Skip to content

· Private foundation

Barstahl Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$168k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Religion$488kInternational$174kCommunity Improvement$73kHuman Services$55kCivil Rights$54kHousing & Shelter$47kSocial Science$34k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $150k
$20,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARIAN FATHERS OF THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION OF THE$20,000
SAMARITANS PURSE$20,000
ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC$20,000
OPEN DOORS INTERNATIONAL USA INC$20,000
BECKET FUND$20,000
ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM$20,000
GC RELIEF$20,000
KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES INC$10,000
MARY THEOTOKOS CENTER INC$9,000
MADONNA HOUSE$9,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COVENANT HOUSE: $18k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MT
MI
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
VA
MD
AZ
NM
NC
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 25% of Barstahl Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Barstahl Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 28% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$818k · 14 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
5

Total granted

$818k
$63k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+34%

Still filing today

57%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesSocial ScienceOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $117k · revenue +151%
  • EW
    ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $111k · revenue +75%
  • OD
    Open Doors With Brother Andrew Inc
    6× · 2019–2024 · $103k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • PP
    PERSECUTION PROJECT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +12%
  • CH
    COVENANT HOUSEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $18k · revenue +34%
  • CF
    CHRISTIAN FREEDOM INTERNATIONAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +71%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fsi-Freedom Seekers International

Freedom seekers international is a christian organization that exists to rescue the most severely persecuted for their religious faith in hostile and restrictive countries. through collaborative partnerships we deliver those who are…

Human Services
2
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
3
Barnabas Aid International

An organization supporting christians where they suffer persecution and/or discrimination as a consequence of their faith.

International
4
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
5
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry Inc

To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.

—
6
International Catholic Jurists Forum Inc

The International Catholic Jurists Forum (ICJF) was established to produce, compile, and share resources on fundamental human rights under attack in the regional and international human rights protection systems. It operates as a forum for…

Religion
7
Global Faith Network
Human Services
8
International Christian Publishers

Religious corp, charitable, educational and cultural, conduct all activities relate to publishingchristian literature

Religion
9
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
10
Angel Christian Television Trust Inc

Our mission is to go into all the world and preach the Gospel through all forms of media and broadcast. We are a Christian organization spreading the word of God to the ends of the earth.

Religion
11
Living His Life Abundantly International

To inform, instruct and inspire people through the media about the sacred scriptures and teachings of the roman catholic church

Religion
12
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Open Doors International Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Covenant House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $116,550 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSEETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC: $110,517 · ReligionETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INCOpen Doors With Brother Andrew Inc: $103,000 · ReligionOpen Doors With Brother Andrew IncBARNABAS FUND INC: $54,050 · ReligionBARNABAS FUND INCInternational Christian Concern Inc: $42,500 · ReligionInternational Christian Concern IncOPEN DOORS INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $26,000 · ReligionOPEN DOORS INTERNATIONAL USA INCPERSECUTION PROJECT FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Religion+1 more: $12,000 · ReligionMADONNA HOUSE: $91,917 · OtherMADONNA HOUSEMARIAN FATHERS OF THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION OF THE BVM: $46,000 · OtherMARIAN FATHERS OF THE IMMACULA…AID TO THE CHURCH IN NEED INC: $34,500 · OtherAID TO THE CHURCH IN NEED INCCATHOLIC NEAR EAST WELFARE ASSOC INC: $34,500 · OtherCATHOLIC NEAR EAST WELFARE ASS…MARY THEOTOKOS CENTER INC: $28,550 · OtherMARY THEOTOKOS CENTER INCKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES INC: $10,000 · Other+1 more: $713 · OtherKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES INC: $73,000 · Community ImprovementALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $53,517 · Civil RightsCHRISTIAN FREEDOM INTERNATIONAL INC: $14,500 · Civil RightsThe Becket Fund: $33,517 · Social ScienceCOVENANT HOUSE: $18,000 · Human Services
Religion$484,617Other$246,180Community Improvement$73,000Civil Rights$68,017Social Science$33,517Human Services$18,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $116,550 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC: $110,517 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOpen Doors With Brother Andrew Inc: $103,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES INC: $73,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBARNABAS FUND INC: $54,050 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $53,517 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Christian Concern Inc: $42,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetThe Becket Fund: $33,517 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOPEN DOORS INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $26,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPERSECUTION PROJECT FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN FREEDOM INTERNATIONAL INC: $14,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetAvila Foundation Inc: $12,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds Open Doors With Brother Andrew Inc ↗
  • Who funds KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds BARNABAS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds International Christian Concern Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Becket Fund ↗
  • Who funds OPEN DOORS INTERNATIONAL USA INC ↗
  • Who funds PERSECUTION PROJECT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN FREEDOM INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Avila Foundation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS12.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Barstahl Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Barstahl Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Barstahl’s filings →

    More from the funding graph