Skip to content
Barton Healthcare System at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Barton Healthcare System

Barton Health delivers safe, high quality care and engages the community in the improvement of health and wellness.

$684k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$480k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$3.4MArts & Culture$147kHuman Services$119kEnvironment$114kYouth Development$76kCommunity Improvement$53kHousing & Shelter$52kFood & Nutrition$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $653,479, the rows itemized in this filing. The $683,953 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $30,474 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $61k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $89k
  • $250k+1 grant · $480k
$16,800
Median grant
3
States reached
$366M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Barton Memorial Hospital Foundation$479,729
Tahoe Douglas Visitors Authority$89,000
Keep Memory Alive$27,500
Tahoe Fund$16,800
Keep Memory Alive$16,500
Keep Memory Alive$9,500
El Dorado County Community Helath Center$7,500
Lake Tahoe South Shore Chamber of Commerce$6,950
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $128k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 13% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HUMANGOOD AFFORDABLE HOUSING: $10k → 10%HUMANGOOD AFFORDABLE HOUSING: $7k → 10%Live Violence Free: $10k → 8%LIVE VIOLENCE FREE: $10k → 8%TAHOE COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $10k → 8%Tahoe Coalition For The Homeless: $10k → 8%TAHOE COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $10k → 8%LIVE VIOLENCE FREE: $10k → 8%TAHOE YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $9k → 8%Tahoe Youth & Family Services: $9k → 8%TAHOE YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $8k → 8%LIVE VIOLENCE FREE: $8k → 8%Live Violence Free: $7k → 8%LIVE VIOLENCE FREE: $7k → 8%TAHOE COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8M · 16 repeat orgs$224k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
11

Total granted

$3.8M
$94k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+86%
+88%

Still filing today

63%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $129k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationCrime & LegalEnvironmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BM
    Barton Memorial Hospital Foundation
    8× · 2017–2024 · $3.3M · revenue +7% · 67% of their budget
  • TF
    TAHOE FUND
    6× · 2017–2024 · $114k · revenue +336%
  • VR
    VISTA RISE COLLECTIVE
    6× · 2017–2022 · $51k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • SV
    Squaw Valley Ski Holdings LLC
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • TM
    TAHOE MAGIC INC
    one grant, 2020 · $13k · revenue -34%
  • LT
    Lake Tahoe Unified School Dis
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tahoe Community Foundation

The Foundation envisions a thriving community created through meaningful philanthropy, inclusive communication, and the willingness to explore possibilities together.

Education
2
Clean Tahoe Program

To improve the visual quality of the Tahoe Basin portion of El Dorado County through community education, citizen involvement and enforcecment of litter and nuisance ordinances.

Environment
3
Sierra Watch

Sierra watch secures conservation outcomes to protect the natural resources, mountain communities, and timeless values of the tahoe sierra.

Environment
4
Truckee Trails Foundation Inc

The Truckee Trails Foundation (TTF) is working towards a system of trails and bikeways in and around Truckee, California that will connect people and places, reduce our community's dependence on automobiles, and improve our physical,…

Environment
5
Homeless Resource Council of the Sierras

To lead, collaborate, coordinate, develop, and implement strategies and resources to end homelessness in Nevada and Placer counties.

—
6
Truckee River Watershed Council

The truckee river watershed council was founded to implement locally developed public-private collaborative solutions to protect and improve water quality and biological resources for the sustainable environmental and economic health of…

Environment
7
Carson Valley Health Foundation

None

Health
8
The Center for Violence-Free Relationships

The Center for Violence-Free Relationships is dedicated to building healthy relationships, families, and communities free from sexual assault and domestic violence through education, advocacy, and services in western El Dorado County.

—
9
Eastern Sierra Community Housing

Eastern Sierra Community Housing (ESCH), has spearheaded a workforce housing development program targeted at tackling one of the toughest issues facing Sierra communities today. The private, not-for-profit, organization was established in…

Housing & Shelter
10
High Country Behavioral Health

HCBH provides mental health and substance abuse counseling.

Health
11
Lake Tahoe School

To create a joyful and academically challenging learning environment that echoes the wonder of Lake Tahoe, cultivates community, and sparks personal discovery that leads to an extraordinary future for every student.

Education
12
Tahoe Youth Sports Development
Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is South Lake Tahoe Family Resource Center; the most unlike its peers is Encompass Youth. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
17/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Barton Memorial Hospital Foundation: $3,268,176 · HealthBarton Memorial Hospital Foundation+4 more: $50,255 · HealthTahoe Douglas Visitors Authority: $89,000 · OtherTahoe Dou…KEEP MEMORY ALIVE: $58,100 · OtherKEEP MEMO…PASTOR OF ST THERESA PARISH- SOUTH LAKE TAHOE A CORPORATION SOLE: $30,000 · OtherPASTOR OF…LAKE TAHOE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $25,000 · OtherLAKE TAHO…Boys & Girls Club of Lake Tahoe: $20,600 · OtherBoys & Gi…LAKE TAHOE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $18,000 · OtherA BALANCED LIFE: $15,400 · OtherSquaw Valley Ski Holdings LLC: $15,000 · OtherEL DORADO COUNTY AQMD: $15,000 · OtherEl Dorado Community Foundation: $15,000 · Other+6 more: $48,150 · Other+6 moreVISTA RISE COLLECTIVE: $50,750 · Human ServicesTAHOE COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $35,000 · Human ServicesTahoe Youth and Family Services: $25,750 · Human ServicesHUMANGOOD AFFORDABLE HOUSING: $16,500 · Human ServicesEncompass Youth: $10,000 · Human ServicesTAHOE FUND: $114,200 · EnvironmentSOS OUTREACH: $45,000 · Recreation & SportsSouth Lake Tahoe Family Resource Center: $20,000 · Crime & LegalCASA EL DORADO: $5,000 · Crime & LegalTAHOE MAGIC INC: $12,500 · EducationSierra Business Council: $5,004 · Education
Health$3,318,431Other$349,250Human Services$138,000Environment$114,200Recreation & Sports$45,000Crime & Legal$25,000Education$17,504

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBarton Memorial Hospital Foundation: $3,268,176 over 8y, 67% of budgetTAHOE FUND: $114,200 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetVISTA RISE COLLECTIVE: $50,750 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetSOS OUTREACH: $45,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetTAHOE COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $35,000 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $26,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTahoe Youth and Family Services: $25,750 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Lake Tahoe: $20,600 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSouth Lake Tahoe Family Resource Center: $20,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetHUMANGOOD AFFORDABLE HOUSING: $16,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEl Dorado Community Foundation: $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTAHOE MAGIC INC: $12,500 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetTahoe Prosperity Center: $11,200 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetEncompass Youth: $10,000 over 1y, 95% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NORTHERN SIERRA: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetWashoe Barton Medical Clinic: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEL DORADO COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLake Tahoe South Shore Chamber of Commerce: $6,950 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSierra Business Council: $5,004 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCASA EL DORADO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

El Dorado Community F…Tahoe Community Found…Lake Tahoe Visitors A…Lake Tahoe Kiwanis Cl…Tahoe Truckee Communi…Pipkin Charitable Fou…Sierra Health Foundat…Truettner Family Foun…Sacramento Region Com…Tahoe FundSierra Health Foundat…Silicon Valley Commun…
El Dorado Community FoundationCA32.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: El Dorado Community Foundation · Tahoe Community Foundation · Lake Tahoe Visitors Authority Inc · Lake Tahoe Kiwanis Club Foundation · Tahoe Truckee Community Foundation · Pipkin Charitable Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation · Truettner Family Foundation · Sacramento Region Community Foundation · Tahoe Fund · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · Silicon Valley Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Barton Healthcare System funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Barton Healthcare System. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Barton Healthcare System’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home