Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Baer Family Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$199k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$143k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$315kFood & Nutrition$145kArts & Culture$94kRecreation & Sports$47kReligion$23kEducation$19kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kInternational$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $6k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $193k
$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$300k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROCK RIVER THRESHEREE INC$142,801
MAYO CLINIC$50,000
ST ANTHONY'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$3,000
KART 4 KIDS$2,000
SCHOOL COMMUNITY INPACT GROUP$500
MANITO ART LEAGUE$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%KELLER FAMILY COMMUNITY FUND: $1k → 11%LYMELIGHT FOUNDATION: $1k → 7%APTIV FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%KELLER FAMILY COMMUNITY FUND: $1k → 11%SCHOOL COMMUNITY INPACT GROUP: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$167k · 15 repeat orgs$196k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +62% since the first grant, against -16% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
12

Total granted

$167k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
-16%

Still filing today

47%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 4% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $143k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureRecreation & SportsInternationalEnvironmentHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RE
    RUTH ECKERD HALL INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $38k · revenue +46%
  • NL
    NORTH LAKELAND DISCOVERY CENTER INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $26k · revenue +72%
  • CJ
    CAMP JORN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC
    5× · 2018–2023 · $18k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • MW
    MANITOWISH WATERS FIRE CO
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • MW
    MANITOWISH WATERS BIKE TRAIL INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -16%
  • FE
    FUNDACION ESPERANZA
    one grant, 2019 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mayo Clinic Group Return

To inspire hope and contribute to health and well-being by providing the best care to every patient through integrated clinical practice, education, and research.

Health
2
Adirondack Ski Touring Council Inc

To maintain over 100 miles of cross country ski and mountain bike trails in the vicinity of lake placid, new york.

Youth Development
3
The Mark O'connell Foundation for Lake Winnipesaukee Safety
Environment
4
Wisconsin State Golf Association Inc

The wisconsin state golf association was formed and exists for the general purpose of promoting and conserving, throughout the state of wisconsin, the best interests and the true spirit of the game of golf. included within the general…

5
MadHatter Cycling
Recreation & Sports
6
Whitewater Valley Railroad Association Inc

The whitewater valley railroad is a heritage railroad dedicated to the preservation and presentation of branch line railroading.

Arts & Culture
7
Friends of the Fred Meijer River Valley Rail-Trails

To foster and facilitate the conversion of greenways and railroad rights- of-way in the counties of ionia, kent, and montcalm to non-mototized trails for the use of the general public.

Philanthropy
8
Wmc Litigation Center Inc

The wmc litigation center's mission is to represent clients in legal actions to foster and protect the free enterprise system.

Education
9
Removing the Barriers Initiative Inc

Removing the barriers initiative was founded in 2011 for the purpose of removing barriers to great expeniences for people and families with disabilities, differences and special needs. we started by assisting camps who served campers with…

Human Services
10
The Mendota Gridiron Club Inc

Raise funds to aid the division of intercollegiate athletics of the university of wisconsin - madison in furthering its football program.

11
Minnesota Quarter Midget Race Asso

To provide a platform for youth racing

12
Bicycle Rides Northwest

Cycling

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Scholl Community Impact Group Inc and the most unlike its peers is Project for the People of Paraguay. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MAYO CLINIC — $300,000 · HealthMAYO CLINIC+1 more — $9,500 · HealthROCK RIVER THRESHEREE ASSOCIATION — $142,801 · OtherROCK RIVER THRESHEREE ASSOCIATIONMANITOWISH WATERS HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $25,759 · OtherMANITOWISH WATERS HISTORICAL SOCIETYNORTH LAKELAND SCHOOL DISTRICT — $13,500 · OtherNORTH LAKELAND SCHOOL DISTRICTMANITOWISH WATERS FIRE CO — $10,000 · OtherFUNDACION ESPERANZA — $10,000 · OtherWINMAN TRAILS FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Other+12 more — $32,714 · Other+12 moreRUTH ECKERD HALL INC — $38,400 · Arts & CultureRUTH ECKERD…NORTH LAKELAND DISCOVERY CENTER INC — $26,355 · Arts & CultureNORTH LAKEL…CAMP JORN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC — $17,750 · Recreation & SportsMANITOWISH WATERS BIKE TRAIL INC — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsAPTIV FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesKELLER FAMILY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,000 · Human ServicesLymeLight Foundation — $1,000 · Human ServicesSCHOLL COMMUNITY IMPACT GROUP INC — $500 · Human ServicesPROJECT FOR THE PEOPLE OF PARAGUAY — $7,304 · InternationalMANITOWISH WATERS LAKES ASSOCIATION INC — $400 · Environment
Health$309,500Other$244,774Arts & Culture$64,755Recreation & Sports$27,750Human Services$8,500International$7,304Environment$400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMAYO CLINIC — $300,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetROCK RIVER THRESHEREE ASSOCIATION — $142,801 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetRUTH ECKERD HALL INC — $38,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH LAKELAND DISCOVERY CENTER INC — $26,355 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetCAMP JORN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC — $17,750 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMANITOWISH WATERS BIKE TRAIL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetKART 4 KIDS INC — $9,500 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetPROJECT FOR THE PEOPLE OF PARAGUAY — $7,304 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetAPTIV FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKELLER FAMILY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetLymeLight Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSCHOLL COMMUNITY IMPACT GROUP INC — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMANITOWISH WATERS LAKES ASSOCIATION INC — $400 over 4y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC
  • Who funds ROCK RIVER THRESHEREE ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds RUTH ECKERD HALL INC
  • Who funds NORTH LAKELAND DISCOVERY CENTER INC
  • Who funds CAMP JORN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds MANITOWISH WATERS BIKE TRAIL INC
  • Who funds KART 4 KIDS INC
  • Who funds PROJECT FOR THE PEOPLE OF PARAGUAY
  • Who funds APTIV FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds KELLER FAMILY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LymeLight Foundation
  • Who funds SCHOLL COMMUNITY IMPACT GROUP INC
  • Who funds MANITOWISH WATERS LAKES ASSOCIATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Clack Foundation IncWI15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Clack Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Baer Family Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Baer Family Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Baer Family Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph