Skip to content
B Gill Clements Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

B Gill Clements Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$597k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$1.1MEnvironment$405kArts & Culture$372kFood & Nutrition$225kEducation$172kAnimals$158kHuman Services$110kInternational$80kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $264k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $320k
$30,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
McClaren Northern Michigan Foundati$110,000
Baylor Healthcare Systems Foundatio$100,000
Dallas Arboretum$60,000
North Texas Food Bank$50,000
STABLE STRIDES EQUINE THERAPY$45,000
Chapel Hill Public Schools$42,600
Manna Food Project$30,000
Mementous$30,000
Perot Museum$30,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
Kershaws Challenge$15,000
National Snaffle Bit Association$15,000
Denton County Veterans Coalition$11,741
THE STEWPOT$10,000
MBH GAINESVILLE DBA MY BROTHERS HOU$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 53% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%Denton County Veterans Coalition: $20k → 8%Southwestern Diabetic Association: $50k → 11%Mementous: $30k → 14%Open Doors Foundation: $20k → 14%Conservation Resource Association: $100k → 7%Manna Food Project: $30k → 9%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITA: $30k → 17%Chapel Hill Public Schools: $64k → 13%Tommy Nobis Center: $80k → 8%Table Ministries: $15k → 9%National Snaffle Bit Association: $60k → 8%Southwestern Diabetic Association: $45k → 11%Mementous: $15k → 14%Conservation Resource Association: $100k → 7%Manna Food Project: $15k → 9%Chapel Hill Public Schools: $43k → 13%Tommy Nobis Center: $25k → 8%National Snaffle Bit Association: $15k → 8%Southwestern Diabetic Association: $35k → 11%Mementous: $15k → 14%Conservation Resource Association: $75k → 7%Manna Food Project: $15k → 9%Chapel Hill Public Schools: $35k → 13%Fulton County School System: $30k → 8%Baylor Healthcare Systems Foundatio: $100k → 14%Baylor Healthcare Systems Foundatio: $100k → 14%STABLE STRIDES EQUINE THERAPY: $50k → 8%STABLE STRIDES EQUINE THERAPY: $45k → 8%Baylor Healthcare Systems Foundatio: $80k → 14%Dallas Arboretum: $60k → 14%Dallas Arboretum: $25k → 14%Dallas Arboretum: $20k → 14%McClaren Northern Michigan Foundati: $110k → 9%McClaren Northern Michigan Foundati: $87k → 9%McClaren Northern Michigan Foundati: $81k → 9%North Texas Food Bank: $50k → 14%McClaren Northern Michigan Foundati: $80k → 9%Perot Museum: $35k → 14%McClaren Northern Michigan Foundati: $36k → 9%Perot Museum: $35k → 14%Perot Museum: $35k → 14%Perot Museum: $30k → 14%Perot Museum: $30k → 14%Perot Museum: $20k → 14%North Texas Food Bank: $20k → 14%Equest Therapeutic Horsemanship: $75k → 14%Equest Therapeutic Horsemanship: $50k → 14%Equest Therapeutic Horsemanship: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
CT
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 22 repeat orgs$130k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
7

Total granted

$2.7M
$105k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+28%

Still filing today

50%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureEnvironmentPhilanthropyAnimalsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MN
    MCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2025 · $394k · revenue +42%
  • BH
    Baylor Health Care System Foundation
    3× · 2023–2025 · $280k · revenue +82%
  • DA
    DALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $130k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • FC
    Fulton County School System
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • OD
    Open Doors Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • DL
    Dallas Life Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northern Michigan Hematology and Oncology

Provide professional services for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer and infectious disease and related conditions.

Health
2
Mclaren Northern Michigan

Mclaren health care, through its subsidiaries, will be the best value in health care as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

Health
3
The Cardiac Institute

Our mission is to help people to live longer, healthier lives with dignity, and to use all of our resources to give them everything they expect and deserve in comprehensive cardiovascular care for their families and themselves.

Health
4
Trinity Health - Michigan

We, trinity health-michigan and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. trinity health-michigan is a member of trinity health.

Health
5
Mymichigan Medical Center Midland

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
6
Trinity Health Grand Haven Hospital

We, trinity health grand haven hospital and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.trinity health grand haven hospital is a member of trinity…

Health
7
Mclaren Greater Lansing

Mclaren health care corporation, along with its subsidiaries, will be michigan's best value in healthcare as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

Health
8
North Shore Health System Medical Faculty Group Practice

North shore health system medical faculty group practice (the corporation) functions as an extension of the northwell health hospitals by bringing medical care to community settings, providing care to medicare, medicaid, and other…

Health
9
Mclaren Port Huron

Mclaren healthcare, through its subsidiaries, will be the best value in healthcare as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

Health
10
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
11
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
12
Mymichigan Health Foundation

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes by conducting or supporting activites exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mclaren Northern Michigan Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Baylor Health Care System Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
13/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Conservation Resource Association: $275,000 · OtherConservation Resource AssociationPerot Museum: $185,000 · OtherPerot MuseumBaylor Scott White Hospital: $180,000 · OtherBaylor Scott White HospitalIndividual grant recipient: $150,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientChapel Hill Public Schools: $141,600 · OtherChapel Hill Public SchoolsSouthwestern Diabetic Association: $130,000 · OtherSouthwestern Diabetic AssociationNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $120,000 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANKNATIONAL SNAFFLE BIT ASSOCIATION INC: $115,000 · OtherNATIONAL SNAFFLE BIT ASSOCIATION INCTOMMY NOBIS CENTER INC: $105,000 · OtherTOMMY NOBIS CENTER INCTHE MANNA FOOD PROJECT INC DBA - THE MANNA FOOD PROJECT: $95,000 · OtherSTABLE STRIDES EQUINE THERAPY: $95,000 · OtherMementous: $80,000 · OtherDENTON COUNTY VETERANS COALITION: $70,982 · Other+10 more: $132,000 · Other+10 moreMCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATION: $393,500 · HealthMCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FO…Baylor Health Care System Foundation: $280,000 · HealthBaylor Health Care System Fo…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $36,000 · HealthDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $130,000 · EnvironmentKERSHAW'S CHALLENGE: $80,000 · PhilanthropyLITTLE TRAVERSE BAY HUMANE SOCIETY: $37,500 · AnimalsGreat Lakes Center for the Arts: $25,000 · Arts & CultureHARBOR SPRINGS LYRIC THEATRE: $4,500 · Arts & CultureTEXAS COALITION FOR ANIMAL PROTECTION: $5,000 · Education
Other$1,874,582Health$709,500Environment$130,000Philanthropy$80,000Animals$37,500Arts & Culture$29,500Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATION: $393,500 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetBaylor Health Care System Foundation: $280,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $130,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $120,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL SNAFFLE BIT ASSOCIATION INC: $115,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetTHE MANNA FOOD PROJECT INC DBA - THE MANNA FOOD PROJECT: $95,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetKERSHAW'S CHALLENGE: $80,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetLITTLE TRAVERSE BAY HUMANE SOCIETY: $37,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $36,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGreat Lakes Center for the Arts: $25,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetKIDS IN CRISIS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHARBOR SPRINGS LYRIC THEATRE: $4,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Baylor Health Care System Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL SNAFFLE BIT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TOMMY NOBIS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MANNA FOOD PROJECT INC DBA - THE MANNA FOOD PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds KERSHAW'S CHALLENGE ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE TRAVERSE BAY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Great Lakes Center for the Arts ↗
  • Who funds KIDS IN CRISIS INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS COALITION FOR ANIMAL PROTECTION ↗
  • Who funds HARBOR SPRINGS LYRIC THEATRE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Offield Family Fo…Petoskey-Harbor Sprin…Frey FoundationMorgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Offield Family FoundationIL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Offield Family Foundation · Petoskey-Harbor Springs Area Community Foundation · Frey Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization B Gill Clements Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from B Gill Clements Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 49%
  • Kids in Crisis Inc: 49% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on B Gill Clements’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home