Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Azb Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$519k
Granted FY2024still arriving
44
Grants FY2024still arriving
16
States reached
$63k
Largest
01What you fund
0184% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$2.1MEducation$281kCivil Rights$225kHealth$203kScience & Tech$162kFood & Nutrition$88kHuman Services$71kInternational$54kOther$0
02FY2024 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k24 grants · $82k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $374k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $63k
$6,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$618k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTMINISTER SCHOOLS OF AUGUSTA$63,000
VARIOUS INDIVIDUALS WESTMINSTER$36,000
COLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIV$30,000
ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
ASSOCIATES FOR BIBLICAL RESEARCH$25,000
KIOKEE BAPTIST CHURCH$24,000
IMB$20,000
INSTITUE FOR CREATION RESEARCH$20,000
REVIVE OUR HEARTS$20,000
ANGEL MINISTRIES$20,000
CROSSOVER GLOBAL$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
AUGUSTA CARE PREGNANCY$15,000
NORTH AMERICAN MISSION BOARD$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NO LONGER ORPHANS: $5k → 7%NO LONGER ORPHANS: $5k → 7%NO LONGER ORPHANS: $5k → 7%NO LONGER ORPHANS: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
MN
IL
MI
OR
OH
PA
CA
CO
KY
VA
AZ
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.0M · 49 repeat orgs$339k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

49 repeat relationships — 38 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
21

Total granted

$3.0M
$230k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+24%

Still filing today

39%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $109k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsScience & TechFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ASSOCIATES FOR BIBLICAL RESEARCH
    7× · 2018–2024 · $205k · revenue +77%
  • ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM
    8× · 2017–2024 · $190k · revenue +134%
  • CC
    CROSSOVER COMMUNICATIONS INTL
    7× · 2018–2024 · $110k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • CW
    CLEAR WORD MINISTRY
    one grant, 2023 · $40k
  • GC
    GARDEN CITY RESCUE MISSION
    one grant, 2023 · $40k
  • MY
    MISSION YEAR
    one grant, 2017 · $32k · revenue -70%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

2
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry Inc

To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.

3
Mission Without Borders International

The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…

International
4
Probe Ministries International

To present the gospel by providing life-long opportunities to integrate faith and learning through balanced, biblically based scholarship, training people to love god by renewing their minds and equipping the church to engage the world for…

Religion
5
Good News Publishers

Crossway is a not-for-profit Christian publishing ministry of Good News Publishers that exists to proclaim the gospel of Jesus Christ through publishing and other means, in order, by God's grace: to bring people to Christ as their Lord and…

6
Explore God Network
7
Bible Open Air Mission

Purpose is sending individuals around the world to win souls to jesus christ by preaching the gospel evangelism.

Religion
8
God's Bible School College & Missionary Training Home

God's bible school and college seeks to glorify god and to serve his church by providing higher education centered in holy scripture and shaped by wesleyan conviction, thus preparing faithful servants to proclaim jesus christ and spread…

Education
9
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
10
Thru the Bible Inc

The organization produces a 26-minute bible study program that takes the listener through the entire bible in 5 years. the bible study programs air in over 250 languages and dialects and are heard in more than 190 countries, to bring the…

Religion
11
For the Gospel Ministries

Support local churches, leaders, and christians from around the world through online content that strengthens and affirms their life in christ. committed to using every means possible to reach every age and life stage with the gospel…

Religion
12
Tyndale Bible Translators

Bible Translation and acts of Christian Services

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crossover Communications Intl and the most unlike its peers is Museum of the Bible. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Christian Missionary Organi…Community Health CentersHomeless Services & ShelterIndependent K-8 SchoolsPregnancy Support ServicesFood Pantries & AssistanceGovernment Accountability R…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%31%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%31%35–55yr16%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%16%20–35yr13%32%35–55yr16%41%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/36
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,529

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/29
Grantees still filing
21/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

KIOKEE BAPTIST CHURCH — $690,664 · OtherKIOKEE BAPTIST CHURCHIndividual grant recipient — $225,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $107,782 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $101,000 · OtherNORTH AMERICAN MISSION BOARD OF THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTION INC — $88,000 · OtherLOGOI MINISTRIES — $85,000 · OtherREVIVIFY CHURCH — $73,668 · Other+51 more — $818,234 · Other+51 moreCOLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY — $575,000 · EducationCOLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL…ASSOCIATES FOR BIBLICAL RESEARCH — $205,000 · EducationASSOCIATES FOR BIBLICA…CROSSOVER COMMUNICATIONS INTL — $110,000 · ReligionANGEL MINISTRIES — $91,000 · ReligionS W A T MINISTRIES INC — $36,000 · ReligionFAMILY MISSIONS COMPANY — $15,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $10,000 · ReligionEzra Journey — $10,000 · Religion+4 more — $13,200 · ReligionAUGUSTA CARE PREGNANCY CENTER — $185,000 · HealthFIGHTING TO WIN INC — $10,000 · HealthCHRIST COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES AUGUSTA INC — $8,000 · HealthALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM — $190,000 · Civil RightsINSTITUTE FOR CREATION RESEARCH — $162,000 · Science & TechGOLDEN HARVEST FOOD BANK INC — $88,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$2,189,348Education$780,000Religion$285,200Health$203,000Civil Rights$190,000Science & Tech$162,000Food & Nutrition$88,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY — $575,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetASSOCIATES FOR BIBLICAL RESEARCH — $205,000 over 7y, 8.2% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM — $190,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAUGUSTA CARE PREGNANCY CENTER — $185,000 over 8y, 8.8% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR CREATION RESEARCH — $162,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCROSSOVER COMMUNICATIONS INTL — $110,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetANGEL MINISTRIES — $91,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetGOLDEN HARVEST FOOD BANK INC — $88,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetS W A T MINISTRIES INC — $36,000 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetREASONS FOR HOPE INC — $33,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetMISSION YEAR — $32,234 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetUNSHELTERED INTERNATIONAL — $24,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetNo Longer Orphans Inc — $20,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetFAMILY MISSIONS COMPANY — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE BIBLE — $14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEzra Journey — $10,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetCHRIST COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES AUGUSTA INC — $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAKING ENDS MEET BARGAIN CENTER INC — $6,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetMIRACLE MAKING MINISTRIES INC — $5,200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE FATHER'S BUSINESS INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetRADIO TRAINING NETWORK INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL MEDIA OUTREACH — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBoth Hands Foundation — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAUGUSTA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION ADVANCING CREATION TRUTH — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds ASSOCIATES FOR BIBLICAL RESEARCH
  • Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM
  • Who funds AUGUSTA CARE PREGNANCY CENTER
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR CREATION RESEARCH
  • Who funds CROSSOVER COMMUNICATIONS INTL
  • Who funds ANGEL MINISTRIES
  • Who funds GOLDEN HARVEST FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds S W A T MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds REASONS FOR HOPE INC
  • Who funds MISSION YEAR
  • Who funds UNSHELTERED INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds No Longer Orphans Inc
  • Who funds FAMILY MISSIONS COMPANY
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF THE BIBLE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for the Central Savannah River Area IncGA19.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for the Central Savannah River Area Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · South Carolina Christian Foundation · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fivelaps Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · The Bolick Foundation · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · The Signatry Charitable Trust · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Edward Jones Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Azb Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Azb Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Azb Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph