Skip to content
Bchb Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Bchb Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$1.2M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Community Improvement$4.3MEducation$3.5MHealth$530kInternational$423kRecreation & Sports$256kReligion$230kHuman Services$40kArts & Culture$36kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $51
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $342k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.6M
$83,456
Median grant
3
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEGACY HERITAGE PROJECT ACCELERATE$1,223,369
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$333,000
INTERNATIONAL MARCH OF THE LIVING$100,000
NATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC$83,456
AKIVA COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL$83,334
CHARLOTTE JEWISH DAY SCHOOL$75,000
LEGACY HERITAGE INVESTORS I LLC$51
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 65% of grant dollars ($6.1M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 35% that went abroad ($3.3M) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE RAYMOND AND RUTH PERELMAN JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $48k → 7%SOUTH PENINSULA HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $44k → 8%HEALTHCARE FOR ISRAEL INC: $80k → 14%ZEFAT ACADEMIC COLLEGE: $650k → 14%THE RELIGIOUS ZIONIST YOUTH MOVEMENT: $81k → 17%MERCAVA: $250k → 20%AKIVA COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL: $83k → 14%CHARLOTTE JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $75k → 10%AMUTAT NEGBA RESHSET BATIM HAMIM BES: $40k → 8%HALACHIC EDUCATION CENTER CORP: $23k → 7%GESHER JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $22k → 6%THE RAYMOND AND RUTH PERELMAN JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $18k → 7%SOUTH PENINSULA HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $43k → 8%ZEFAT ACADEMIC COLLEGE: $375k → 14%RELIGIOUS ZIONIST YOUTH MOVEMENT OF US: $61k → 17%MAGEN DAVID YESHIVA: $21k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $20k → 7%ZEFAT ACADEMIC COLLEGE: $375k → 14%THE RELIGIOUS ZIONIST YOUTH MOVEMENT: $9k → 17%ZEFAT ACADEMIC COLLEGE: $325k → 14%RELIGIOUS ZIONISTS OF AMERICA: $8k → 17%ZEFAT ACADEMIC COLLEGE: $325k → 14%YOUNG JUDAEA GLOBAL INC: $3k → 17%ZEFAT ACADEMIC COLLEGE: $325k → 14%LEGACY HERITAGE PROJECT ACCELERATE: $1.6M → 17%ZEFAT ACADEMIC COLLEGE: $325k → 14%LEGACY HERITAGE PROJECT ACCELERATE: $1.5M → 17%LEGACY HERITAGE PROJECT ACCELERATE: $1.2M → 17%FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH: $25k → 17%LEGACY HERITAGE PROGRAMMING XV LLC: $10k → 17%LEGACY HERITAGE INVESTORS I LLC: $587 → 17%MIKDASH - LEGACY HERITAGE PROGRAMMING XV LLC: $419 → 17%LEGACY HERITAGE INVESTORS I LLC: $51 → 17%LEGACY HERITAGE INVESTORS I LLC: $5 → 17%LEGACY HERITAGE INVESTORS I LLC: $1 → 17%NATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC: $155k → 17%NATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC: $83k → 17%NATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC: $18k → 17%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $333k → 17%UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM: $55k → 17%SEFARIA INC: $32k → 17%UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM: $10k → 17%INTERNATIONAL MARCH OF THE LIVING: $100k → 17%ORTHODOX JEWISH CONGREGATIONS OF AMERICA: $75k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 35% of all-years giving ($3.3M)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Israel$3.3M · 11 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.4M · 5 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
20

Total granted

$7.4M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+44%

Still filing today

20%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $258k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LH
    LEGACY HERITAGE PROJECT ACCELERATE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $4.3M
  • ZA
    ZEFAT ACADEMIC COLLEGE
    3× · 2020–2022 · $2.7M
  • NR
    NATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC
    2× · 2021–2024 · $256k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • CH
    CLALIT HEALTH SERVICES
    one grant, 2021 · $450k
  • MI
    MERCAVA INC
    one grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue -84% · 34% of their budget
  • RZ
    RELIGIOUS ZIONIST YOUTH MOVEMENT BNEI AKIVA OF THE US AND CANADA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $90k · revenue +47%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
3
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
4
Torah Temimah Jerusalem

The school trains advanced talmudic scholars, enabling them to become high level teachers and religious leaders in israel and the united states using specific methodology combining traditional talmudic study with innovative learning…

Education
5
University of Judaism Foundation
—
6
Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion
7
Bronfman Youth Fellowships to Israel in Inc
Youth Development
8
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
—
9
Yeshiva Har Torah

A religious school providing teaching facilities of jewish faith, history, literature, jewish life and ideals.

—
10
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
11
American Friends of Neveh Zion

To voluntarily assist the house of religious learning known as yeshiva neveh zion in israel

Religion
12
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Religious Zionist Youth Movement Bnei Akiva of the Us and Canada Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mercava Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LEGACY HERITAGE PROJECT ACCELERATE: $4,323,656 · OtherLEGACY HERITAGE PROJECT ACCELERATEZEFAT ACADEMIC COLLEGE: $2,700,000 · OtherZEFAT ACADEMIC COLLEGECLALIT HEALTH SERVICES: $450,000 · OtherCLALIT HEALTH SERVICES+13 more: $776,475 · Other+13 moreMERCAVA INC: $250,000 · EducationINTERNATIONAL MARCH OF THE LIVING I: $100,000 · EducationSouth Peninsula Hebrew Day School: $86,116 · EducationCHARLOTTE JEWISH DAY SCHOOL INC: $75,000 · EducationSEFARIA INC: $31,500 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SULAMOT CORP: $22,500 · EducationGesher School Inc: $21,885 · Education+1 more: $2,728 · EducationJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $333,000 · InternationalRELIGIOUS ZIONIST YOUTH MOVEMENT BNEI AKIVA OF THE US AND CANADA INC: $90,083 · InternationalHEALTHCARE FOR ISRAEL INC: $80,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $25,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$8,250,131Education$589,729International$423,083Philanthropy$100,000Arts & Culture$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $333,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC: $256,456 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetMERCAVA INC: $250,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MARCH OF THE LIVING I: $100,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetRELIGIOUS ZIONIST YOUTH MOVEMENT BNEI AKIVA OF THE US AND CANADA INC: $90,083 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSouth Peninsula Hebrew Day School: $86,116 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHEALTHCARE FOR ISRAEL INC: $80,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetCHARLOTTE JEWISH DAY SCHOOL INC: $75,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetRAYMOND AND RUTH PERELMAN JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $65,918 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSEFARIA INC: $31,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SULAMOT CORP: $22,500 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetGesher School Inc: $21,885 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRELIGIOUS ZIONISTS OF AMERICA MIZRACHI HAPOEL HAMIZRACHI INC: $7,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetYOUNG JUDAEA GLOBAL INC: $2,728 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fimf IncAhba IncVanguard Charitable E…Jewish Communal FundGs Donor Advised Phil…National Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
Fimf IncNY15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fimf Inc · Ahba Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bchb Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bchb Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bchb Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Bchb Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bchb’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home