Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bell Foundation Inc

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$132k
Granted FY2023
11
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Education$54kHealth$34kAnimals$29kArts & Culture$29kReligion$13kYouth Development$4kHuman Services$315Recreation & Sports$250Other$0
02FY2023 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k3 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $126k
$12,935
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE$32,338
COLLEGE POSSIBLE$15,522
MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM$13,035
Individual grant recipient$12,935
CHARLES E KUBLY FOUNDATION$12,935
ASSOC PREVENT CRUELTY ANIMALS$12,935
UW SCHOOL OF VETERINARY MED$12,935
MILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$12,935
Individual grant recipient$3,881
MILWAUKEE AREA DOMESTIC ANIMAL CTL$2,764
HISTORIC WATER TOWER LANDMARK$45
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FASD COMMUNITIES: $100 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$116k · 10 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
12

Total granted

$116k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+14%

Still filing today

50%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationArts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE CORPORATION
    6× · 2017–2023 · $37k · revenue +39%
  • THE CHARLES E KUBLY FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $15k · revenue +3%
  • MA
    MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $13k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • SO
    SCHOOL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE
    one grant, 2019 · $500
  • TH
    THREE HOLY WOMEN PARISH
    one grant, 2018 · $250
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mathematics Institute of Wisconsin Co Kathryn Leverenz
Education
2
Medical Society of Milwaukee Foundation Inc
Health
3
Milwaukee Institute of Art & Design Inc

The milwaukee institute of art and design's mission is to ignite curious minds through art, design and service. we value courage to seek our own path, integrity to pursue our lives and work with meaning, kindness to thoughtfully engage…

—
4
Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce

Improve metro milwaukee as a place to create jobs, invest capital and grow business.

—
5
Wisconsin Public Radio Association Inc

The purpose of the wisconsin public radio association (wpra) is to support wisconsin public radio by engaging in cooperative fundraising, stewardship and advocacy. the wpra generates support through programs and participatory activities…

Arts & Culture
6
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
7
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
8
Wisconsin Medical Society Inc

To improve the health of the people of wisconsin by supporting and strengthening physicians' ability to practice high quality patient care in a changing environment.

—
9
The Uwm Foundation Inc

The mission of the uwm foundation, inc. is to support the educational, literary, and scientific endeavors of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee by receiving, managing, and distributing gifts to benefit the university's students,…

Education
10
Milwaukee World Festival Inc

The corporation shall be a civic organization not organized for profit but operated exclusively for charitable and educational purposes including in furtherance thereof, the production of an annual festival in the milwaukee metropolitan…

Arts & Culture
11
Wisconsin Municipal Clerks Association Incorporated

Our mission is to be the premier source for the personal empowerment of municipal clerks in wisconsin through education, professional development, and the promotion of excellence.

—
12
The Uwm Real Estate Foundation Inc

To partner with the public and private sectors to develop and hold real estate for the benefit of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee. the uwm real estate foundation, inc. holdings may include any properties that advance the mission of…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Milwaukee Art Museum Inc; the most unlike its peers is College Possible Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $17,970 · OtherIndividual grant recipientASSOC PREVENT CRUELTY ANIMALS: $12,935 · OtherASSOC PREVENT CRUELTY ANIMALSUW SCHOOL OF VETERINARY MED: $12,935 · OtherUW SCHOOL OF VETERINARY MEDIndividual grant recipient: $5,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $5,031 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOPERATION DREAM INC: $4,000 · OtherOPERATION DREAM INCMILWAUKEE AREA DOMESTIC ANIMAL CTL: $2,764 · Other+10 more: $4,500 · Other+10 moreTHE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE CORPORATION: $37,438 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE C…COLLEGE POSSIBLE INC: $15,522 · EducationCOLLEGE POSSIBLE INC+1 more: $200 · EducationMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $15,335 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY …MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $13,395 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE ART MUSEU…THE CHARLES E KUBLY FOUNDATION INC: $15,235 · HealthTHE CHARLE…LAKE PARK FRIENDS LTD: $250 · PhilanthropyFASD Communities: $100 · Human ServicesMICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $100 · Animals
Other$65,635Education$53,160Arts & Culture$28,730Health$15,235Philanthropy$250Human Services$100Animals$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE CORPORATION: $37,438 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLEGE POSSIBLE INC: $15,522 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $15,335 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHARLES E KUBLY FOUNDATION INC: $15,235 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $13,395 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION DREAM INC: $4,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetLAKE PARK FRIENDS LTD: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWISCONSIN PARKINSON ASSOCIATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE POSSIBLE INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHARLES E KUBLY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION DREAM INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKE PARK FRIENDS LTD ↗
  • Who funds THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN PARKINSON ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FASD Communities ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County IncWI15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bell Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bell Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bell’s filings →

    More from the funding graph