Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bacca Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$5.4MEducation$1.2MArts & Culture$560kCommunity Improvement$465kEnvironment$115kHuman Services$10kReligion$10k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $383k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.3M
$35,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$36M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$1,000,000
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA$250,000
BRAVO VAIL$125,000
DAVIDSON COLLEGE$108,000
VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION$100,000
GREENHOUSE SCHOLARS$50,000
CAL-WOOD EDUCATION CENTER$35,000
PARLANDO INCORPORATED$20,000
I HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION$20,000
BOULDER COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION$10,000
SERVE 68$10,000
ROOTS MUSIC PROJECT FOUNDATION$10,000
VAIL VETERANS FOUNDATION INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SERVE 68: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Bacca Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Bacca Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.9M · 9 repeat orgs$377k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
2

Total granted

$6.9M
$347k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+15%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Davidson College
    5× · 2021–2025 · $565k · revenue +52%
  • GS
    GREENHOUSE SCHOLARS
    3× · 2023–2025 · $180k · revenue +42%
  • CE
    Cal-Wood Education Center
    4× · 2022–2025 · $115k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • TA
    THE AMERICAN SCHOOL IN LONDON FOUNDATION (UK) LTD
    one grant, 2020 · $337k
  • BC
    BOULDER COMMUNITY HEALTH
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
2
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
3
The Vermont Community Foundation

The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.

Philanthropy
4
Mental Health Center of Boulder County Inc

Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.

—
5
Barton Institute for Community Action

The barton institute supports leaders and their communities who are working to develop and foster places for opportunity, connection, and belonging in metro denver.

Philanthropy
6
Denver Children's Choir

To provide a challenging environment where children can reach their full potential by enhancing their musical talents, forging diverse meaningful friendships, and sharing their joy of music with others.

Arts & Culture
7
Aia Colorado

AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…

—
8
Rogue Climate

Rogue Climate's mission is to empower Southern Oregon communities most impacted by climate change including low-income, rural, youth, seniors & communities of color, to win climate justice by organizing for clean energy, sustainable jobs &…

Education
9
Leadership Indianapolis Inc

Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.

Public Benefit
10
Vail Health Services

Vail health services is the parent company of a group of companies generally known as vail health, whose mission is to elevate health across our mountain communities.

Health
11
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
12
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boulder Community Health Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Roots Music Project Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $5,000,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITALBRAVO VAIL: $475,000 · OtherBRAVO VAILUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $350,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIATHE AMERICAN SCHOOL IN LONDON FOUNDATION (UK) LTD: $336,987 · OtherTHE AMERICAN SCHOOL IN LONDON FOUNDATION (UK) LTDDavidson College: $565,000 · EducationDavidson C…GREENHOUSE SCHOLARS: $180,025 · EducationGREENHOUSE…VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION: $465,000 · Community ImprovementCal-Wood Education Center: $115,000 · EnvironmentI HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION: $85,000 · Crime & LegalPARLANDO INCORPORATED: $75,000 · Arts & CultureROOTS MUSIC PROJECT FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Arts & CultureBOULDER COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $55,000 · HealthBOULDER COMMUNITY HEALTH: $10,000 · HealthSERVE 6 8: $10,000 · Human ServicesVAIL VETERANS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Human Services
Other$6,161,987Education$745,025Community Improvement$465,000Environment$115,000Crime & Legal$85,000Arts & Culture$85,000Health$65,000Human Services$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDavidson College: $565,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetVAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION: $465,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetGREENHOUSE SCHOLARS: $180,025 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetCal-Wood Education Center: $115,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetI HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION: $85,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetPARLANDO INCORPORATED: $75,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetBOULDER COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBOULDER COMMUNITY HEALTH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSERVE 6 8: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVAIL VETERANS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Davidson College ↗
  • Who funds VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREENHOUSE SCHOLARS ↗
  • Who funds Cal-Wood Education Center ↗
  • Who funds I HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PARLANDO INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds BOULDER COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOULDER COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds SERVE 6 8 ↗
  • Who funds VAIL VETERANS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ROOTS MUSIC PROJECT FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bacca Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bacca Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bacca’s filings →

    More from the funding graph