Skip to content

· Private foundation

Aylward Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$424k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$175k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Youth Development$295kEducation$173kReligion$145kAnimals$126kEnvironment$110kPhilanthropy$100kHealth$60kPublic Benefit$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $168k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $225k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$5.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RAWHIDE- OPERATING$175,000
THE GARDEN CLUB OF PALM BEACH$50,000
TREES FOR TOMORROW$40,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NEENAH$35,000
WAYLAND ACADEMY$27,500
HSPPR- HUMANE SOCIETY OF PIKES$25,000
UNITED WAY PALM BEACH$10,000
CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN ZOO$10,000
UNITED WAY OF FOX CITIES$10,000
HAZELDEN$10,000
SAN LUIS VALLEY ANIMAL WELFARE$7,500
SAFE PLACE FOR PETS$7,500
HUMANE SOCIETY OF PAGOSA SPRINGS$7,500
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES$5,000
SALVATION ARMY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%COLORADO SPRINGS CHILD NURSERY CENTERS INC: $20k → 9%SAFE PLACE FOR PETS: $8k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 20 repeat orgs$171k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
7

Total granted

$1.0M
$103k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+25%

Still filing today

50%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $68k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEducationEnvironmentArts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WA
    WAYLAND ACADEMY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $68k · revenue +49%
  • TG
    THE GARDEN CLUB OF PALM BEACH INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $55k · revenue +63%
  • TREES FOR TOMORROW INC
    2× · 2021–2024 · $55k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION
    one grant, 2021 · $28k · revenue +16%
  • CS
    COLORADO SPRINGS CHILD NURSERY CENTERS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +38%
  • FN
    FUTURE NEENAH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +53%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
2
Naples Zoo Inc

Naples zoo is accredited by the american zoo & aquarium association (aza) and has numerous animal exhibits placed on its 45-acre site. (continued on schedule o)each exhibit is unique and designed to simulate typical conditions for the…

Animals
3
Financial Planning Association

To elevate the profession that transforms lives through the power of financial planning.

Community Improvement
4
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
5
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
6
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
7
Women's Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc

As america's first animal shelter, founded in 1869, women's humane society dba women's animal center (wac), assists people in the community, saves the lives of animals, and improves the health of pets through its shelter and adoptions…

Animals
8
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
9
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
10
Wings Over the Rockies Air & Space Museum

The organization's mission is to educate and inspire people of all ages about aviation and space endeavors of the past, present, and future.

Arts & Culture
11
Simpson College

Through innovative learning opportunities, individual student attention, and an unwavering commitment to inclusive educational access, simpson college cultivates a diverse community of learners to lead lives of meaning and purpose.

Education
12
Zoological Society of Pittsburgh

The zoological society of pittsburgh is dedicated to being a leader in, and significant contributor to, the conservation of endangered and threatened species. the society provides an enjoyable family experience that fosters understanding,…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Eaa Aviation Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Smithsonian Institution. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RAWHIDE- OPERATING: $215,000 · OtherRAWHIDE- OPERATINGST THOMAS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $145,000 · OtherST THOMAS EPISCOPAL CHURCHLAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $60,000 · OtherLAWRENCE UNIVERSITYHSPPR- HUMANE SOCIETY OF PIKES: $50,000 · OtherHSPPR- HUMANE SOCIETY OF PIKESUNITED WAY PALM BEACH: $50,000 · OtherUNITED WAY PALM BEACHRAWHIDE INC: $45,000 · OtherRAWHIDE INCBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NEENAH: $35,000 · OtherHAZELDEN: $30,000 · OtherALS ASSOCIATION: $30,000 · Other+8 more: $105,500 · Other+8 moreTHE GARDEN CLUB OF PALM BEACH INC: $55,000 · EnvironmentTHE GARDEN …TREES FOR TOMORROW INC: $55,000 · EnvironmentTREES FOR T…FUTURE NEENAH INC: $15,000 · EnvironmentFUTURE NEEN…WAYLAND ACADEMY: $67,500 · EducationWAYLAND AC…THE UWO FOX CITIES FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · EducationTHE UWO FO…RIPON COLLEGE: $15,000 · EducationRIPON COLL…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SI…HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION: $28,000 · AnimalsINTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF PAGOSA SPRINGS: $7,500 · AnimalsPEPPERS SENIOR DOG SANCTUARY: $5,000 · AnimalsTHREE EAGLE TRAIL FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Public BenefitUNITED WAY FOX CITIES INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyCOLORADO SPRINGS CHILD NURSERY CENTERS INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesSAFE PLACE INC: $7,500 · Human Services
Other$765,500Environment$125,000Education$112,500Animals$50,500Public Benefit$50,000Philanthropy$50,000Human Services$27,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWAYLAND ACADEMY: $67,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE GARDEN CLUB OF PALM BEACH INC: $55,000 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetTREES FOR TOMORROW INC: $55,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetTHREE EAGLE TRAIL FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 2y, 38% of budgetUNITED WAY FOX CITIES INC: $50,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetRAWHIDE INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION: $28,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLORADO SPRINGS CHILD NURSERY CENTERS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE UWO FOX CITIES FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 4y, 6.9% of budgetFUTURE NEENAH INC: $15,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetRIPON COLLEGE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF PAGOSA SPRINGS: $7,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSAFE PLACE INC: $7,500 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetPEPPERS SENIOR DOG SANCTUARY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEAA AVIATION FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WAYLAND ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds THE GARDEN CLUB OF PALM BEACH INC ↗
  • Who funds TREES FOR TOMORROW INC ↗
  • Who funds THREE EAGLE TRAIL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY FOX CITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds RAWHIDE INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO SPRINGS CHILD NURSERY CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UWO FOX CITIES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FUTURE NEENAH INC ↗
  • Who funds RIPON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF PAGOSA SPRINGS ↗
  • Who funds SAFE PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds PEPPERS SENIOR DOG SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds EAA AVIATION FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region IncWI15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Oshkosh Area Community Foundation Corporation · El Pomar Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Aylward Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Aylward Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Aylward Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph