Skip to content

· Private foundation

B E C K Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$26k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$63kHealth$23kInternational$16kHuman Services$600Youth Development$205Education$100Other$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$641
Median grant
6
States reached
$48k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VALLEY FREE CHURCH$11,000
ABOVE AND BEYOND CANCER$5,000
B2 THE WORLD$2,004
INNERVISIONS HEALTH CARE$2,000
CRU MINISTRIES$1,800
INTERNATIONAL MESSENGERS$1,200
MAGNOLIA BIBLE CHURCH$750
COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL$641
SINGLE PARENT PROVISION$500
SELF HELP INTERNATIONAL$500
STRANDS OF STRENGTH$500
CALVERY CHAPEL CHINO HILLS$108
DMACC EDUCATION$100
Individual grant recipient$100
BLACK WOMEN FOR HEALTHY LIVING$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%INNERVISIONS HEALTH CARE: $2k → 5%INNERVISIONS HEALTH CARE: $2k → 5%INNERVISIONS HEALTH CARE: $2k → 5%INNERVISIONS HEALTH CARE: $2k → 5%INNERVISIONS HEALTH CARE: $2k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IA
CA
CO
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 90% of B E C K Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 72% of the giving stays in IA; by stated purpose, 7%.

B E C K Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$93k · 10 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +42% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
7

Total granted

$93k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+42%

Still filing today

40%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesEducationReligionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HUMAN CHOICE OF IOWA
    5× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +69%
  • IM
    International Messengers
    6× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +32%
  • SO
    STRANDS OF STRENGTH INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $2k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • GLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +18%
  • LF
    Lighthouse Family Retreat Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $250 · revenue +47%
  • ES
    EAST SIDE FAMILY CLINIC
    one grant, 2024 · $250
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
2
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
3
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
4
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
5
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
6
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
7
I58 Global

i58 Global is a Christian ministry dedicated to recruiting, sending and organizing relief workers to provide aid and share hope to refugees in various European countries.

Human Services
8
Children's Cancer Connection

Connecting families affected by childhood cancer by providing opportunities that encourage relationships and strengthen community.

—
9
Emerge Global Inc

Biblical support of single moms. To encourage and support single moms to thrive and not just survive.

Human Services
10
Handicap International

Handicap international dba humanity & inclusion (hi) works with people with disabilities and people living in situations of vulnerability, including poverty, exclusion, conflict, and disaster.

International
11
Lifeway Mission International

Provide humanitarian aid and christian discipleship.

Human Services
12
Freedom in Christ Ministries

To provide resources, training, and continuing support to leaders in the us and around the world in order that they may help others find freedom in christ.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Global Outreach International Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VALLEY FREE CHURCH: $42,000 · OtherVALLEY FREE CHURCHB2 THE WORLD: $12,024 · OtherB2 THE WORLDCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST: $10,200 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRISTMERCY FOUNDATION: $5,100 · OtherMERCY FOUNDATION+6 more: $3,658 · OtherTHE HUMAN CHOICE OF IOWA: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE HUMAN C…+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesABOVE AND BEYOND CANCER INC: $5,000 · HealthSTRANDS OF STRENGTH INC: $2,400 · Health+3 more: $550 · HealthInternational Messengers: $7,200 · ReligionCompassion International Incorporated: $1,746 · InternationalSELF-HELP INTERNATIONAL: $1,250 · InternationalGLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 · InternationalSINGLE PARENT PROVISION: $500 · EducationDMACC FOUNDATION: $100 · EducationFREEDOM FOR YOUTH MINISTRIES: $205 · Youth Development
Other$72,982Human Services$10,100Health$7,950Religion$7,200International$3,996Education$600Youth Development$205

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE HUMAN CHOICE OF IOWA: $10,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetInternational Messengers: $7,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetABOVE AND BEYOND CANCER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSTRANDS OF STRENGTH INC: $2,400 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSELF-HELP INTERNATIONAL: $1,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSINGLE PARENT PROVISION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLighthouse Family Retreat Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM FOR YOUTH MINISTRIES: $205 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDes Moines Refugee Support: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELLIPSIS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDMACC FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HUMAN CHOICE OF IOWA ↗
  • Who funds International Messengers ↗
  • Who funds ABOVE AND BEYOND CANCER INC ↗
  • Who funds STRANDS OF STRENGTH INC ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds SELF-HELP INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SINGLE PARENT PROVISION ↗
  • Who funds Lighthouse Family Retreat Inc ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM FOR YOUTH MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Des Moines Refugee Support ↗
  • Who funds ELLIPSIS INC ↗
  • Who funds DMACC FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community FdnIA16.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Mary K and Daniel M Kelly Family Foundation C/O Dan Kelly · The Merchants Bonding Company Foundation · Meredith Corporation Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · R & R Realty Group Foundation · EMC Insurance Foundation · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization B E C K Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from B E C K Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on B E C K’s filings →

    More from the funding graph