· Private foundation
Bc & Addie Brookshire Kleberg County Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 75% of BC & ADDIE BROOKSHIRE KLEBERG COUNTY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $70k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $51,220 |
| CASA OF KLEBERG COUNTY | $15,000 |
| KINGSVILLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $15,000 |
| BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA | $10,000 |
| COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| KLEBERG COUNTY CHILD WELFARE BOARD | $10,000 |
| FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE | $10,000 |
| HM KING HIGH SCHOOL | $8,000 |
| TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY-KINGSVILLE | $5,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $59k) land where the poverty rate runs at 27%, against an area that typically sits at 30%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- COCASA OF KLEBERG COUNTY9× · 2017–2025 · $105k · revenue +83%
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF KINGSVILLE INC7× · 2017–2023 · $73k · revenue +57%
- FCFAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE8× · 2017–2025 · $59k · revenue +35%
Funded once
- RIRICARDO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICTone grant, 2019 · $20k
- CSCHRISTUS SPOHN HOSPITAL - KLEBERGone grant, 2020 · $10k
- CPCHARLIES PLACE RECOVERY CENTERone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -96%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization is dedicated to improving the welfare of homeless, unwanted, and neglected animals found throughout Kingsville and other parts of the county.
After School Progam
Counseling women with crisis pregnancies.
The provision of services to kinship families and caregivers.
Youth based center
Counseling and related support services for pregnant women.
Assist those suffering from alchoholism
To combat juvenile delinquency and community deterioration
Youth services, supporting, helping, and assisting youth
To provide assistance support, counseling and educational programs for cancer patients and their families.
Substance Abuse Programs
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Douglass Youth Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Charlies Place Recovery Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CASA OF KLEBERG COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Kingsville Symphony Orchestra Society ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF KINGSVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE ↗
- Who funds DOUGLASS YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CHARLIES PLACE RECOVERY CENTER ↗
- Who funds Friends of the John E Conner Museum ↗
- Who funds KLEBERG COUNTY PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Share Association ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Celanese Foundation · Ed Rachal Foundation · Coastal Bend Community Foundation · King Ranch Family Trust · United Way of the Coastal Bend Inc · The John G and Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Bc & Addie Brookshire Kleberg County Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.