Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Battle on Bago Foundation Inc

To support area youth and conservation efforts throughout the state of wisconsin.

$99k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Recreation & Sports$267kYouth Development$224kInternational$31kPublic Safety & Disaster$22kCommunity Improvement$8kEducation$7k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 4 grants below total $31,278 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $98,604 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $67,326 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
$6,175
Median grant
1
States reached
$608k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JUNIOR PATRIOTS BASEBALL$14,275
OSHKOSH WEST BOOSTER CLUB INC$6,175
OSHKOSH SOUTHWEST ROTARY$5,428
LITTLE LAKE MEMORIES$5,400
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LITTLE LAKE MEMORIES: $5k → 11%LITTLE LAKE MEMORIES: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$517k · 14 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
6

Total granted

$517k
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+70%

Still filing today

29%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    OTTER STREET FISHING CLUB
    5× · 2018–2022 · $89k
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OSHKOSH INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $76k · revenue +54%
  • JP
    JUNIOR PATRIOTS BASEBALL CLUB INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $76k

Funded once

  • WC
    WINNECONNE COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
  • CO
    CITY OF OSHKOSH
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
  • TA
    TOMORROWS ANGLERS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $7k · revenue -11%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oshkosh West Basketball Club Inc

Provide youth the opportunity to learn, play and compete in competitive basketball situations. Approximately 225 kids from the Oshkosh area participate annually. The club also provides financial assistance to the Oshkosh West High School…

Recreation & Sports
2
Old Timers Athletic Club Inc

This club was organized to promote a spirit of cooperation amoung the members, with particular interest on promotion of organized youth sporting activities

Recreation & Sports
3
Optimist Club Foundation of Fond du Lac
Education
4
Osceola County Sportsmans Club

To provide activities which focus on hunting and fishing safety issues for all ages. preserve and protect wildlife.

5
Oakland Jr Grizzlies Hockey Club
Recreation & Sports
6
Oregon Hockey Boosters Inc

Support and promote hockey in oregon, wi

Recreation & Sports
7
Oshkosh Football Group Inc

Prepare youth for, and administer, organized amateur football competitions

Recreation & Sports
8
Oshkosh Tavern League Foundation Inc

To oversee the charitable side of the Oshkosh Tavern League including the Saferide Program and other charitable donations as directed

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Oconomowoc Rotary Charitable Foundation Inc

To solicit, invest and expend endowment funds and other gifts, exclusively for charitable and educational programs.

10
Oswego Hockey Inc

Charitable and educational encouragement and promotion of sportsmanship for high school hockey players in the state of illinois

Recreation & Sports
11
Aqua Skiers Inc

To promote safe water skiing practice, water/boat safety and community spirit. 35 of the members are high school age or younger. The team hosts clinics and promotes community pride.

Recreation & Sports
12
Friends of the Oshkosh Seniors Center Inc

Grants to the city of oshkosh for the purchase of equipment and services for the oshkosh senior center.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rotary International Oshkosh Attn Kathy Hanson and the most unlike its peers is Tomorrows Anglers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OTTER STREET FISHING CLUB — $89,480 · OtherOTTER STREET FISHING CLUBJUNIOR PATRIOTS BASEBALL CLUB INC — $75,774 · OtherJUNIOR PATRIOTS BASEBALL CLUB INCOSHKOSH YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION IN — $38,230 · OtherOSHKOSH YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INROTARY INTERNATIONAL OSHKOSH ATTN KATHY HANSON — $31,027 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONAL OSHKOSH ATTN KATHY HANSONQUINNEY FISHING CLUB — $25,858 · OtherQUINNEY FISHING CLUBPOYGAN CONSERVATION CLUB INC — $24,033 · OtherPOYGAN CONSERVATION CLUB INCAMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY — $22,254 · OtherAMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARYPAYNES POINT HOOK AND SPEAR CLUB — $17,100 · Other+5 more — $49,831 · Other+5 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OSHKOSH INC — $75,784 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB…TOMORROWS ANGLERS INC — $7,000 · Youth DevelopmentTOMORROWS ANGLERS…OSHKOSH KIDS FOUNDATION INC — $5,140 · Youth DevelopmentOSHKOSH KIDS FOUN…OSHKOSH WEST BOOSTER CLUB INC — $70,778 · EducationOSHKOSH WEST B…FIFTH QUARTER FOUNDATION INC — $11,400 · PhilanthropyLITTLE LAKES MEMORIES INC — $10,800 · Human ServicesOSHKOSH UNITED SOCCER CLUB — $5,028 · Recreation & Sports
Other$373,587Youth Development$87,924Education$70,778Philanthropy$11,400Human Services$10,800Recreation & Sports$5,028

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OSHKOSH INC — $75,784 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetOSHKOSH WEST BOOSTER CLUB INC — $70,778 over 8y, 67% of budgetOSHKOSH YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION IN — $38,230 over 6y, 5.7% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL OSHKOSH ATTN KATHY HANSON — $31,027 over 4y, 10% of budgetFIFTH QUARTER FOUNDATION INC — $11,400 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetLITTLE LAKES MEMORIES INC — $10,800 over 2y, 12% of budgetTOMORROWS ANGLERS INC — $7,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetOSHKOSH KIDS FOUNDATION INC — $5,140 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetOSHKOSH UNITED SOCCER CLUB — $5,028 over 1y, 1.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OSHKOSH INC
  • Who funds OSHKOSH WEST BOOSTER CLUB INC
  • Who funds OSHKOSH YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION IN
  • Who funds ROTARY INTERNATIONAL OSHKOSH ATTN KATHY HANSON
  • Who funds FIFTH QUARTER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds LITTLE LAKES MEMORIES INC
  • Who funds TOMORROWS ANGLERS INC
  • Who funds OSHKOSH KIDS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds OSHKOSH UNITED SOCCER CLUB

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oshkosh Area Community Foundation CorporationWI15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oshkosh Area Community Foundation Corporation · Oshkosh Area United Way Inc · J J Keller Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Battle on Bago Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Battle on Bago Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Battle on Bago Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph