Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bearden Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$135k
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$620kYouth Development$75kRecreation & Sports$55kEnvironment$28kArts & Culture$26kAnimals$21kInternational$5kPublic Benefit$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k32 grants · $91k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $44k
$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$6.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMP FOR ALL$20,000
TEXAS APARTMENT ASSOCIATION EDUCATION FOUNDATION$12,000
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY$12,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS$9,750
UH ARMY ROTC$7,500
TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY$7,500
TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY$6,500
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON - CLEAR LAKE$6,000
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS$5,250
Individual grant recipient$5,000
BOWDOIN COLLEGE$4,000
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON$3,750
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY - GALVESTON$3,250
SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY$3,000
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON - VICTORIA$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ROCKPORT-FULTON GOOD SAMARITANS INC: $100 → 17%ROCKPORT-FULTON GOOD SAMARITANS INC: $100 → 17%BE A BLAKE FOUNDATION: $3k → 16%BE A BLAKE FOUNDATION: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
MN
MA
IA
IN
CT
UT
NE
MO
VA
AR
DC
LA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$890k · 45 repeat orgs$71k to everyone else

45 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
18

Total granted

$890k
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+16%

Still filing today

40%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentPublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesEnvironmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Camp For All Foundation
    6× · 2020–2025 · $80k · revenue +547%
  • RF
    RAZORBACK FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $45k · revenue +95%
  • BC
    Bowdoin College
    5× · 2021–2025 · $33k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
    one grant, 2019 · $8k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA
    one grant, 2019 · $7k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uatx

Uatx is a nonprofit dedicated to building a liberal arts university committed to freedom of inquiry, freedom of conscience, and civil discourse. to maintain these principles, the university will be fiercely independent financially,…

Education
2
Texas Academy of Medicine Engineering Science and Technology

To provide broader recognition of the state's top achievers in medicine, engineering and science, and to build a stronger identity for texas as an important destination and center of achievement in these fields.

Health
3
Texas Medical Association

The texas medical association (tma), the nation's largest and one of the oldest state medical societies, represents over 59,000 physicians and medical students dedicated to enhancing the health of all texans. in collaboration with 110…

—
4
University of Southern Mississippi Foundation

To build relationships with alumni and friends in order to secure private funds and other resources for the benefit of the university of southern mississippi (usm). the foundation receives, invests and distributes private gifts in support…

Education
5
South Texas College of Law Houston Inc

South texas college of law houston provides a diverse body of students the opportunity to obtain an exceptional legal education, preparing graduates to serve their community and profession with distinction.

Education
6
The Association of Former Students of Texas a&M University

To strengthen the association of former students, promote the interests and welfare of texas a&m university, perpetuate ties of affection and esteem formed in university or college days, and serve the student body.

Education
7
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
8
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
9
Hardin-Simmons University

The mission of hardin-simmons university is to be a community dedicated to providing excellence in education enlightened by christian faith and values.

Education
10
Wayland Baptist University

Wayland baptist university exists to educate students in an academically challenging, learning focused and distinctively christian environment for professional success and service to god and humankind.

Education
11
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc

Embry-riddle is the world leader in aviation and aerospace higher education. its mission is to teach the science, practice and business of aviation and aerospace, preparing students for productive careers and leadership roles in business,…

Education
12
Baylor Oral Health Foundation

The baylor oral health foundation was established to foster and support the activities and program of the texas a&m university college of dentistry (the college) to provide financial support for excellence at the college, and to advance…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Edwards University; the most unlike its peers is The Dartmouth Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON: $106,903 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF HOUSTONUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS: $90,275 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSASTEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $76,228 · OtherTEXAS A&M UNIVERSITYTEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $40,000 · OtherTEXAS STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA: $29,000 · OtherMISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY: $28,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS: $25,500 · OtherTHE DARTMOUTH INC: $24,138 · Other+52 more: $296,855 · Other+52 moreRAZORBACK FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 · EducationRAZORBACK FOU…Bowdoin College: $33,000 · EducationBowdoin Colle…St Edwards University: $19,250 · EducationSt Edwards Un…TEXAS APARTMENT ASSOCIATION EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $12,000 · EducationTEXAS APARTME…HOUSTON APARTMENT FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · EducationCamp For All Foundation: $80,000 · Youth DevelopmentCamp For Al…FORT SMITH BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS: $17,500 · Youth DevelopmentFORT SMITH …WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $15,000 · EnvironmentHOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $15,000 · AnimalsBeloved and Beyond: $12,500 · Recreation & SportsSOUTH AFRICA PARTNERS INC: $5,000 · International
Other$716,899Education$114,250Youth Development$97,500Environment$15,000Animals$15,000Recreation & Sports$12,500International$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCamp For All Foundation: $80,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetRAZORBACK FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBowdoin College: $33,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DARTMOUTH INC: $24,138 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetSt Edwards University: $19,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFORT SMITH BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS: $17,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBeloved and Beyond: $12,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSt Mary's University: $8,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH AFRICA PARTNERS INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSTON APARTMENT FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBEABLAKE FOUNDATION: $4,250 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCKSPRINGS EDWARDS COUNTY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $450 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSUTTON COUNTY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $400 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetEDWARD COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROCKPORT-FULTON GOOD SAMARINC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLamar Volunteer Fire Department Inc: $150 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Camp For All Foundation ↗
  • Who funds RAZORBACK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Bowdoin College ↗
  • Who funds THE DARTMOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds St Edwards University ↗
  • Who funds FORT SMITH BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds Beloved and Beyond ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS APARTMENT ASSOCIATION EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds St Mary's University ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH AFRICA PARTNERS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO4.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bearden Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bearden Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 42%
  • South Africa Partners Inc: 42% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bearden’s filings →

More from the funding graph