· Private foundation
Barsanti Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $9k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $23k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YERKES FUTURE FOUNDATION | $13,090 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| BARRINGTON AREA COUNCIL ON AGING | $5,322 |
| BARRINGTON 220 EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| BARRINGTON HIGH SCHOOL | $650 |
| Individual grant recipient | $547 |
| CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK HOSPITALS | $535 |
| SAN FILLIPO FOUNDATION | $300 |
| GENEVA LAKE CONSERVANCY | $250 |
| GENEVA LAKE MUSEUM | $250 |
| HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION | $250 |
| PONTCHARTRAIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL | $250 |
| USS CONSTITUTION MUSEUM | $100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +2401% since the first grant, against +56% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YFYERKES FUTURE FOUNDATION INC2× · 2019–2024 · $38k · revenue ×25
- IGIndividual grant recipient2× · 2019–2024 · $11k
- BABARRINGTON AREA COUNCIL ON AGING INC2× · 2019–2024 · $7k · revenue +80%
Funded once
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITYone grant, 2019 · $25k
- BYBARRINGTON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICESgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +187%
LAKE GENEVA FRESH AIR ASSOCIATION INCone grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +18%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The lincoln children's museum invites children to create, discover and learn through the power of play.
Children's services
Operation of a nautical history museum.
Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.
To preserve the open land, rural character and the scenic, historic, recreational, and ecological significant resources within the surrounding communities of barrington, il.
Our mission is to make science, technology, engineering, and math (stem) come alive, and our vision is a community where all people value stem to inform decision making and enrich lives. (continued on schedule o)guiding principles: we help…
The new england air museum's mission is to preserve and present the story of aviation and aerospace, with an emphasis on new england's role, and the genius and inspiration that made it possible. the museum also seeks to inspire young…
Dedicated to permanently preserve the natural, scenic and recreational resources of the Lake George Basin.
To promote the health, social, educational, vocational and character development for boys and girls
Port discovery children's museum's mission is to connect purposeful play and learning within its walls and beyond.
The museum is an educational corporation formed to ignite a life-long passion for exploring, discovering, and valuing nature and science.
The organization provides child care services to families through child care centers and a network of family child care homes. child care of the berkshires also strengthens families through support services and home visiting focused on…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lake Geneva Fresh Air Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is Huntsman Cancer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YERKES FUTURE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BARRINGTON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds BARRINGTON AREA COUNCIL ON AGING INC ↗
- Who funds LAKE GENEVA FRESH AIR ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE DUNDEE TOWNSHIP ↗
- Who funds PLACE OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds BARRINGTON 220 EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GENEVA LAKE CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds GENEVA LAKE MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds USS CONSTITUTION MUSEUM INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Otzen Family Foundation Incorporated · The John a Miller Family Foundation · A G Cox Charity Trust Xxxxx9001 · The Anna Emery Hanson Charitable Foundation 1 · Dean L & Rosemarie Buntrock Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Barsanti Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Uss Constitution Museum Inc — 17% of income from government
- Place of Hope Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.