Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Barton Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$81k
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$17k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

95% of Barton Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 18 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Barton Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 19 organizations, $81k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

12
17
20
18
20
19
16
20
32
21
20
22
24
23
19
24
18
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$9.6MPhilanthropy$5.6MCrime & Legal$796kCivil Rights$506kEducation$278kEmployment$261kRecreation & Sports$200kArts & Culture$182kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k21 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $27k
$2,500
Median grant
9
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RAVE FOUNDATION$17,263
BLACK BURNER PROJECT$10,000
SEATTLE ART MUSEUM$7,500
SKATE LIKE A GIRL$5,050
SEATTLE POLICE FOUNDATION$5,010
YEARUP$5,000
CASA LATINA$5,000
USC ANNUAL FUND$5,000
THE IF PROJECT$2,500
PAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FOUNDATION$2,500
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$2,500
SURFRIDER FOUNDATION$2,500
EPIPHANY SCHOOL$2,000
SOUND EXPERIENCE$1,030
GLEN LAKE ASSOCIATION$1,030
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOYS & GIRLS AID: $500 → 12%COVENANT HOUSE: $5k → 17%MAX CURE FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%URBAN INITIATIVES: $3k → 14%URBAN INITIATIVES: $3k → 14%URBAN INITIATIVES: $3k → 14%FAMILY LAW CASA: $3k → 9%FAMILY LAW CASA: $3k → 9%FAMILY LAW CASA: $3k → 9%FACING HOMELESSNESS: $100 → 9%FAMILY LAW CASA: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
WA
MT
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
AL
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

11%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 39 repeat orgs$11M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

39 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
61

Total granted

$1.4M
$11M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+7%

Still filing today

85%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $134k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesCrime & LegalInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WS
    WELD SEATTLE
    4× · 2018–2025 · $623k · revenue ×16
  • TI
    THE IF PROJECT
    4× · 2018–2024 · $106k · revenue +3%
  • Williams College
    4× · 2017–2025 · $103k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • MG
    MS GIFT PM BARTON FAMILY FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $5.6M
  • MG
    MS GIFT PM BARTON FAM FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $4.0M
  • AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $200k · revenue +27%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Siff

Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.

Youth Development
2
Seattle Foundation

Seattle foundation's mission is to ignite powerful and rewarding philanthropy to make greater seattle a stronger, more vibrant community for all.

Philanthropy
3
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
4
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
5
Seattle International Foundation

Seattle international foundation (sif) champions equity and rule of law in central america through good governance and a robust civil society. sif works with other donors to the region to increase philanthropy and to promote collaboration,…

Philanthropy
6
Life Science Washington

Life science washington is a non-profit trade and professional association dedicated to promoting innovation and responsible growth in the life sciences and biomedical industries in the state of washington. promotion and education are…

7
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

8
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
9
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

10
Seattle Biomedical Research Institute

We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…

11
Kqed Inc

See schedule okqed serves the people of northern california with a community-supported alternative to commercial media, providing the knowledge needed to make informed decisions; convening community dialogue; bringing the arts to everyone;…

Arts & Culture
12
Fsc I&P

Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Praxis Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Fernwood Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsYouth Development ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyWomen & Girls Leadership De…Community Arts CentersFood Banks and PantriesJewish Community Organizati…Affordable Housing Developm…Public Library OperationsEnvironmental Conservation …Independent K-12 SchoolsLocal History Museums
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%2%<5yr14%8%5–10yr20%22%10–20yr19%25%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%10%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr19%75%20–35yr13%4%35–55yr16%7%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 1.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1.0%1/104
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,656

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

103 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 103 of the 125 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
101/103
Grantees still filing
63/103
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MS GIFT PM BARTON FAMILY FUND — $5,618,222 · OtherMS GIFT PM BARTON FAMILY FUNDMS GIFT PM BARTON FAM FUND — $4,000,000 · OtherMS GIFT PM BARTON FAM FUND+75 more — $714,717 · Other+75 moreMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC — $4,600,000 · PhilanthropyMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDIN…Silicon Valley Community Foundation — $1,000,000 · PhilanthropySilicon Valley Community Foundation+2 more — $7,500 · PhilanthropyWELD SEATTLE — $623,000 · Crime & LegalTHE IF PROJECT — $106,000 · Crime & Legal+3 more — $11,591 · Crime & LegalYEAR UP INC — $165,000 · EducationWilliams College — $102,856 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $100,000 · EducationLAKESIDE SCHOOL — $30,000 · Education+14 more — $39,890 · EducationAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $200,000 · Civil RightsCOLOR OF CHANGEORG EDUCATION FUND — $75,000 · Civil Rights+1 more — $3,605 · Civil RightsFRIENDS OF SEATTLE WATERFRONT — $150,000 · Community ImprovementCENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE — $50,000 · Community ImprovementFRIENDS OF LITTLE SAIGON — $15,450 · Community ImprovementCHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION — $100,000 · HealthTHE PRAXIS PROJECT INC — $50,000 · HealthTHE JOSSELYN CENTER NFP — $11,588 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $6,500 · Health+11 more — $14,693 · Health
Other$10,332,939Philanthropy$5,607,500Crime & Legal$740,591Education$437,746Civil Rights$278,605Community Improvement$215,450Health$182,781

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC — $4,600,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation — $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWELD SEATTLE — $623,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $200,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYEAR UP INC — $165,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF SEATTLE WATERFRONT — $150,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE IF PROJECT — $106,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetWilliams College — $102,856 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUMMER SEARCH — $81,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC — $75,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOLOR OF CHANGEORG EDUCATION FUND — $75,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE PRAXIS PROJECT INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMEELIO INC — $50,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetSEATTLE ART MUSEUM — $41,725 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLAKESIDE SCHOOL — $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRave Foundation — $22,263 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $12,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JOSSELYN CENTER NFP — $11,588 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY LAW CASA OF KING COUNTY — $10,289 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMON SENSE MEDIA — $10,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLACK BURNER PROJECT CO — $10,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetBrothers for Life — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLEN LAKE ASSOCIATION INC — $9,590 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetSCHOOL YEAR ABROAD INC — $9,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetEPIPHANY SCHOOL — $8,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HENRY GALLERY ASSOCIATION INC — $8,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSeattle Police Foundation — $7,510 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetURBAN INITIATIVES INC — $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFARESTART — $6,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $6,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGlobal Impact — $6,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM — $5,757 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCODEORG — $5,313 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST FILM FORUM — $5,150 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSKATE LIKE A GIRL — $5,050 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEL DORADO FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetBREAKING BOUNDARIES FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE NATIVITY SCHOOL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MAX CURE FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE WASHINGTON STEM CENTER — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCASA LATINA — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA43.2× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Wyman Youth Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Grousemont Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Glassybaby White Light Fund · United Way of King County · Artsfund · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Vitalogy Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Barton Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
  • The Boys & Girls Aid Society of Oregon3% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc0% of income from government
  • Williams College0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
26report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Barton Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Barton Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 125 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph