Skip to content
Beachley Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Beachley Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$22k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$87kReligion$27kArts & Culture$16kHealth$15kHuman Services$13kPhilanthropy$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$200Community Improvement$150Other$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$341k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HAGERSTOWN CHURCH OF THE BRETHREN$5,332
HAGERSTOWN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC$5,000
JUNIATA COLLEGE$3,000
HAGERSTOWN COMMUNITY CONCERT ASSOCIATION$2,500
THE ARC OF WASHINGTON COUNTY$2,000
MARYLAND SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$1,500
ROTARY FOUNDATION OF HAGERSTOWN MARYLAND$1,350
THE MARYLAND THEATRE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YMCA: $750 → 12%YMCA: $500 → 12%YMCA: $500 → 12%YMCA: $500 → 12%THE ARC OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $2k → 12%THE ARC OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $2k → 12%THE ARC OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $2k → 12%THE ARC OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $2k → 12%THE ARC OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$158k · 11 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against -39% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
10

Total granted

$158k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
-39%

Still filing today

55%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JC
    JUNIATA COLLEGE
    6× · 2019–2025 · $65k · revenue +24%
  • BH
    BROOKES HOUSE INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $12k · revenue +220%
  • AO
    ARC OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $10k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • TA
    THE ARC OF WASHINGTON CO
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • CC
    COMMUNITY CONCERT ASSOCATION
    one grant, 2021 · $500
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Womens Club At Hagerstown Inc

Promote and provide social activities for members

—
2
Washington College

Washington college challenges and inspires emerging citizen leaders to discover lives of purpose and passion.core valueswe share these values of our founding patron, george washington: integrity, determination, curiosity, civility,…

Education
3
Washington County Chamber of Commerce Inc

The organization provides programs and services that meet the business and professional needs of its members while promoting efforts to make the community a great place to live and work.

—
4
Howard County Chamber of Commerce

To represent the business community of howard county, maryland

—
5
Maryland Club

Promotion of social intercourse among its members & extension of hospitable courtesies to strangers.

—
6
Hudson Valley Community College Foundation

To receive and maintain funds to aid and advance the welfare, development, purposes and programs of hudson valley community college, its students and alumni.

Education
7
Hh Medstar Health Inc

Plan, develop, coordinate, direct and manage an integrated healthcare system.

Health
8
Harvard Club of Washington Dc

To inform and enrich the intellectual lives of 20,000 alumni of harvard university in the washington, dc area and to assist harvard university with respect to applicants and undergraduates from the dc area.

Education
9
Shriver Hall Concert Series Inc

Shriver hall concert series's mission is to enrich the baltimore community through outstanding chamber music and recital experiences.

Arts & Culture
10
Wmc-New York Inc

Wmc new york, inc. shall at all times be operated exclusively for charitable, scientific, and educational purposes within the meaning of section 170(c)(2)(b) and 501(c)(3) of the code, and for the purpose of engaging in various activities…

Health
11
Johns Hopkins Home Health Services Inc

Provision of home health services including community outreach programs with an emphasis on detection and prevention of common illnesses and disease.

Health
12
Hospice of Washington County Inc

To work together with our interdisciplinary team to provide quality, coordinated, comprehensive patient and family-centered care that addresses the physical, spiritual, emotional and practical needs of our patients. we encourage our…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maryland Symphony Orchestra Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ymca of Cumberland Maryland Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JUNIATA COLLEGE: $65,000 · EducationJUNIATA COLLEGEHAGERSTOWN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $20,300 · EducationHAGERSTOWN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCHAGERSTOWN CHURCH OF THE BRETHREN: $27,132 · OtherHAGERSTOWN CHURCH OF THE BRETHRENMARYLAND SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $8,000 · OtherMARYLAND SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INCROTARY FOUNDATION OF HAGERSTOWN MARYLAND: $5,260 · OtherROTARY FOUNDATION OF HAGERSTOWN MAR…THE MARYLAND THEATRE: $5,000 · OtherTHE MARYLAND THEATREHCC FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Other+8 more: $4,100 · Other+8 moreBROOKES HOUSE INC: $12,000 · Health+1 more: $350 · HealthARC OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesYMCA OF CUMBERLAND MARYLAND INC: $2,250 · Human ServicesHAGERSTOWN COMMUNITY CONCERT ASSN INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureWOMEN'S CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $250 · Arts & CultureSHEPHERD'S SPRING INC: $311 · Religion
Education$85,300Other$51,492Health$12,350Human Services$12,250Arts & Culture$2,750Religion$311

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJUNIATA COLLEGE: $65,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHAGERSTOWN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $20,300 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBROOKES HOUSE INC: $12,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetARC OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMARYLAND SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $8,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHAGERSTOWN COMMUNITY CONCERT ASSN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetYMCA OF CUMBERLAND MARYLAND INC: $2,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSHEPHERD'S SPRING INC: $311 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JUNIATA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds HAGERSTOWN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BROOKES HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds ARC OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds MARYLAND SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds HAGERSTOWN COMMUNITY CONCERT ASSN INC ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF CUMBERLAND MARYLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds MERITUS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHEPHERD'S SPRING INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S CLUB FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…The John R Hershey an…The Jone L Bowman Fou…Michael G Callas Char…Nora Roberts Foundati…Holzapfel Family Char…Alice V & David W Fle…The Hamilton Family F…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Community Foundation of Washington County Maryland IncMD20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Washington County Maryland Inc · The John R Hershey and Anna L Hershey Family Foundation Inc · The Jone L Bowman Foundation Inc · Michael G Callas Charitable Trust · Nora Roberts Foundation · Holzapfel Family Charitable Foundation C/O James Holzapfel · Alice V & David W Fletcher Foundation Inc · The Hamilton Family Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Beachley Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Beachley Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 94%
  • Meritus Health Foundation Inc: 94% of income from government
  • Maryland Symphony Orchestra Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Beachley’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home