Skip to content

· Private foundation

Barry K Schwartz Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$760k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$1.3MHealth$787kEducation$646kReligion$549kRecreation & Sports$521kArts & Culture$393kEmployment$93kAnimals$69kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $150k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $560k
$5,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$300k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH$200,000
SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES$200,000
CENTRAL SYNAGOGUE$160,360
ELI SUNSHINE FUND$25,000
FRIENDS OF THE DANIEL CENTERS FOR PROGRESSIVE JUDAISM$25,000
FASHION INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION$22,500
GRAYSON-JOCKEY CLUB FOUNDATION$20,000
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION$17,500
BACKSTRETCH EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE TEAM$15,000
UCLA FOUNDATION$15,000
92ND STREET Y$10,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$5,000
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$5,000
CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS$5,000
CHABAD TORAH CENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GOOD DOG FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 14%BELMONT CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION: $1k → 6%BELMONT CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION: $1k → 6%BELMONT CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION: $1k → 6%BELMONT CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION: $1k → 6%HIP HOP PUBLIC HEALTH: $1k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $5k → 17%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
NY
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
KY
MD
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.4M · 46 repeat orgs$358k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

46 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
53

Total granted

$4.4M
$277k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+16%

Still filing today

54%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $81k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureAnimalsPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +48%
  • NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH
    6× · 2017–2025 · $631k · revenue +50%
  • THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $159k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • NJ
    NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
  • EM
    ELI MORISON SUNSHINE FUND GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • DC
    DANIEL CENTERS FOR PROGRESSIVE JUDAISM
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
4
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
10
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lighthouse International; the most unlike its peers is Brain Injury Rights Group Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 115 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
63/65
Grantees still filing
37/65
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTRAL SYNAGOGUE: $923,640 · OtherCENTRAL SYNAGOGUEDOUBLE H-HOLE IN THE WOODS: $408,000 · OtherDOUBLE H-HOLE IN THE WOODSFASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION: $102,500 · OtherGRAYSON-JOCKEY CLUB FOUNDATION: $102,000 · OtherNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $100,000 · Other+79 more: $660,591 · Other+79 moreSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC: $1,521,730 · Human ServicesSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC+6 more: $19,075 · Human ServicesNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $630,500 · HealthNATIONAL JEWIS…+10 more: $52,370 · Health+10 moreBROWN UNIVERSITY: $437,500 · Community ImprovementBROWN UNI…UCLA FOUNDATION: $90,000 · EducationAUBURN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $45,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $30,000 · Education+4 more: $4,350 · EducationTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $158,500 · Public Safety & Disaster+1 more: $1,500 · Public Safety & DisasterAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $50,000 · Civil RightsTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $5,000 · Civil Rights+1 more: $1,000 · Civil Rights
Other$2,296,731Human Services$1,540,805Health$682,870Community Improvement$437,500Education$169,350Public Safety & Disaster$160,000Civil Rights$56,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC: $1,521,730 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $630,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $437,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $158,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION: $102,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $90,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAUBURN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $45,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MUSEUM OF RACING INC: $26,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBACKSTRETCH EMPLOYEE SERVICE TEAM OF NEW YORK INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE DANIEL CENTERS FOR PROGRESSIVE JUDAISM: $25,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetChabad Torah Center: $20,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetCHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC: $18,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGUIDANCE CENTER OF WESTCHESTER INC: $17,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE IRISH REPERTORY THEATRE COMPANYINC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSanta Barbara Cottage Hospital: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ELLEN FUND: $15,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $11,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPERMANENTLY DISABLED JOCKEYS FUND INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL MUSEUM OF DANCE: $10,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR STEPS INC: $5,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetTHE GUIDANCE CENTER: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JOCKEY CLUB SAFETY NET FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GIFT OF LIFE CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetBelmont Child Care Association Inc: $4,075 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe Hospital for Special Surgery Fund Inc: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR FURTHERANCE OF JEWISH EDUCATION AND AFFILLIATES: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChristian Herald Association Inc: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetACCESS SUPPORTS FOR LIVING FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $2,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOMERS LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $2,100 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetThe Bowery Mission Foundation: $2,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetXAVIER MISSION INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Hebrew Home for Aged at Riverdale: $1,620 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetRACE FUND INC: $1,525 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetSomers Volunteer Fire Departmen Inc: $1,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds AUBURN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MUSEUM OF RACING INC ↗
  • Who funds BACKSTRETCH EMPLOYEE SERVICE TEAM OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE DANIEL CENTERS FOR PROGRESSIVE JUDAISM ↗
  • Who funds Chabad Torah Center ↗
  • Who funds CHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds GUIDANCE CENTER OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE IRISH REPERTORY THEATRE COMPANYINC ↗
  • Who funds Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital ↗
  • Who funds THE ELLEN FUND ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds PERMANENTLY DISABLED JOCKEYS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MUSEUM OF DANCE ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Brian Ratner FoundationOH15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Brian Ratner Foundation · Nafzger Family Foundation · Thoroughbred Charities of America Inc · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Barry K Schwartz Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Barry K Schwartz Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 115 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Barry K Schwartz Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph