Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Barbara & Alvin Doppelt Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Philanthropy$1.1MHuman Services$46kInternational$29kEducation$22kReligion$15kFood & Nutrition$4kHealth$4kEmployment$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$725k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM$25,000
MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $49k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NEW FLORIDA FOLLIES: $10 → 15%MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%NAPLES TAKE A SOLDIER FISHING: $1k → 10%ASPIRITECH: $3k → 8%MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%SHALVA: $200 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

7%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$85k · 4 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +252% since the first grant, against +50% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
16

Total granted

$85k
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+252%
+50%

Still filing today

75%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’24
Human ServicesFood & NutritionInternationalCommunity ImprovementHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2024 · $45k · revenue +286%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    2× · 2019–2024 · $29k · revenue +252%
  • PA
    PROJECT ANGEL HEART
    2× · 2019–2020 · $2k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • FC
    FIDELITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $1.1M
  • CL
    CHEDER LUBAVITCH HEBREW DAY SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • NS
    NORTH SUBURBAN BETH EL
    one grant, 2020 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Federation of Sarasota-Manatee Inc

To strengthen jewish life and identity in our community, provide for jewish people in need and promote support for israel.

Philanthropy
2
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
3
Jewish Federation of Southern New Jersey

The jewish federation of southern new jersey cares for those in need, enhances jewish life and ensures the continuity of a vibrant jewish community locally, in israel and around the world.

Philanthropy
4
The Jewish Pavilion of Central Florida Inc

The jewish connection for elder-care residents. enhancing lives in senior-living communities through friendly visits, holiday celebrations and engaging programs. bringing smiles to residents of all faiths.

Human Services
5
Jewish Family Service of Los Angeles

Jfsla's mission is to provide life-improving services that help the people of los angeles live with dignity and exercise self-determination. we believe in and strive for a more compassionate los angeles where no one has to navigate life…

Human Services
6
Chelsea Jewish Nursing Home Inc

The organization's mission is to provide individuals throughout the greater boston area with the highest level of skilled nursing, rehabilitation and assisted living services without regard to ability to pay. the goal is to ensure both…

Health
7
Jewish Family Home Care Inc

Jewish family home care, inc. is dedicated to empowering individuals, strengthening older adults and families, and protecting the vulnerable by providing exceptional home care and nursing assessments services guided by jewish values,…

Health
8
Chelsea Jewish North Shore Assisted Living Inc

To enrich the life of each of our residents and program participants so that each may continue to live his or her life with a sense of meaning and purpose. we provide assisted living units for our tenants.

Housing & Shelter
9
Chabad Food Fund Inc

The nbsp;chabad nbsp;food nbsp;fund nbsp;inc nbsp;provides nbsp;healthy nbsp;adequate nbsp;and nbsp;consistent nbsp;kosher nbsp;food nbsp;supply nbsp;for nbsp;jewish nbsp;families nbsp;and nbsp;individuals nbsp;in nbsp;need nbsp;within…

Religion
10
Jewish Federation of Detroit

The jewish federation of detroit is the cornerstone of our jewish community. we are committed to taking care of the needs of the jewish people and building a strong and vibrant jewish future, in detroit, in israel and around the world.

Philanthropy
11
Jewish Adoption and Foster Care Options Inc

The organization's mission is to care for abused, neglected and at-risk children as well as those with developmental disabilities in the jewish community and to work in partnership with families and the entire community.

Human Services
12
American Friends of Migdal Ohr

Migdal Ohr means "tower of light" in Hebrew and serves as a beacon of hope to thousands of orphaned and neglected children. We serve over 10,000 children every year and raise them to become thriving, successful adults. Migdal Ohr gives…

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Magen David Adom and the most unlike its peers is National Jewish Health. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIDELITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $1,121,221 · OtherFIDELITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION+9 more — $39,579 · OtherMISERICORDIA FOUNDATION — $45,000 · Human ServicesASPIRITECH NFP — $3,000 · Human Services+3 more — $1,210 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $29,000 · InternationalHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC — $3,000 · Food & NutritionOUR DAILY BREAD FOOD PANTRY INCORPORATED — $1,000 · Food & NutritionNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH — $3,000 · HealthPROJECT ANGEL HEART — $2,000 · Community Improvement
Other$1,160,800Human Services$49,210International$29,000Food & Nutrition$4,000Health$3,000Community Improvement$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMISERICORDIA FOUNDATION — $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $29,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASPIRITECH NFP — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT ANGEL HEART — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetORT AMERICA INC — $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR DAILY BREAD FOOD PANTRY INCORPORATED — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAPLES TAKE A SOLDIER FISHING INC — $1,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSHALVA INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEW FLORIDA FOLLIES INC — $10 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH10.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Barbara & Alvin Doppelt Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Barbara & Alvin Doppelt Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Barbara & Alvin Doppelt Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph