Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bard Robert L & Agnes Cook Bard-Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$164k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$249kHousing & Shelter$142kFood & Nutrition$114kHuman Services$114kEducation$107kReligion$65kCrime & Legal$46kEnvironment$44kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $71k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $93k
$9,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMPHILL VILLAGE KIMBERTON HILLS$12,000
ROYERSFORD FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY$11,000
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA MUSEUM$10,000
PROJECT OUTREACH$10,000
MEALS ON WHEELS OF CHESTER COUNTY$10,000
OPEN HEARTH INC$10,000
SPRINGFORD AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY$10,000
PHOENIXVILLE AREA SENIOR CENTER$10,000
ORION COMMUNITIES$10,000
BRUSH WITH THE LAW$9,000
CITIZEN ADVOCACY OF CHESTER COUNTY$9,000
COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL$9,000
TRELLIS FOR TOMORROW$8,000
MUSICOPIA$8,000
SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $136k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%OPEN HEARTH INC: $10k → 6%OPEN HEARTH INC: $10k → 6%OPEN HEARTH INC: $6k → 6%OPEN HEARTH INC: $5k → 6%MEALS ON WHEELS OF CHESTER COUNTY: $10k → 6%MEALS ON WHEELS OF CHESTER COUNTY: $8k → 6%MEALS ON WHEELS OF CHESTER COUNTY: $6k → 6%PROJECT OUTREACH: $12k → 7%MEALS ON WHEELS OF CHESTER COUNTY: $4k → 6%MEALS ON WHEELS OF CHESTER COUNTY: $4k → 6%MEALS ON WHEELS OF CHESTER COUNTY: $3k → 6%MEALS ON WHEELS OF CHESTER COUNTY: $3k → 6%PROJECT OUTREACH: $10k → 7%PROJECT OUTREACH: $10k → 7%OPEN HEARTH INC: $10k → 6%OPEN HEARTH INC: $10k → 6%OPEN HEARTH INC: $9k → 6%PROJECT OUTREACH: $7k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$968k · 25 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
2

Total granted

$968k
$13k

Still filing today

68%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyEducationFood & NutritionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OC
    ORION COMMUNITIES INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $82k · revenue +43%
  • RF
    ROYERSFORD FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $69k · revenue +20%
  • OH
    OPEN HEARTH INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $60k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $12k
  • DA
    DAIKON ADULT DAY SERVICES
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Penn Hills Library

A welcoming community center that provides information and equitable access to space, collections, materials, programs and services that enrich the quality of life and facilitate lifelong learning.

Education
2
SpArc Services

To provide day programming services that will assist people to learn skills in order to live independently.

Employment
3
Springwell Inc

Springwell helps individuals improve their quality of life and reduce their need for residential care by helping them access community resources. springwell works with individuals directly as well as with government agencies, health…

Human Services
4
Sewickley Public Library

The mission of the Sewickley Public Library is to provide lifelong learning oppurtunities to the children and adults of the greater Quaker Valley Community.

Education
5
Montgomery County - Norristown Public Library

Montgomery county norristown public library, a gateway to lifelong learning, provides convenient access to resources that inform, educate, entertain, and enrich people's lives.

Education
6
Meals on Wheels of Mercer County Inc

To assist participants in Mercer County, NJ in maintaining independence, dignity, health & well-being by providing comprehensive nutrition services and helping ease social isolation.

—
7
Cambria Library Association

Public library services

—
8
Washington County Free Library

The mission of the washington county free library system is to continually improve our service to the public by:* providing the public with free access to library materials in a variety of formats* promoting community enrichment, economic…

Education
9
Philadelphia Chinatown Development Corporation

The corporation's mission includes, but is not limited to, combatingcommunity deterioration within chinatown; preserving and developingthe chinatown community; leading the community in neighborhoodplanning, considering land use, and…

Community Improvement
10
Selbyville Public Library

The Selbyville Public Library provides free access to information and library materials to residents and visitors to Sussex County in the State of Delaware.

—
11
Carbondale Public Library

Public lending library

—
12
Pike County Public Library Inc

Provides free library services to residents of pike county, pennsylvania

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Orion Communities Inc; the most unlike its peers is Camphill Village Kimberton Hills Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ORION COMMUNITIES INC: $82,000 · OtherORION COMMUNITIES INCSPRING-FORD AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $70,993 · OtherSPRING-FORD AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETYOPEN DOOR MINISTRY: $65,000 · OtherOPEN DOOR MINISTRYUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA MUSEUM: $48,931 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA MUSEUMCITIZEN ADVOCACY OF CHESTER COUNTY: $46,000 · OtherCITIZEN ADVOCACY OF CHESTER COUNTYSAINT VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY: $42,500 · OtherSAINT VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETYSenior Adult Activity Center of the Phoenixville Area: $42,500 · OtherSenior Adult Activity Center of the Phoenixville AreaSPRING CITY FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $34,000 · OtherSPRING CITY FREE PUBLIC LIBRARYBRUSH WITH THE LAW: $23,000 · OtherRSVP Volunteers: $23,000 · Other+5 more: $62,325 · Other+5 moreOPEN HEARTH INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesOPEN HEARTH INCPROJECT OUTREACH: $39,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT OUTREACHMEALS ON WHEELS OF CHESTER COUNTY: $37,000 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEELS …AMERICA RESPONDS WITH LOVE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesAMERICA RESPONDS…COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL OF COLLEGEVILLE LTD: $48,200 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY …MUSICOPIA INC: $40,000 · Arts & CultureMUSICOPIA …ROYERSFORD FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $68,774 · EducationCAMPHILL VILLAGE KIMBERTON HILLS INC: $43,500 · Food & NutritionTRELLIS FOR TOMORROW: $38,000 · PhilanthropySPRING-FORD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $4,500 · PhilanthropyNORRISTOWN ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $29,000 · AnimalsHEALTH CARE ACCESS: $23,000 · Health
Other$540,249Human Services$146,000Arts & Culture$88,200Education$68,774Food & Nutrition$43,500Philanthropy$42,500Animals$29,000Health$23,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetORION COMMUNITIES INC: $82,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetROYERSFORD FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $68,774 over 7y, 14% of budgetOPEN HEARTH INC: $60,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL OF COLLEGEVILLE LTD: $48,200 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetCITIZEN ADVOCACY OF CHESTER COUNTY: $46,000 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetCAMPHILL VILLAGE KIMBERTON HILLS INC: $43,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSenior Adult Activity Center of the Phoenixville Area: $42,500 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetMUSICOPIA INC: $40,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetPROJECT OUTREACH: $39,000 over 4y, 8.3% of budgetTRELLIS FOR TOMORROW: $38,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF CHESTER COUNTY: $37,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetSPRING CITY FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $34,000 over 6y, 4.8% of budgetNORRISTOWN ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $29,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetRSVP Volunteers: $23,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetHEALTH CARE ACCESS: $23,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICA RESPONDS WITH LOVE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 98% of budgetSPRING-FORD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 3y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ORION COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ROYERSFORD FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds OPEN HEARTH INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL OF COLLEGEVILLE LTD ↗
  • Who funds CITIZEN ADVOCACY OF CHESTER COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds CAMPHILL VILLAGE KIMBERTON HILLS INC ↗
  • Who funds Senior Adult Activity Center of the Phoenixville Area ↗
  • Who funds MUSICOPIA INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds TRELLIS FOR TOMORROW ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF CHESTER COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds SPRING CITY FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds NORRISTOWN ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds RSVP Volunteers ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH CARE ACCESS ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA RESPONDS WITH LOVE INC ↗
  • Who funds SPRING-FORD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia FoundationPA22.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · Chester County Community Foundation · The Gordon Charter Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Genuardi Family Foundation · Hankin Foundation · W W Smith Charitable Trust · Connelly Foundation · The Smith Foundation Aka the Hoxie Harrison Smith Foundation · The Arcadia Foundation · United Way of Chester County Inc · Pottstown Regional Community Foundation Fka Pottstown Area Health and Wellness

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bard Robert L & Agnes Cook Bard-Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bard Robert L & Agnes Cook Bard-Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bard Robert L & Agnes Cook Bard-Tr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph