and the promotion of the general welfare andprosperity of new…

—
6
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
7
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
City Report Inc

CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.

Arts & Culture
9
Westchester Jewish Community Services Inc

Westchester jewish community services (wjcs) is a non-sectarian, not for profit, broad based human service agency dedicated to helping people of all ages cope with emotional, cognitive, environmental, physical, social, and educational…

Health
10
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is IMPACT100 Westchester Inc and the most unlike its peers is Inclusive Ski Touring. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Jewish Community FederationsPublic Library SupportHospice Care ServicesClassical Music EnsemblesEarly Childhood Education C…Senior Support ServicesCommunity Arts OrganizationsYouth Development CentersLand Conservation Organizat…Fallen First Responder Supp…Pregnancy Support ServicesDevelopmental Disabilities …Cancer Support OrganizationsCommunity Health CentersFood Pantries & Assistance
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%5%<5yr14%14%5–10yr20%23%10–20yr19%19%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr16%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%1%<5yr14%3%5–10yr20%30%10–20yr19%49%20–35yr13%8%35–55yr16%9%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/46
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,714

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/42
Grantees still filing
18/42
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE METROPOLITAN OPERA — $100,000 · OtherTHE METROPOLITAN OPERANYCB — $50,000 · OtherNYCBIndividual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOLY TRINITY CHURCH INWOOD — $20,000 · OtherHOLY TRINITY CHURCH INWOODIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · Other+31 more — $57,082 · Other+31 moreEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $100,000 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVEANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $100,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE+1 more — $5,000 · Civil RightsDupuytren Research Group Inc — $63,500 · HealthDupuytren Re…CALVARY HOSPITAL INC — $2,500 · Health+4 more — $5,000 · Health+4 moreCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $10,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyPebble Beach Company Foundation — $2,500 · PhilanthropyIMPACT100 WESTCHESTER INC — $2,150 · PhilanthropyMIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION — $1,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICA GIVES INC — $1,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $500 · PhilanthropyORGANIZATION FOR REFUGEE AND — $10,000 · Human ServicesPORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesNew Hampshire Catholic Charities — $5,000 · Human Services5 Steps to Five — $2,000 · Human ServicesSPRYE INC — $2,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORS LINK CORP — $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE POSSIBILITY PROJECT INC — $20,000 · Crime & LegalJERICHO PROJECT — $5,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$287,082Civil Rights$205,000Health$71,000Philanthropy$27,150Human Services$25,000Crime & Legal$20,000Housing & Shelter$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDupuytren Research Group Inc — $63,500 over 3y, 17% of budgetTHE POSSIBILITY PROJECT INC — $20,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetORGANIZATION FOR REFUGEE AND — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRYE FREE READING ROOM — $5,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJERICHO PROJECT — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC — $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNew Hampshire Catholic Charities — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPebble Beach Company Foundation — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIMPACT100 WESTCHESTER INC — $2,150 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDANIEL'S MUSIC FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget5 Steps to Five — $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE DANNY BUTLER MEMORIAL FUND INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCARITAS OF PORT CHESTER INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPRYE INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetInclusive Ski Touring — $2,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetTHE RYE ARTS CENTER INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNT WASHINGTON OBSERVATORY — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE FOR UKRAINE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHARING SHELF INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF RYE TOWN PARK INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NEW ROCHELLE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOLICE ASSOCIATION OF THE CITY OF RYE INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTERGAR INTERNATIONAL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA GIVES INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUL RYEDERS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAVON LITTLE LEAGUE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetOPEN DOOR FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPART OF THE SOLUTION — $230 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Glickenhaus Found…The Joe & Sandy Sambe…The Dunn Family Found…The New York Communit…Mile 20 Foundation IncSalice Family Foundat…Belmay Family Foundat…Nicholas & Christina …John and Jennifer Eck…The Bernard & Muriel …The Tiger Tail Family…Jewish Communal Fund
The Glickenhaus FoundationNY34.7× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Glickenhaus Foundation · The Joe & Sandy Samberg Foundation Inc · The Dunn Family Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Mile 20 Foundation Inc · Salice Family Foundation · Belmay Family Foundation Inc · Nicholas & Christina Raho Foundationinc · John and Jennifer Eckerson Family Foundation C/O Citrin Cooperman · The Bernard & Muriel Lauren Foundation · The Tiger Tail Family Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Margaret Cameron and James M Glickenhaus Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Margaret Cameron and James M Glickenhaus Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Margaret Cameron and James M Glickenhaus Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines