Skip to content
Bailey-Stanford Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Bailey-Stanford Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$154k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$154k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$784kArts & Culture$121kPhilanthropy$29kHealth$9kRecreation & Sports$7kEnvironment$5kYouth Development$4kInternational$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$153,850
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Schedule 2$153,850
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 85% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Herbalife Family Foundation: $19k → 14%Huntsman Cancer Center Clinic: $3k → 8%Bailey Hundo: $5k → 3%Boy Scouts of America: $3k → 7%Adams CampCO Institute of Developm: $2k → 8%Johnson Depression Center: $5k → 10%Nature Conservancy: $3k → 12%Denver Urban Scholars: $2k → 12%Habitat for Humanity: $500 → 18%Herbalife Family Foundation: $10k → 14%Rape Recovery Center: $500 → 8%Bailey Hundo: $5k → 3%Schedule 4: $112k → 7%Adams CampCO Institute of Developm: $1k → 8%Nature Conservancy: $2k → 12%Coors Art: $5k → 12%Habitat for Humanity: $400 → 18%Mizel Museum: $4k → 7%Coor Art: $5k → 12%IU Dance Marathon: $600 → 18%Mizel Museum: $3k → 7%Roundup Riders of the Rockies Herit: $5k → 12%IU Dance Marathon: $500 → 18%Schedule 2: $169k → 12%National Jewish Health: $2k → 12%Roundup Riders of the Rockies Herit: $2k → 12%Schedule 2: $154k → 12%Denver Scholarship Foundation: $3k → 12%Schedule 2: $143k → 12%Schedule 3: $128k → 12%Schedule 4: $124k → 12%Alliance for Choice in Education: $30k → 12%Spaulding Leadership Institute: $2k → 12%Alliance for Choice in Education: $30k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$818k · 10 repeat orgs$163k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +194% since the first grant, against +110% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
13

Total granted

$818k
$163k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+194%
+110%

Still filing today

20%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthPhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • S2
    Schedule 2
    3× · 2022–2024 · $465k
  • S4
    Schedule 4
    2× · 2019–2021 · $236k
  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $60k · revenue +194%

Funded once

  • S3
    Schedule 3
    one grant, 2020 · $128k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • JD
    Johnson Depression Center
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Education Forward Arizona

To advocate for and act on education improvements that advance the quality of life for all arizonans.

—
2
International Youth Foundation

Iyf is a global ngo that prepares young people to be healthy, productive and engaged citizens.

International
3
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
4
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
5
Tennessee State Collaborative On Reforming Education

The mission of the state collaborative on reforming education (score) is to catalyze transformative change in tennessee education so that all students can achieve success. score is an independent, nonprofit, and nonpartisan institution,…

Education
6
Colorado Dream Foundation

We partner with youth and their families as they successfully navigate school, college, and career by providing a holistic academic, social, and emotional program from elementary school through college, along with post-secondary…

—
7
The Girls Athletic Leadership School of Denver

The Girls Athletic Leadership School, Denver (GALS) is the only public, all-girls charter school in the State of Colorado. GALS' mission is to empower young women to succeed academically, lead confidently, live boldly, and thrive…

Education
8
Jobs for Americas Graduates Nm Inc

Jobs for Americas Graduates - NM JAG-NM transforms communities, one student at a time, by re-engaging academically vulnerable high school students and preparing them to reach their potential through graduation and beyond.

—
9
Live the Solution Dba Earn to Learn

Earn to learn's mission is "empowering students to achieve their goals and be workforce ready with little to no student debt".

Human Services
10
Knowledgeworks Foundation

We help our partners in states and schools work together to align policy and practice, reimagining what education can do through personalized, competency-based learning - and what it must do to prepare students for a lifetime of learning.

Education
11
Strategic Education Research Partnership Institute

The strategic education research partnership generates innovative, scalable solutions to our schools' most pressing problems through sustained collaborations among researchers, practitioners, and designers. we work to increase equity,…

Science & Tech
12
Collaborative for Academic Social and Emotional Learning

Casel is a trusted source for knowledge about high-quality, evidence-based social and emotional learning (sel). our mission is to help make evidence-based social and emotional learning (sel) an integral part of education from preschool to…

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alliance for Choice in Education; the most unlike its peers is National Jewish Health. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Schedule 2: $465,244 · OtherSchedule 2Schedule 4: $235,785 · OtherSchedule 4Schedule 3: $128,437 · OtherSchedule 3+14 more: $59,000 · Other+14 moreALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $60,000 · EducationDENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $2,800 · Education+1 more: $2,000 · EducationHERBALIFE FAMILY FOUNDATION: $28,500 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $1,700 · HealthRAPE RECOVERY CENTER: $500 · HealthLOVE146 INC: $2,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$888,466Education$64,800Philanthropy$28,500Health$2,200Crime & Legal$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHERBALIFE FAMILY FOUNDATION: $28,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $2,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTommy Spaulding Leadership Institute: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLOVE146 INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDENVER URBAN SCHOLARS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $1,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAPE RECOVERY CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds HERBALIFE FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds DENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Tommy Spaulding Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds LOVE146 INC ↗
  • Who funds DENVER URBAN SCHOLARS ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds RAPE RECOVERY CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bailey-Stanford Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bailey-Stanford Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 49%
  • LOVE146 Inc: 49% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Bailey-Stanford Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Bailey-Stanford Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bailey-Stanford Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home