Skip to content

· Private foundation

Baer Family Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$199k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$143k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$315kFood & Nutrition$145kArts & Culture$94kRecreation & Sports$47kReligion$23kEducation$19kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kInternational$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $6k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $193k
$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$300k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROCK RIVER THRESHEREE INC$142,801
MAYO CLINIC$50,000
ST ANTHONY'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$3,000
KART 4 KIDS$2,000
SCHOOL COMMUNITY INPACT GROUP$500
MANITO ART LEAGUE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%KELLER FAMILY COMMUNITY FUND: $1k → 11%LYMELIGHT FOUNDATION: $1k → 7%APTIV FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%KELLER FAMILY COMMUNITY FUND: $1k → 11%SCHOOL COMMUNITY INPACT GROUP: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$167k · 15 repeat orgs$196k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against -16% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
12

Total granted

$167k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
-16%

Still filing today

47%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 4% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $143k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureRecreation & SportsInternationalEnvironmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RE
    RUTH ECKERD HALL INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $38k · revenue +46%
  • NL
    NORTH LAKELAND DISCOVERY CENTER INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $26k · revenue +100%
  • CJ
    CAMP JORN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC
    5× · 2018–2023 · $18k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • MW
    MANITOWISH WATERS FIRE CO
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • MW
    MANITOWISH WATERS BIKE TRAIL INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -16%
  • FE
    FUNDACION ESPERANZA
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mayo Clinic Group Return

To inspire hope and contribute to health and well-being by providing the best care to every patient through integrated clinical practice, education, and research.

Health
2
Adirondack Ski Touring Council Inc

To maintain over 100 miles of cross country ski and mountain bike trails in the vicinity of lake placid, new york.

Youth Development
3
The Mark O'connell Foundation for Lake Winnipesaukee Safety
Environment
4
Wisconsin State Golf Association Inc

The wisconsin state golf association was formed and exists for the general purpose of promoting and conserving, throughout the state of wisconsin, the best interests and the true spirit of the game of golf. included within the general…

—
5
MadHatter Cycling
Recreation & Sports
6
Whitewater Valley Railroad Association Inc

The whitewater valley railroad is a heritage railroad dedicated to the preservation and presentation of branch line railroading.

Arts & Culture
7
Friends of the Fred Meijer River Valley Rail-Trails

To foster and facilitate the conversion of greenways and railroad rights- of-way in the counties of ionia, kent, and montcalm to non-mototized trails for the use of the general public.

Philanthropy
8
Wmc Litigation Center Inc

The wmc litigation center's mission is to represent clients in legal actions to foster and protect the free enterprise system.

Education
9
Removing the Barriers Initiative Inc

Removing the barriers initiative was founded in 2011 for the purpose of removing barriers to great expeniences for people and families with disabilities, differences and special needs. we started by assisting camps who served campers with…

Human Services
10
The Mendota Gridiron Club Inc

Raise funds to aid the division of intercollegiate athletics of the university of wisconsin - madison in furthering its football program.

—
11
Minnesota Quarter Midget Race Asso

To provide a platform for youth racing

—
12
Bicycle Rides Northwest

Cycling

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Scholl Community Impact Group Inc; the most unlike its peers is Project for the People of Paraguay. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAYO CLINIC: $300,000 · HealthMAYO CLINIC+1 more: $9,500 · HealthROCK RIVER THRESHEREE ASSOCIATION: $142,801 · OtherROCK RIVER THRESHEREE ASSOCIATIONMANITOWISH WATERS HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $25,759 · OtherMANITOWISH WATERS HISTORICAL SOCIETYNORTH LAKELAND SCHOOL DISTRICT: $13,500 · OtherNORTH LAKELAND SCHOOL DISTRICTMANITOWISH WATERS FIRE CO: $10,000 · OtherFUNDACION ESPERANZA: $10,000 · OtherWINMAN TRAILS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Other+12 more: $32,714 · Other+12 moreRUTH ECKERD HALL INC: $38,400 · Arts & CultureRUTH ECKERD…NORTH LAKELAND DISCOVERY CENTER INC: $26,355 · Arts & CultureNORTH LAKEL…CAMP JORN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $17,750 · Recreation & SportsMANITOWISH WATERS BIKE TRAIL INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsAPTIV FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesKELLER FAMILY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Human ServicesLymeLight Foundation: $1,000 · Human ServicesSCHOLL COMMUNITY IMPACT GROUP INC: $500 · Human ServicesPROJECT FOR THE PEOPLE OF PARAGUAY: $7,304 · InternationalMANITOWISH WATERS LAKES ASSOCIATION INC: $400 · Environment
Health$309,500Other$244,774Arts & Culture$64,755Recreation & Sports$27,750Human Services$8,500International$7,304Environment$400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAYO CLINIC: $300,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetROCK RIVER THRESHEREE ASSOCIATION: $142,801 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetRUTH ECKERD HALL INC: $38,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH LAKELAND DISCOVERY CENTER INC: $26,355 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetCAMP JORN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $17,750 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMANITOWISH WATERS BIKE TRAIL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetKART 4 KIDS INC: $9,500 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetPROJECT FOR THE PEOPLE OF PARAGUAY: $7,304 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetAPTIV FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKELLER FAMILY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetLymeLight Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSCHOLL COMMUNITY IMPACT GROUP INC: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMANITOWISH WATERS LAKES ASSOCIATION INC: $400 over 4y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds ROCK RIVER THRESHEREE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds RUTH ECKERD HALL INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH LAKELAND DISCOVERY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP JORN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MANITOWISH WATERS BIKE TRAIL INC ↗
  • Who funds KART 4 KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT FOR THE PEOPLE OF PARAGUAY ↗
  • Who funds APTIV FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KELLER FAMILY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LymeLight Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SCHOLL COMMUNITY IMPACT GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds MANITOWISH WATERS LAKES ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Clack Foundation IncWI15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Clack Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Baer Family Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Baer Family Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Baer Family Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Baer Family Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Baer Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph