Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

B E C K Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$26k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Religion$63kHealth$23kInternational$16kHuman Services$600Youth Development$205Education$100Other$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$641
Median grant
6
States reached
$48k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VALLEY FREE CHURCH$11,000
ABOVE AND BEYOND CANCER$5,000
B2 THE WORLD$2,004
INNERVISIONS HEALTH CARE$2,000
CRU MINISTRIES$1,800
INTERNATIONAL MESSENGERS$1,200
MAGNOLIA BIBLE CHURCH$750
COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL$641
SELF HELP INTERNATIONAL$500
SINGLE PARENT PROVISION$500
STRANDS OF STRENGTH$500
CALVERY CHAPEL CHINO HILLS$108
DMACC EDUCATION$100
Individual grant recipient$100
BLACK WOMEN FOR HEALTHY LIVING$50
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%INNERVISIONS HEALTH CARE: $2k → 5%INNERVISIONS HEALTH CARE: $2k → 5%INNERVISIONS HEALTH CARE: $2k → 5%INNERVISIONS HEALTH CARE: $2k → 5%INNERVISIONS HEALTH CARE: $2k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
IA
CA
CO
MS
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 90% of B E C K Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 72% of the giving stays in IA; read by stated purpose it is 7% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

B E C K Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$93k · 10 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +42% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
7

Total granted

$93k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+42%

Still filing today

40%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesEducationReligionYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HUMAN CHOICE OF IOWA
    5× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +54%
  • IM
    International Messengers
    6× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +32%
  • SO
    STRANDS OF STRENGTH INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $2k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • GLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +18%
  • ES
    EAST SIDE FAMILY CLINIC
    one grant, 2024 · $250
  • LF
    Lighthouse Family Retreat Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $250 · revenue +47%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
2
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
3
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
4
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
5
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
6
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
7
I58 Global

i58 Global is a Christian ministry dedicated to recruiting, sending and organizing relief workers to provide aid and share hope to refugees in various European countries.

Human Services
8
Children's Cancer Connection

Connecting families affected by childhood cancer by providing opportunities that encourage relationships and strengthen community.

9
Emerge Global Inc

Biblical support of single moms. To encourage and support single moms to thrive and not just survive.

Human Services
10
Handicap International

Handicap international dba humanity & inclusion (hi) works with people with disabilities and people living in situations of vulnerability, including poverty, exclusion, conflict, and disaster.

International
11
Lifeway Mission International

Provide humanitarian aid and christian discipleship.

Human Services
12
Freedom in Christ Ministries

To provide resources, training, and continuing support to leaders in the us and around the world in order that they may help others find freedom in christ.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Global Outreach International Inc and the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VALLEY FREE CHURCH — $42,000 · OtherVALLEY FREE CHURCHB2 THE WORLD — $12,024 · OtherB2 THE WORLDCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST — $10,200 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRISTMERCY FOUNDATION — $5,100 · OtherMERCY FOUNDATION+6 more — $3,658 · OtherTHE HUMAN CHOICE OF IOWA — $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE HUMAN C…+1 more — $100 · Human ServicesABOVE AND BEYOND CANCER INC — $5,000 · HealthSTRANDS OF STRENGTH INC — $2,400 · Health+3 more — $550 · HealthInternational Messengers — $7,200 · ReligionCompassion International Incorporated — $1,746 · InternationalSELF-HELP INTERNATIONAL — $1,250 · InternationalGLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC — $1,000 · InternationalSINGLE PARENT PROVISION — $500 · EducationDMACC FOUNDATION — $100 · EducationFREEDOM FOR YOUTH MINISTRIES — $205 · Youth Development
Other$72,982Human Services$10,100Health$7,950Religion$7,200International$3,996Education$600Youth Development$205

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE HUMAN CHOICE OF IOWA — $10,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetInternational Messengers — $7,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTRANDS OF STRENGTH INC — $2,400 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSELF-HELP INTERNATIONAL — $1,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSINGLE PARENT PROVISION — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLighthouse Family Retreat Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM FOR YOUTH MINISTRIES — $205 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDMACC FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDes Moines Refugee Support — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELLIPSIS INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HUMAN CHOICE OF IOWA
  • Who funds International Messengers
  • Who funds ABOVE AND BEYOND CANCER INC
  • Who funds STRANDS OF STRENGTH INC
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated
  • Who funds SELF-HELP INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds GLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds SINGLE PARENT PROVISION
  • Who funds Lighthouse Family Retreat Inc
  • Who funds FREEDOM FOR YOUTH MINISTRIES
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds DMACC FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Des Moines Refugee Support
  • Who funds ELLIPSIS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community FdnIA16.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Mary K and Daniel M Kelly Family Foundation C/O Dan Kelly · The Merchants Bonding Company Foundation · Meredith Corporation Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · R & R Realty Group Foundation · EMC Insurance Foundation · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization B E C K Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph