Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Austin Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$85k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Religion$203kHuman Services$120kHealth$33kHousing & Shelter$26kEducation$19kCrime & Legal$8kPhilanthropy$2kFood & Nutrition$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$974k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN$35,000
ABARA INC$20,000
OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES$20,000
INSPIRATION MINISTRIES$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $20k → 7%OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $20k → 7%AGAPE HOUSE: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$403k · 9 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
11

Total granted

$403k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+14%

Still filing today

78%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OC
    OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES
    2× · 2024–2025 · $40k · revenue +16%
  • CL
    CHRISTIAN LEAGUE FOR THE HANDICAPPED DBA INSPIRATION MINISTRIES
    5× · 2020–2025 · $31k · revenue +59%
  • FC
    FAITH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $16k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • GC
    GENEVA CAMPUS CHURCH INC
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • AGAPE HOUSE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -5%
  • LG
    LAKE GENEVA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +56%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Olivet University

Providing guality Christian education to the network generation

Education
2
Charis Bible College Inc

Charis Bible Colleges, Inc. (CBC) was established to train and equip individuals to carry out the Gospel of Jesus Christ through practical application through mentoring, training, and teaching.

Religion
3
A Christian Food Pantry Inc

Serve food to families and individuals in need.

4
Cedar Lake Ministries

Cedar lake ministries exist to provide a life changing environment for evangelism and spiritual growth.

5
Cross (Christians Reaching Out in Social Services)

The organization provides direct assistance and support services to residents of champlin, corcoran, dayton, maple grove, osseo and rogers, mn targeting households with low incomes and those faced with financial crisis.

Religion
6
Christian Healthcare Ministries Inc

To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.

Religion
7
Feed the Hunger Inc

Feeding the spiritual and physical hunger, especially in at-risk children.

8
Crawford Christian Academy

Christian day school with pre-k thru 12

Education
9
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
10
Agape Schools

Religious preschool and daycare services

Human Services
11
Lakelight Institute

Lakelight Institute equips Christians with timeless wisdom for modern life.

Religion
12
Welch College

Welch college is a christian higher education institution that educates leaders to serve christ, his church, and his world through biblical thought and life

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Faith Christian School Inc and the most unlike its peers is New Day Women's Clinic Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GRACE EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH — $160,000 · OtherGRACE EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCHSAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN — $127,375 · OtherSAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDRENCHRISTIAN LEAGUE FOR THE HANDICAPPED DBA INSPIRATION MINISTRIES — $31,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN LEAGUE FOR THE HANDICAPPED DBA INSPIRATION MINISTRIES+6 more — $4,325 · OtherOUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES — $40,000 · Human ServicesOUTREACH CO…+2 more — $1,300 · Human ServicesABARA INC — $25,000 · Housing & ShelterFAITH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC — $16,000 · EducationWheaton College — $2,000 · Education+1 more — $500 · EducationNEW DAY WOMEN'S CLINIC INC — $1,500 · HealthHOPE STREET MINISTRY INC — $500 · HealthCLAPHAM SCHOOL — $500 · HealthCHILDRENS WORLD IMPACT INC — $2,200 · PhilanthropyLAKE GENEVA FOUNDATION — $1,000 · Religion
Other$322,700Human Services$41,300Housing & Shelter$25,000Education$18,500Health$2,500Philanthropy$2,200Religion$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES — $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHRISTIAN LEAGUE FOR THE HANDICAPPED DBA INSPIRATION MINISTRIES — $31,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetABARA INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFAITH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC — $16,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCHILDRENS WORLD IMPACT INC — $2,200 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetWheaton College — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW DAY WOMEN'S CLINIC INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAGAPE HOUSE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLAKE GENEVA FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE STREET MINISTRY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCLAPHAM SCHOOL — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY WAREHOUSE INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPENINSULA PLAYERS THEATRE FOUNDATION INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kunes Family FoundationWI19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kunes Family Foundation · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Austin Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Austin Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Austin Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph