Skip to content

· Private foundation

Baxley Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$178k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$358kEducation$299kHealth$158kHuman Services$153kReligion$78kRecreation & Sports$66kEnvironment$49kAnimals$35kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $52k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $126k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC$36,000
GIGI'S PLAYHOUSE ANAPOLIS$35,000
THE CALL$35,000
WARREN WILSON COLLEGE$10,000
GENESIS CENTER NORTH TEXAS$10,000
PRESTONWOOD CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$9,000
PRINCE OF PEACE CATHOLIC SCHOOL$7,000
ABIDING LOVE CHARITIES$7,000
CRU$5,000
TERRY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$5,000
SAINT MICHAEL'S EPISCOPAL CATHEDRAL$5,000
THE RIDGE PRESCHOOL$3,000
MCCALL WINTER SPORTS CLUB$3,000
BOISE BICYCLE PROJECT$2,500
ST JOSEPH'S CATHOLIC SCHOOL$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ABIDING LOVE CHARITIES: $8k → 14%ABIDING LOVE CHARITIES: $8k → 14%ABIDING LOVE CHARITIES: $7k → 14%ABIDING LOVE CHARITIES: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MA
OR
CA
UT
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AR
NC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 26 repeat orgs$132k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
25

Total granted

$1.1M
$93k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+34%

Still filing today

50%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationRecreation & SportsEnvironmentHousing & ShelterHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL AR FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $190k · revenue +9%
  • CC
    CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY CARE CLINIC
    4× · 2017–2022 · $126k · revenue +4% · 59% of their budget
  • TC
    THE CALL
    6× · 2017–2024 · $99k · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • AA
    ADVENTURE APPALACHIA
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
  • CD
    COALFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $6k · revenue +233%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
2
Humane Society of South Mississippi

The mission of the humane society is to save and enhance the lives of pets through cooperative and innovative approaches to adoption, spay/neuter, sheltering and community engagement.

Animals
3
Adaptive Sports Center of Crested Butte Inc

The adaptive sports center enriches the lives of people with disabilities and other specific needs through exceptional outdoor adventures. the successful programs the asc provides are inclusive to families and friends, empower our…

—
4
Michigan Anti-Cruelty Society

To maintain and operate a hospital, ambulance and veterinary services for the care of animals. the maintenance and operation of kennels and suitable chambers for the humane destruction of wounded animals.

Animals
5
Nevada Humane Society

To care for pets, find them homes and save lives.

Animals
6
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
7
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
8
Cultivate Kansas City Inc

Grow food, farms and community in support of a sustainable, healthy and local food system.

Food & Nutrition
9
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
10
Tenngreen Land Conservancy

The organization's primary mission is conserving land where people and nature can thrive by creating green corridors linking existing public lands using conservation easments and outright purchase.

Recreation & Sports
11
Southeast Kansas Community Action P

Addressing the causes and effects of poverty by uniting staff, individuals, families, and community partners to provide quality, comprehensive services through compassionate, respectful relationships.

Community Improvement
12
Nashville Safe Haven Family Shelter Inc

Lead our community's efforts to house, support, empower and advocate for families experiencing homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stageone Family Theatre Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kentucky Mountain Bike Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
17/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GIGI'S PLAYHOUSE ANAPOLIS: $226,000 · OtherGIGI'S PLAYHOUSE ANAPOLISGIGIS PLAYHOUSE INC: $72,000 · OtherGIGIS PLAYHOUSE INCPRINCE OF PEACE CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $56,000 · OtherPRINCE OF PEACE CATHOLIC SCHOOLGIGI'S PLAYHOUSE LITTLE ROCK: $48,000 · OtherGIGI'S PLAYHOUSE LITTLE ROCKTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $45,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYSAINT MICHAEL'S EPISCOPAL CATHEDRAL: $35,000 · Other+37 more: $222,000 · Other+37 moreUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL AR FOUNDATION INC: $190,138 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CENTR…SONSHINE ACADEMY CHEER BOOSTER CLUB: $11,000 · EducationWARREN WILSON COLLEGE: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $3,000 · EducationCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY CARE CLINIC: $126,000 · HealthCHRISTIAN COM…EASTER SEALS DELAWARE & MARYLAND'S EASTERN SHORE INC: $27,000 · HealthEASTER SEALS …THE CALL: $99,000 · Human ServicesTHE CALLAbiding Love Charities Inc: $26,000 · Human ServicesAbiding Lov…Kentucky Mountain Bike Association: $16,000 · EnvironmentFOOTPRINTS RUNNING LTD: $4,000 · EnvironmentGENESIS CENTER NORTH TEXAS INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterCOALFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $6,000 · Housing & ShelterMCCALL WINTER SPORTS CLUB INC: $9,000 · Recreation & SportsOCEAN PINES SWIM TEAM INC: $6,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$704,000Education$214,138Health$153,000Human Services$125,000Environment$20,000Housing & Shelter$16,000Recreation & Sports$15,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL AR FOUNDATION INC: $190,138 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY CARE CLINIC: $126,000 over 4y, 59% of budgetTHE CALL: $99,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $45,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS DELAWARE & MARYLAND'S EASTERN SHORE INC: $27,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAbiding Love Charities Inc: $26,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetNORTHEAST ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRANKLIN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $13,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSTAGEONE FAMILY THEATRE INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSONSHINE ACADEMY CHEER BOOSTER CLUB: $11,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetWARREN WILSON COLLEGE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGENESIS CENTER NORTH TEXAS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMCCALL WINTER SPORTS CLUB INC: $9,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetCAMP SUMMIT INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOCEAN PINES SWIM TEAM INC: $6,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetCOALFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOISE BICYCLE PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFOOTPRINTS RUNNING LTD: $4,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetC5 Youth Foundation of Texas Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SALINE COUNTY ARKANSAS: $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBLACK GIRLS CODE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSALINE COUNTY SAFE HAVEN INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF WICOMICO COUNTY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL AR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY CARE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds THE CALL ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS DELAWARE & MARYLAND'S EASTERN SHORE INC ↗
  • Who funds Abiding Love Charities Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST ANIMAL SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Kentucky Mountain Bike Association ↗
  • Who funds FRANKLIN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds STAGEONE FAMILY THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds SONSHINE ACADEMY CHEER BOOSTER CLUB ↗
  • Who funds WARREN WILSON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds GENESIS CENTER NORTH TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds MCCALL WINTER SPORTS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP SUMMIT INC ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN PINES SWIM TEAM INC ↗
  • Who funds COALFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds BOISE BICYCLE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOTPRINTS RUNNING LTD ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arkansas Community Foundation IncAR12.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Baxley Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Baxley Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Baxley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph