Skip to content

· Private foundation

B J Killian Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$510k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$1.0MHuman Services$495kArts & Culture$355kYouth Development$260kHousing & Shelter$190kHealth$140kFood & Nutrition$115kCrime & Legal$110kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $433k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$7.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OWENSBORO COMMUNITY COLLEGE$55,000
SENIOR COMMUNITY CENTER$35,000
APOLLO HIGH SCHOOL$35,000
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY (STLOUIS)$30,000
KENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE$30,000
HELP OFFICE OF OWENSBORO INC$25,000
GOVERNOR'S SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS$25,000
WKU STUDENT LIFE FOUNDATION$22,500
KET$20,000
CLIFF HAGAN BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$20,000
Owensboro Family YMCA$20,000
RIVERPARK CENTER$20,000
CASA OF OHIO VALLEY INC$20,000
GIRLS INC$20,000
OWENSBORO SCIENCE MUSEUM$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $180k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BOULWARE MISSION INC: $15k → 13%BOULWARE MISSION INC: $15k → 13%BOULWARE MISSION INC: $15k → 13%BOULWARE MISSION INC: $15k → 13%BOULWARE MISSION INC: $15k → 13%BOULWARE MISSION INC: $15k → 13%Hospice of Western Kentucky: $8k → 13%Hospice of Western Kentucky: $8k → 13%GOODFELLOWS CLUB OF OWENSBORO: $8k → 13%Hospice of Western Kentucky: $8k → 13%GOODFELLOWS CLUB OF OWENSBORO: $8k → 13%GOODFELLOWS CLUB OF OWENSBORO: $8k → 13%Hospice of Western Kentucky: $8k → 13%Hospice of Western Kentucky: $8k → 13%GOODFELLOWS CLUB OF OWENSBORO: $8k → 13%Hospice of Western Kentucky: $8k → 13%GOODFELLOWS CLUB OF OWENSBORO: $8k → 13%GOODFELLOWS CLUB OF OWENSBORO: $8k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of B J Killian Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 94% of the giving stays in KY; by stated purpose, 92%.

B J Killian Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.7% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 33 repeat orgs$205k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
5

Total granted

$2.8M
$95k

Still filing today

45%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $170k · revenue +33%
  • WS
    WKU Student Life Foundation Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $115k · revenue +16%
  • CH
    CLIFF HAGAN BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $110k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • TK
    TEAM KENTUCKY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • OR
    OWENSBORO RIVERPARK CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • SB
    St Benedict Shelter
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Owensboro Chamber of Commerce Inc

Providing leadership, advocacy and member services that foster growth and economic prosperity for our region.

—
2
Goodwill Industries of Kentucky Inc

Goodwill's mission is to help people with disabilities or other disadvantages achieve and maintain employment to gain a better quality of life.

Employment
3
Owensborodaviess County Regional Dental Clinic Inc

To provide basic dental services to low income individuals and families that either have no form of dental insurance or rely upon medicaid.

Health
4
Westcare Kentucky Inc

To provide substance abuse prevention & treatment.

Health
5
Oasis Womens Center

Assist victims of domestic violence & prevention

Human Services
6
Ohio Valley Goodwill Industries

The mission of ohio valley goodwill industries rehabilitation center, inc. is to provide vocational rehabilitation, training, and employment services to individuals with either disabilities or social and economic barriers to full employment

—
7
Oswego County Opportunities Inc

To inspire partnerships and provide services that empower people, support communities and change lives.

Human Services
8
Owensboro Health Inc

Owensboro health, inc. exists to heal the sick and improve the health of the communities we serve.

Health
9
Pregnancy Center of Owensboro Inc

Meeting the spiritual and physical needs of women facing crises concerning pregnancies.

Health
10
Owensboro Health Medical Group Inc

Owensboro health medical group, inc. exists to heal the sick and improve the health of the community.

Health
11
Hospice of Southern Kentucky Inc

The hospice mission is to honor life through exceptional service and compassionate care. the organization is primarily engaged in providing care and support that enables the terminally ill to spend their final days in a comfortable and…

—
12
Child Watch Counseling and Advocacy Center Inc

To provide families in western kentucky with education, advocacy and treatment that prevents child abuse, encourages family stability, promotes healthy relationships, enhances well-being and cultivates safe, nurturing families.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Owensboro Area Shelter Information and Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Independence Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OWENSBORO COMMUNTIY COLLEGE: $215,000 · OtherOWENSBORO COMMUNTIY COLLEGEWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY (STLOUIS): $170,000 · OtherWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY (STLOUIS)DAVIESS COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION: $160,000 · OtherDAVIESS COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATIONGOVERNOR'S SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS: $120,000 · OtherGOVERNOR'S SCHOOL FOR THE ARTSFamily Y of Owensboro-Daviess Co: $110,000 · OtherFamily Y of Owensboro-Daviess CoSENIOR COMMUNITY CENTER: $100,000 · OtherKET: $95,000 · OtherOWENSBORO AREA SHELTER INFORMATION AND SERVICES INC: $90,000 · OtherOWENSBORO SCIENCE MUSEUM: $80,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS: $70,000 · OtherHL NEBLETT COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $65,000 · Other+19 more: $655,000 · Other+19 moreKENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE: $170,000 · EducationKENTUCKY WESLEYAN…WKU Student Life Foundation Inc: $115,000 · EducationWKU Student Life …GIRLS INCORPORATED OF OWENSBORO-DAV COUNTY: $110,000 · EducationGIRLS INCORPORATE…BRESCIA UNIVERSITY INC: $80,000 · EducationBRESCIA UNIVERSIT…BOULWARE MISSION INC: $90,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE OF THE OHIO VALLEY INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesGOODFELLOWS CLUB OF OWENSBORO KENTUCKY INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesCLIFF HAGAN BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $110,000 · Youth DevelopmentCASA OF OHIO VALLEY INC: $110,000 · Civil RightsRIVERPARK CENTER INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureDANIEL PITINO SHELTER INC: $60,000 · Housing & ShelterIndependence Foundation Inc: $30,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,930,000Education$475,000Human Services$180,000Youth Development$110,000Civil Rights$110,000Arts & Culture$100,000Housing & Shelter$60,000Philanthropy$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE: $170,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWKU Student Life Foundation Inc: $115,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCLIFF HAGAN BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $110,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetCASA OF OHIO VALLEY INC: $110,000 over 6y, 5.7% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF OWENSBORO-DAV COUNTY: $110,000 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetFamily Y of Owensboro-Daviess Co: $110,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetRIVERPARK CENTER INC: $100,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetOWENSBORO AREA SHELTER INFORMATION AND SERVICES INC: $90,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetBOULWARE MISSION INC: $90,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetBRESCIA UNIVERSITY INC: $80,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHL NEBLETT COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $65,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetDANIEL PITINO SHELTER INC: $60,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetTHEATRE WORKSHOP OF OWENSBORO INC: $45,000 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetHOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE OF THE OHIO VALLEY INC: $45,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGOODFELLOWS CLUB OF OWENSBORO KENTUCKY INC: $45,000 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetIndependence Foundation Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds WKU Student Life Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CLIFF HAGAN BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF OHIO VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF OWENSBORO-DAV COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Family Y of Owensboro-Daviess Co ↗
  • Who funds RIVERPARK CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds OWENSBORO AREA SHELTER INFORMATION AND SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds BOULWARE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds BRESCIA UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds HL NEBLETT COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds DANIEL PITINO SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THEATRE WORKSHOP OF OWENSBORO INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE OF THE OHIO VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds GOODFELLOWS CLUB OF OWENSBORO KENTUCKY INC ↗
  • Who funds Independence Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds HELP OFFICE OF OWENSBORO INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Owensboro Health IncKY32.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Owensboro Health Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · Marilyn & William Young Charitable Foundation Inc C/O Sara Hemingway Ex Di · Public Life Foundation of Owensboro · Lester E Yeager Charitable Trust B · United Way of the Ohio Valley Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation Inc · Impact 100 - Owensboro Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · Michael E Horn Family Foundation Inc Ima · Fraternal Order of Eagles Aerie 4168

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization B J Killian Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from B J Killian Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on B J Killian’s filings →

    More from the funding graph