Skip to content

· Public charity

Baylor University

The mission of BAYLOR UNIVERSITY is to educate men and women for worldwide leadership and service by integrating academic excellence and christian commitment within a caring community.

$443M
Granted FY2025still arriving
97
Grants FY2025still arriving
29
States reached
$2.5M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Science & Tech$90MCommunity Improvement$23MEmployment$17MHealth$5.0MArts & Culture$1.7MSocial Science$818kEducation$653kReligion$269kOther$0
02FY2025 · 97 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 97 grants below total $8,575,016, the rows itemized in this filing. The $442,533,209 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $433,958,193 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $66k
  • $10k–50k52 grants · $1.3M
  • $50k–250k29 grants · $2.2M
  • $250k+7 grants · $4.9M
$38,898
Median grant
29
States reached
$4.4B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Gallup Inc$2,450,127
HARVARD UNIVERSITY$561,109
Waco Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Collaborative Inc$550,000
UTSA$421,589
Center for Open Science$333,284
Texas A&M Sponsored Research Services$321,216
Virginia Tech$293,821
Brazos Valley Public Broadcasting$159,101
University of Texas At Austin$158,207
Colorado State University$121,120
Wheaton College$120,974
Hampton University$107,003
Georgia Tech Research Corp$89,236
Texas A&M Sponsored Research Services$84,575
Purdue University$82,340
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $81k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BRAZORIA COUNTY DREAM CENTER: $12k → 10%ELIJAH RISING: $7k → 16%CASA OF MCLENNAN COUNTY: $15k → 16%COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF THE HEART OF TEXAS: $15k → 16%CARITAS OF WACO: $6k → 16%CASA of McLennan County: $16k → 16%TEXAS CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NETWORK: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$117M · 101 repeat orgs$20M to everyone else

101 repeat relationships: 43 still active in FY2025, 58 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

101
99

Total granted

$117M
$19M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+44%

Still filing today

56%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementReligionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    PEPSICO FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $21M · revenue ×58
  • BC
    Baylor College of Medicine
    2× · 2017–2018 · $4.0M · revenue +67%
  • BRAZOS VALLEY PUBLIC BROADCASTING FOUNDA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +14% · 30% of their budget

Funded once

  • CD
    Chartwells Dining Services
    one grant, 2021 · $17M
  • BI
    Brazos Innovation Partners
    one grant, 2024 · $156k
  • TA
    TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $151k · revenue +69%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
2
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
5
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
6
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
7
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
8
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
9
Houston Christian University

The mission of houston christian university is to provide a learning experience that instills in students a passion for academic, spiritual, and professional excellence as a result of our central confession, "jesus christ is lord."

—
10
Taylor University

The mission of Taylor University is to develop servant-leaders marked with a passion to minister Christ's redemptive love, grace, and truth to a world in need.

Education
11
Texas Wesleyan University

Texas wesleyan university, guided by its deep methodist heritage, provides transformational learning experiences and research opportunities to a diverse group of students to develop their full potential as individuals and as members of the…

Education
12
Uatx

Uatx is a nonprofit dedicated to building a liberal arts university committed to freedom of inquiry, freedom of conscience, and civil discourse. to maintain these principles, the university will be fiercely independent financially,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wheaton College; the most unlike its peers is Pepsico Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

127 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 127 of the 237 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
30
Early backer (in before they grew)
125/127
Grantees still filing
86/127
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

McLane Global: $65,066,264 · OtherMcLane GlobalPEPSICO FOUNDATION INC: $21,026,946 · OtherPEPSICO FOUNDATION INCChartwells Dining Services: $16,659,225 · OtherChartwells Dining ServicesGallup Inc: $7,423,934 · OtherGallup Inc+136 more: $13,412,916 · Other+136 moreBaylor College of Medicine: $4,000,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $1,504,884 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $439,917 · EducationHOPE COLLEGE: $436,190 · Education+34 more: $2,506,301 · EducationTHE URBAN INSTITUTE: $2,215,972 · Social ScienceBRAZOS VALLEY PUBLIC BROADCASTING FOUNDA: $1,580,828 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $44,700 · Arts & CultureWACO ENTREPRENEURIAL ECOSYSTEM COLLABORATIVE INC: $1,250,000 · Community ImprovementTALITHA KOUM INSTITUTE: $91,440 · Community Improvement+4 more: $96,300 · Community ImprovementBaylor Research Institute: $550,992 · HealthGEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION: $216,147 · HealthTEXAS ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $151,033 · HealthTHE QUEEN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $111,518 · HealthWACO FAMILY PRACTICE FOUNDATION: $100,000 · HealthScott & White Memorial Hospital: $52,980 · Health+4 more: $45,346 · HealthCENTER FOR OPEN SCIENCE INC: $741,799 · Science & TechUniversity of Kansas Center for Research Inc: $47,000 · Science & TechWOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION: $33,065 · Science & Tech
Other$123,589,285Education$8,887,292Social Science$2,215,972Arts & Culture$1,625,528Community Improvement$1,437,740Health$1,228,016Science & Tech$821,864

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPEPSICO FOUNDATION INC: $21,026,946 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $4,000,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE URBAN INSTITUTE: $2,215,972 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetBRAZOS VALLEY PUBLIC BROADCASTING FOUNDA: $1,580,828 over 9y, 30% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $1,504,884 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWACO ENTREPRENEURIAL ECOSYSTEM COLLABORATIVE INC: $1,250,000 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetCENTER FOR OPEN SCIENCE INC: $741,799 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetWACO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $635,174 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetBaylor Research Institute: $550,992 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $439,917 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE COLLEGE: $436,190 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $259,928 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $218,849 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION: $216,147 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $190,369 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $151,033 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetTEXAS IMPACT: $148,719 over 1y, 55% of budgetNATIONAL CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE INC: $136,593 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAnselm House: $121,800 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetWheaton College: $120,974 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $119,283 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRELIGIOUS FREEDOM INSTITUTE INC: $118,500 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetTHE QUEEN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $111,518 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $111,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $108,741 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHAMPTON UNIVERSITY: $107,003 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWACO FAMILY PRACTICE FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetHAWAII PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $93,699 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTALITHA KOUM INSTITUTE: $91,440 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $84,017 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES CORPORATION AT CSUSB: $81,263 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $76,625 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWACO FOUNDATION: $76,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY: $73,267 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAROLINA CHRISTIAN STUDY CENTER INC: $69,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetLUMEN CHRISTI INSTITUTE: $69,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCHESTERTON HOUSE INC: $69,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetCollegium Institute: $69,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetCONSORTIUM OF CHRISTIAN STUDY CENTERS: $69,000 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetFULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $66,398 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $59,374 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $57,832 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFUZZY FRIENDS RESCUE: $55,500 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetUNITED STATES ASSOCIATION FOR SMALL BUSINESS AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP: $55,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetScott & White Memorial Hospital: $52,980 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COVE - HEART OF TEXAS INC: $51,500 over 4y, 7.2% of budgetVanderbilt University: $51,458 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $50,052 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PEPSICO FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
  • Who funds THE URBAN INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds BRAZOS VALLEY PUBLIC BROADCASTING FOUNDA ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds WACO ENTREPRENEURIAL ECOSYSTEM COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR OPEN SCIENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds WACO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds Baylor Research Institute ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds HOPE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Waco FoundationTX53.4× affinity24 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Waco Foundation · Cooper Foundation · United Way of Waco-McLennan County · Bernard & Audre Rapoport Foundation · Clifton Foundation · National Collegiate Athletic Association · The Fentress Foundation · Ascension Providence · Folds of Honor Foundation · Margaret Cb & S Spencer N Brown Foundation Inc · American Chemical Society · Once Upon a Time Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Baylor University funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Baylor University. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution: 63% of income from government
  • University of Delaware: 30% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Northeastern University: 7% of income from government
  • Seton Hall University: 1% of income from government
  • Aacsb International - the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 237 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Baylor University’s filings →

More from the funding graph