Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Avina Americas Inc

Organization's mission: to promote sustainable development in latin america and globally.

$11M
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

International$1.7MEmployment$777kCivil Rights$744kArts & Culture$239kPhilanthropy$61kHuman Services$50kSocial Science$40kCrime & Legal$28kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 6 grants below total $440,777 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $10,968,934 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $10,528,157 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $62k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $120k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$52,894
Median grant
5
States reached
$60M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DEVELOPMENTEXCOM INC$250,000
CENTRO DE LOS DERECHOS DEL MIGRANTE INC$67,000
CIERTO$52,894
BUSINESS & HUMAN RIGHTS RESOURCE CENTRE$44,000
GLOBAL EXCHANGE$18,000
TRIPLE CROWN RESULTS LLC$8,883
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $165k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%REMAKE: $75k → 10%WOMEN'S REFUGEE COMMISSION (WRC): $50k → 17%WOMEN'S REFUGEE COMMISSION (WRC): $40k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
CA
VA
MD
DC
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $10M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 7 regions, $10M to organizations and $361k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

South America$5.7M · 55% · 35 grants · 7 people

Stated purpose: BIOMES · CLIMATE · DEMOCRACIES

Central America and the Caribbean$2.3M · 22% · 20 grants · 2 people

Stated purpose: CLIMATE · DEMOCRACIES · LABOR INNOVATION

North America (Canada and Mexico)$1.6M · 15% · 32 grants · 10 people

Stated purpose: DEMOCRACIES · LABOR INNOVATION · RECYCLING

East Asia and the Pacific$321k · 3% · 6 grants

Stated purpose: BIOMES · CLIMATE · LABOR INNOVATION

Sub-Saharan Africa$255k · 2% · 6 grants · 3 people

Stated purpose: LABOR INNOVATION · CLIMATE

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$197k · 2% · 3 grants · 1 person

Stated purpose: LABOR INNOVATION · RECYCLING

South Asia$50k · 0% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: LABOR INNOVATION

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 10 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
24

Total granted

$1.4M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+49%

Still filing today

80%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $268k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalCivil RightsCrime & LegalEmploymentArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PG
    PANORAMA GLOBAL
    2× · 2022–2023 · $175k · revenue +50%
  • C
    CIERTO
    3× · 2021–2024 · $163k · revenue +123%
  • VI
    VERITE INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $152k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • IL
    INTERNATIONAL LABOR RIGHTS FORUM
    one grant, 2020 · $220k · revenue -11%
  • AC
    AMERICAN CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL LABOR SOLIDARITYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $150k · revenue +140%
  • MP
    MIGRATION POLICY INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue -11%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indigenous Peoples Rights Inc

To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.

Human Services
2
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
3
Guernica Centre for InternationalJustice

The Guernica Centre for International Justice represents the interests of victims in national and international legal proceedings, putting in place transnational accountability strategies that seek to maximize the protection of victims'…

International
4
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
5
World Coffee Research

World coffee research unites the global coffee industry to drive science-based agricultural solutions to urgently secure a diverse and sustainable supply of quality coffee today and for generations to come. our mission is to grow, protect,…

International
6
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
7
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International
8
The International Refugee Rights Initiative

To enhance the protection of rights of the displaced worldwide by the provision of advice and assistance on the application of international law, the conducting of research on the interpretation and application of international law and the…

—
9
Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide

Educational & charitable. to provide legal and scientific information to public interest attorneys and scientists in numerous countries.

—
10
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
11
National Immigration Forum

The forum advocates for the value of immigrants and immigration to the nation. from a diversity of perspectives, the forum uses communication, advocacy and policy to create a vision, concensus and strategy to lead to a better, more…

—
12
Human Rights Watch Inc

Human rights watch ("hrw") defends the rights of people worldwide. we scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. human rights watch is an independent,…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centro De Los Derechos Del Migrante Inc and the most unlike its peers is American University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%4%<5yr14%4%5–10yr18%30%10–20yr18%41%20–35yr16%19%35–55yr15%4%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%5%<5yr14%6%5–10yr18%42%10–20yr18%34%20–35yr16%13%35–55yr15%1%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/36
the rest of the field
12%
1,600/12,965

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
20/30
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CENTRO DE LOS DERECHOS DEL MIGRANTE INC — $313,000 · OtherCENTRO DE LOS DERECHOS DEL MIGRANTE IN…DEVELOPMENTEXCOM INC — $250,000 · OtherDEVELOPMENTEXCOM INCAMERICAN CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL LABOR SOLIDARITY — $150,000 · OtherAMERICAN CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL LABO…CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL RIGHTS INC — $150,000 · OtherCENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL RIGHTS …LINA SRIVASTAVA CONSULTING LLC — $50,000 · OtherORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES (INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS) — $50,000 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR CULTURAL POWER — $50,000 · Other+11 more — $240,601 · Other+11 moreNEW VENTURE FUND — $864,958 · EnvironmentNEW VENTURE FUNDINTERNATIONAL LABOR RIGHTS FORUM — $220,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL LABOR RI…PANORAMA GLOBAL — $175,000 · InternationalPANORAMA GLOBALAlianza Americas — $148,000 · InternationalAlianza AmericasWASHINGTON OFFICE ON LATIN AMERICA — $75,000 · InternationalWASHINGTON OFFICE ON L…LATIN AMERICA WORKING GROUP EDUCATION FUND — $50,000 · InternationalLATIN AMERICA WORKING …+4 more — $65,253 · International+4 moreCIERTO — $162,999 · EmploymentCIERTOBUSINESS AND HUMAN RIGHTS RESOURCE CENTRE — $140,205 · EmploymentBUSINESS …VERITE INC — $152,000 · Arts & CultureBOREALIS PHILANTHROPY — $37,000 · Arts & CultureMIGRATION POLICY INSTITUTE — $100,000 · Civil RightsWORKER RIGHTS CONSORTIUM INC — $75,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZING NETWORK — $12,000 · Civil RightsWOMEN'S REFUGEE COMMISSION INC — $90,000 · Human ServicesRemake — $75,000 · Human Services
Other$1,253,601Environment$864,958International$733,253Employment$303,204Arts & Culture$189,000Civil Rights$187,000Human Services$165,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $864,958 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRO DE LOS DERECHOS DEL MIGRANTE INC — $313,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetINTERNATIONAL LABOR RIGHTS FORUM — $220,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetPANORAMA GLOBAL — $175,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCIERTO — $162,999 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetVERITE INC — $152,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL LABOR SOLIDARITY — $150,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL RIGHTS INC — $150,000 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetAlianza Americas — $148,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetBUSINESS AND HUMAN RIGHTS RESOURCE CENTRE — $140,205 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetMIGRATION POLICY INSTITUTE — $100,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetWOMEN'S REFUGEE COMMISSION INC — $90,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetWORKER RIGHTS CONSORTIUM INC — $75,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetWASHINGTON OFFICE ON LATIN AMERICA — $75,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetRemake — $75,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR CULTURAL POWER — $50,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetLATIN AMERICA WORKING GROUP EDUCATION FUND — $50,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetHISPANICS IN PHILANTHROPY — $41,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWOODROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SCHOLARS — $40,363 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBOREALIS PHILANTHROPY — $37,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASYLUM ACCESS — $22,253 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCRISTOSAL INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGLOBAL EXCHANGE — $18,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetKIND INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTER-AMERICAN DIALOGUE — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $13,814 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASOCIACION INTERAMERICANA PARA LA DEFENSA DEL AMBIENTE — $12,968 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZING NETWORK — $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJUSTICE IN MOTION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation to Promote…The Ford FoundationOpen Society InstituteHumanity UnitedRockefeller Philanthr…Tides FoundationAmalgamated Charitabl…Hispanics in Philanth…John D and Catherine …NEO Philanthropy IncHumanity United ActionThe Freedom Fund
Foundation to Promote Open SocietyNY31.3× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation to Promote Open Society · The Ford Foundation · Open Society Institute · Humanity United · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Tides Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Hispanics in Philanthropy · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Humanity United Action · The Freedom Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Avina Americas Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 19%
  • Verite Inc — 19% of income from government
  • Centro De Los Derechos Del Migrante Inc — 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Avina Americas Inc?

Find your warmest path to Avina Americas Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines