Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Begonia Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$120k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$332kHuman Services$205kEducation$73kHousing & Shelter$52kEnvironment$46kYouth Development$21kRecreation & Sports$11kCrime & Legal$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $77k
$6,050
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ETHOS MUSIC CENTER$22,500
Individual grant recipient$20,000
MASHUP ROCK AND ROLL MUSICAL$14,000
MICHIGAN MUSIC SCHOLARSHIP FUND$10,000
GENERATIONS AHEAD$10,000
CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES$7,500
MANISTEE COUNTY TOURISM AUTHORITY$6,050
CENTRAL LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$5,000
ESTIARY CENTER FOR LIVING & HEALING ARTS$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
TRAVERSE CITY AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS LEAP$5,000
BELLAIRE COMMUNITY YOUTH INITIATIVE$5,000
CROSSHATCH CENTER FOR ART AND ECOLOGY$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GENERATIONS AHEAD: $10k → 10%GENERATIONS AHEAD: $5k → 10%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $21k → 12%GENERATIONS AHEAD: $5k → 10%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $18k → 12%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $8k → 12%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $8k → 12%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$605k · 18 repeat orgs$151k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
20

Total granted

$605k
$110k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+20%

Still filing today

61%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Ethos Inc
    7× · 2017–2025 · $70k · revenue +39%
  • RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND
    5× · 2017–2023 · $60k · revenue +183%
  • NA
    NEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $52k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • TC
    TRAVERSE CITY TITONS ROWING
    one grant, 2019 · $11k
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NORTHWEST MICHIGAN
    one grant, 2023 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Great Lakes Center for the Arts

The Center's mission is to inspire, entertain, educate, and serve all in Northern Michigan year-round by presenting exceptional experiences across the full spectrum of the performing arts and offering impactful educational opportunities.

Arts & Culture
2
The Michigan Glass Project
Public Benefit
3
Harvest Theatre Company

Harvest Theatre Co is a professional theatre and training program for Flint youth ages 13-19 years old. We use the theatrical arts to instill confidence, self worth, and discipline in the most vulnerable population of our city. In 2022 we…

Arts & Culture
4
Kalamazoo Civic Theatre

The mission of the Kalamazoo Civic Theatre, with community partners and volunteers, is to create and deliver engaging, inspiring theatrical productions and educational experiences that spark delight, build community, encourage…

Unclassified
5
Community Pride Mi
Public Benefit
6
Mixed Blood Theatre Company

Mixed Blood Theatre Company uses theater to disrupt injustice. We are a social justice organization catalyzing action and change through art. Our work is guided by deep community engagement and rooted in radical hospitality.

7
All Ages Music Portland dba Friends of Noise

Friends of Noise is a non-profit organization built on the values of collectivism and restorative justice. We seek to transform the culture of BIPOC and LGBTQ+ youth access to the music industry. We foster a healthy ecosystem for all ages…

Arts & Culture
8
Neutral Zone

Neutral Zone is a transformative, youth-driven community where youth embrace their power, ignite their creativity, and launch their future to build equity, justice, and collective liberation.

Youth Development
9
Northwest Michigan Arts & Culture Network

The mission of the northwest michigan arts & culture network ("the network") is to harness the collective power of the creative sector to cultivate vibrant communities by strengthening the regional ecosystem that supports arts and culture.…

Arts & Culture
10
Good Luck Macbeth

Good luck Macbeth is a community where the theatrical arts and an integral aspect of life and the life of an artist is integral to the theatre. To bring that vision to reality. GLM aims to create relevant and impactful works of art that…

Education
11
Park City Presents

Park City Presents is on a mission to transform the narrative in Bridgeport through the power of creative arts and music by offering high-quality, immersive music tech educational opportunities to city youth and presenting live…

Arts & Culture
12
Traverse City Film Festival

The traverse city film festival is committed to showing just great movies and helping to save one of americas few indigenous art forms - the cinema. we are committed to showing great movies that both entertain and enlighten the audience.…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Old Town Playhouse Inc and the most unlike its peers is On the Ground. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES — $80,250 · OtherCHILD AND FAMILY SERVICESParallel 45 Inc — $55,000 · OtherParallel 45 IncESTIARY CENTER FOR LIVING & HEALING ARTS — $53,480 · OtherESTIARY CENTER FOR LIVING & HEALING ARTSNEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC — $51,500 · OtherNEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INCCENTRAL LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL — $25,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $20,000 · Other+23 more — $168,193 · Other+23 moreEthos Inc — $69,500 · Arts & CultureEthos IncCrosshatch Center for Art & Ecology — $36,500 · Arts & CultureCrosshatch Center for Art & …Traverse City Dance Project — $30,000 · Arts & CultureTraverse City Dance ProjectMASHUP ROCK & ROLL MUSICAL — $24,000 · Arts & CultureMASHUP ROCK & ROLL MUSICALThe Great Lakes Childrens Museum — $23,300 · Arts & CultureThe Great Lakes Childrens Mu…+1 more — $5,000 · Arts & CultureRAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND — $59,600 · Human ServicesRAPHAEL HOU…GENERATIONS AHEAD — $20,000 · Human ServicesGENERATIONS…MICHAEL'S PLACE — $5,000 · HealthNAMI OF WASHINGTON COUNTY — $5,000 · HealthOn The Ground — $4,000 · EnvironmentMUDD-NICK FOUNDATION — $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$473,523Arts & Culture$188,300Human Services$79,600Health$10,000Environment$4,000Philanthropy$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEthos Inc — $69,500 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetRAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND — $59,600 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetParallel 45 Inc — $55,000 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetNEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC — $51,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCrosshatch Center for Art & Ecology — $36,500 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetTraverse City Dance Project — $30,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetMASHUP ROCK & ROLL MUSICAL — $24,000 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetThe Great Lakes Childrens Museum — $23,300 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetGENERATIONS AHEAD — $20,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetTitle Track — $15,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetBELLAIRE COMMUNITY YOUTH INITIATIVE — $10,000 over 2y, 31% of budgetTRAVERSE BAY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOLD TOWN PLAYHOUSE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNAMI OF WASHINGTON COUNTY — $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetOn The Ground — $4,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetMUDD-NICK FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Ethos Inc
  • Who funds RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND
  • Who funds Parallel 45 Inc
  • Who funds NEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC
  • Who funds Crosshatch Center for Art & Ecology
  • Who funds Traverse City Dance Project
  • Who funds MASHUP ROCK & ROLL MUSICAL
  • Who funds The Great Lakes Childrens Museum
  • Who funds GENERATIONS AHEAD
  • Who funds Title Track
  • Who funds BELLAIRE COMMUNITY YOUTH INITIATIVE
  • Who funds TRAVERSE BAY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER
  • Who funds MICHAEL'S PLACE
  • Who funds OLD TOWN PLAYHOUSE INC
  • Who funds NAMI OF WASHINGTON COUNTY
  • Who funds On The Ground

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rotary Charities of Traverse CityMI24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rotary Charities of Traverse City · Grand Traverse Regional Community Foundation · Green Brick Foundation Inc · Oleson Foundation · Les & Ann Biederman Foundation Inc · The Art and Mary Schmuckal Family Foundation · Canton Community Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Begonia Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Raphael House of Portland12% of income from government
  • New Avenues for Youth Inc12% of income from government
  • Ethos Inc9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph