Skip to content

· Public charity

Battle on Bago Foundation Inc

To support area youth and conservation efforts throughout the state of wisconsin.

$99k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$267kYouth Development$224kInternational$31kPublic Safety & Disaster$22kCommunity Improvement$8kEducation$7k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $31,278, the rows itemized in this filing. The $98,604 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $67,326 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
$6,175
Median grant
1
States reached
$608k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JUNIOR PATRIOTS BASEBALL$14,275
OSHKOSH WEST BOOSTER CLUB INC$6,175
OSHKOSH SOUTHWEST ROTARY$5,428
LITTLE LAKE MEMORIES$5,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LITTLE LAKE MEMORIES: $5k → 11%LITTLE LAKE MEMORIES: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$517k · 14 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
6

Total granted

$517k
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+70%

Still filing today

29%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    OTTER STREET FISHING CLUB
    5× · 2018–2022 · $89k
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OSHKOSH INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $76k · revenue +54%
  • JP
    JUNIOR PATRIOTS BASEBALL CLUB INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $76k

Funded once

  • WC
    WINNECONNE COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
  • CO
    CITY OF OSHKOSH
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
  • TA
    TOMORROWS ANGLERS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $7k · revenue -11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oshkosh West Basketball Club Inc

Provide youth the opportunity to learn, play and compete in competitive basketball situations. Approximately 225 kids from the Oshkosh area participate annually. The club also provides financial assistance to the Oshkosh West High School…

Recreation & Sports
2
Old Timers Athletic Club Inc

This club was organized to promote a spirit of cooperation amoung the members, with particular interest on promotion of organized youth sporting activities

Recreation & Sports
3
Optimist Club Foundation of Fond du Lac
Education
4
Osceola County Sportsmans Club

To provide activities which focus on hunting and fishing safety issues for all ages. preserve and protect wildlife.

—
5
Oakland Jr Grizzlies Hockey Club
Recreation & Sports
6
Oregon Hockey Boosters Inc

Support and promote hockey in oregon, wi

Recreation & Sports
7
Oshkosh Football Group Inc

Prepare youth for, and administer, organized amateur football competitions

Recreation & Sports
8
Oshkosh Tavern League Foundation Inc

To oversee the charitable side of the Oshkosh Tavern League including the Saferide Program and other charitable donations as directed

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Oconomowoc Rotary Charitable Foundation Inc

To solicit, invest and expend endowment funds and other gifts, exclusively for charitable and educational programs.

—
10
Oswego Hockey Inc

Charitable and educational encouragement and promotion of sportsmanship for high school hockey players in the state of illinois

Recreation & Sports
11
Aqua Skiers Inc

To promote safe water skiing practice, water/boat safety and community spirit. 35 of the members are high school age or younger. The team hosts clinics and promotes community pride.

Recreation & Sports
12
Friends of the Oshkosh Seniors Center Inc

Grants to the city of oshkosh for the purchase of equipment and services for the oshkosh senior center.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rotary International Oshkosh Attn Kathy Hanson; the most unlike its peers is Tomorrows Anglers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OTTER STREET FISHING CLUB: $89,480 · OtherOTTER STREET FISHING CLUBJUNIOR PATRIOTS BASEBALL CLUB INC: $75,774 · OtherJUNIOR PATRIOTS BASEBALL CLUB INCOSHKOSH YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION IN: $38,230 · OtherOSHKOSH YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INROTARY INTERNATIONAL OSHKOSH ATTN KATHY HANSON: $31,027 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONAL OSHKOSH ATTN KATHY HANSONQUINNEY FISHING CLUB: $25,858 · OtherQUINNEY FISHING CLUBPOYGAN CONSERVATION CLUB INC: $24,033 · OtherPOYGAN CONSERVATION CLUB INCAMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY: $22,254 · OtherAMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARYPAYNES POINT HOOK AND SPEAR CLUB: $17,100 · Other+5 more: $49,831 · Other+5 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OSHKOSH INC: $75,784 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB…TOMORROWS ANGLERS INC: $7,000 · Youth DevelopmentTOMORROWS ANGLERS…OSHKOSH KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $5,140 · Youth DevelopmentOSHKOSH KIDS FOUN…OSHKOSH WEST BOOSTER CLUB INC: $70,778 · EducationOSHKOSH WEST B…FIFTH QUARTER FOUNDATION INC: $11,400 · PhilanthropyLITTLE LAKES MEMORIES INC: $10,800 · Human ServicesOSHKOSH UNITED SOCCER CLUB: $5,028 · Recreation & Sports
Other$373,587Youth Development$87,924Education$70,778Philanthropy$11,400Human Services$10,800Recreation & Sports$5,028

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OSHKOSH INC: $75,784 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetOSHKOSH WEST BOOSTER CLUB INC: $70,778 over 8y, 67% of budgetOSHKOSH YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION IN: $38,230 over 6y, 5.7% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL OSHKOSH ATTN KATHY HANSON: $31,027 over 4y, 10% of budgetFIFTH QUARTER FOUNDATION INC: $11,400 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetLITTLE LAKES MEMORIES INC: $10,800 over 2y, 12% of budgetTOMORROWS ANGLERS INC: $7,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetOSHKOSH KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $5,140 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetOSHKOSH UNITED SOCCER CLUB: $5,028 over 1y, 1.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OSHKOSH INC ↗
  • Who funds OSHKOSH WEST BOOSTER CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds OSHKOSH YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION IN ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY INTERNATIONAL OSHKOSH ATTN KATHY HANSON ↗
  • Who funds FIFTH QUARTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE LAKES MEMORIES INC ↗
  • Who funds TOMORROWS ANGLERS INC ↗
  • Who funds OSHKOSH KIDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OSHKOSH UNITED SOCCER CLUB ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oshkosh Area Community Foundation CorporationWI15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oshkosh Area Community Foundation Corporation · Oshkosh Area United Way Inc · J J Keller Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Battle on Bago Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Battle on Bago Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Battle on Bago Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Battle on Bago Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Battle on Bago’s filings →

    More from the funding graph