· Private foundation
Baby Save Foundation III
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k23 grants · $52k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $26k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NATURE'S NURSERY | $13,500 |
| ST FRANCIS HIGH SCHOOL | $12,000 |
| DOVE FOUNDATION | $8,400 |
| ADOPT AMERICA NETWORK | $8,000 |
| MOSAIC MINISTRIES | $7,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| R SERVICE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| SISTERS OF THE VISITATION | $2,400 |
| ST MARTIN DE PORRES | $2,100 |
| SUNSHINE COMMUNITIES | $2,000 |
| TOLEDO CLASSIC | $1,500 |
| ALLIANCE FOR PAIRED KIDNEY DONATION | $1,500 |
| FOUNDATION FOR LIFE | $1,100 |
| CATHOLIC CLUB | $1,000 |
| ST JOHN JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +68% since the first grant, against +42% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NNNATURES NURSERY CENTER FOR WILDLIFE REHAB & CONSR4× · 2020–2025 · $75k · revenue +68%
- HSHISTORIC SOUTH INITIATIVE3× · 2020–2024 · $55k · revenue +353%
- FFFOUNDATION FOR LIFE4× · 2020–2025 · $8k · revenue +46%
Funded once
- DDoveone grant, 2023 · $25k
- TTTOLEDO TOMORROWgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +41%
- MOMONASTERY OF THE VISITATIONone grant, 2022 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide christian based outreach to clients by providing services and information free of charge to anyone in a crisis pregnancy situation, with the goal of assisting the client to carry the pregnancy to term and with continued care…
To partner with leaders globally to boldly proclaim the biblical truth of the father's heart for life, champion the gospel of jesus christ, and establish life-giving ministries.
To provide a temporary home and on-going support for pregnant women, and women with newborns over the age of 18 who are alone. counseling and educational programs prepare these women to make loving and informed decisions for themselves and…
The birth center dba lifecycle wellness and birth center is an independent non-profit organization and free-standing, out-of-hospital birth center. our team of midwives and nurse-practitioners provide empowering gynecology and…
To provide children of working and student parents with quality, affordable childcare programs devoted to enhancing the child's educational, social, emotional, and physical development. to provide also the parent with the childcare…
To care for, engage, and inspire our community to reimagine and maximize quality of life at every age.
A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.
To promote Christian child care and foster care networks in developing nations
To protect the unborn, share the gospel, and transform our communities one life at a time.
Planned parenthood of greater ohio strengthens individuals, families and communities by promoting healthy and responsible decision-making about parenthood, relationships, and sexual health.
See schedule o.education of the heart: cabrini university was a catholic institution of higher education. the cabrini legacy corporation exists to protect the legacy of the former university.cabrini university was a catholic institution of…
The relentless pursuit of optimal health for every child within our reach.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Adopt America Network and the most unlike its peers is Foundation for Life. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATURES NURSERY CENTER FOR WILDLIFE REHAB & CONSR ↗
- Who funds HISTORIC SOUTH INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds TOLEDO TOMORROW ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR LIFE ↗
- Who funds ADOPT AMERICA NETWORK ↗
- Who funds THE DOVE FUND ↗
- Who funds OFF THE STREETS INC ↗
- Who funds EMERSON SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds BELLA VITA NETWORK ↗
- Who funds BABY UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds SUNSHINE COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds TOLEDO CLASSIC INC ↗
- Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE PADUA CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Toledo Community Foundation Inc · The O-I Charities Foundation · The Lanterman Foundation · Andersons Foundation · Robert C and Susan M Savage Family Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · John Henry Eldred Jr Foundation · Auto Dealers United for Children · Designetics Cares Foundation · The LaValley Foundation · The Mark S Feldstein and Sandra a Feldstein · United Way of Greater Toledo
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Baby Save Foundation III funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Baby Save Foundation III?
Find your warmest path to Baby Save Foundation III through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.