Which funders back the same organizations as Beis Aharon VYisroel Inc DBA American Friends of Here Next Year?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Ojc Fund, Jewish Communal Fund, Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc.

Beis Aharon VYisroel Inc DBA American Friends of Here Next Year

Beis Aharon VYisroel Inc DBA American Friends of Here Next Year at a glance Also receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Beis Aharon VYisroel Inc DBA American Friends of Here Next Year

Q: What does Beis Aharon VYisroel Inc DBA American Friends of Here Next Year fund?

By grant dollars over FY2022 to FY2024, its largest causes are Religion (50%), International (23%), Health (12%).

Q: Who are Beis Aharon VYisroel Inc DBA American Friends of Here Next Year's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2022 to FY2024: Yad Yisroel ($776k), Children's Hospital Corporation ($430k), Cong Neimus Moshe ($387k).

Q: Does Beis Aharon VYisroel Inc DBA American Friends of Here Next Year fund new organizations?

In FY2023, 67% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

To create a vibrant Jewish future for the entire generation of Jews in the FSU and Israel.

$1.0M

Granted FY2024still arriving

Grants FY2024still arriving

States reached

$113k

Largest

01What it funds

0177% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Religion$1.9MInternational$842kHealth$430kPhilanthropy$219kHuman Services$81kEducation$38kOther$0

02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured

The 11 grants below total $327,446, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,035,820 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $708,374 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k4 grants · $24k
$10k–50k6 grants · $191k
$50k–250k1 grant · $113k

$29,125

Median grant

States reached

$2.3M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
Ahavas Oylom	$112,517
Join Israel	$45,000
Congregation Zichron Yaakov Y	$41,682
Yad Yisroel	$31,872
Individual grant recipient	$31,560
Various Charitable Organizati	$29,125
Individual grant recipient	$12,040
RAJE USA	$6,800
Individual grant recipient	$6,000
Khal Chasidim of Dexter Park	$5,450
Merkaz Hatzdaka	$5,400

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 83% of grant dollars ($3.1M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 17% that went abroad ($627k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $164k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 17% of all-years giving ($627k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

Israel$614k · 7 grants

Ukraine$13k · 1 grant

Grants abroad, by region: $547k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Israel$504k · 92% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Provide support

Ukraine$43k · 8% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Provide support

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

25%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$943k · 6 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$943k

$2.7M

Still filing today

37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $81k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureReligionInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CN
CONG NEIMUS MOSHE
2× · 2022–2023 · $387k
VC
Various Charitable Organizati
3× · 2022–2024 · $219k
CC
CONGREGATION CHONEN VNOSEN
2× · 2023–2024 · $119k

Funded once

YY
YAD YISROEL
one grant, 2022 · $776k · revenue -73%
VH
Vaad Hatzalah for Ukranian
one grant, 2022 · $500k
CH
Children's Hospital Corporationgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $430k · revenue +44%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel

Philanthropy

Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation

Philanthropy

Zichron Avrohom Yosef

Philanthropy

Sherit Isroel

—

Ohel Yakov Foundation

—

American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah

—

Yakar Foundation Inc

—

American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International

Vaad Hapula Inc

Support jewry in Israel

Religion

Hahaim Yeshivat Shalom Inc

Education

Rinas Bais Yaakov Inc

Rinas bais yaakov, inc was established for the charitable purpose of promoting jewish education and jewish identity.

Arts & Culture

Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation

Philanthropy

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ahavat Yisroel Humanity Inc; the most unlike its peers is Children's Hospital Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

10/10

Grantees still filing

1/10

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$2,938,324Health$430,000Human Services$164,283Religion$150,969International$21,000Arts & Culture$13,000Community Improvement$5,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY21× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · Fjc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Beis Aharon VYisroel Inc DBA American Friends of Here Next Year funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Beis Aharon VYisroel Inc DBA American Friends of Here Next Year. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Beis Aharon VYisroel Inc DBA American Friends of Here Next Year?

Find your warmest path to Beis Aharon VYisroel Inc DBA American Friends of Here Next Year through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

Play a game based on Beis Aharon VYisroel Inc DBA American Friends of Here Next Year’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home