Skip to content
Aurora Integrated Oncology Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Aurora Integrated Oncology Foundation

Improve the oncology experience by ensuring access to state-of-the-art cancer services, alleviating financial burdens and fostering collaboration to improve cancer outcomes for all Alaskans.

$522k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 19 grants below total $324,100, the rows itemized in this filing. The $521,851 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $197,751 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $222k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$285M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALASKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$55,000
ALASKA RUN FOR WOMEN$40,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$35,000
HEALTHY ALASKA NATIVES FOUNDATION$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FOUNDATION$20,000
SOLDOTNA PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS$20,000
ALASKA STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION$15,000
BCDC OF AK$15,000
PROVIDENCE ALASKA FOUNDATION$12,000
CANCER CONNECTION$10,000
ANCHORAGE NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INC$10,000
10 CHEFS INC$10,000
ARMED SERVICES YMCA OF ALASKA$10,000
ALASKA STATE FAIR INC$8,600
BRIDGES COMMUNITY RESOURCE NETWORK INC$8,500
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 48% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%WASILLA AREA SENIORS INC: $8k → 10%HOSPICE OF ANCHORAGE: $7k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alaska Nurses Association

To improve health standards,foster high standards for nurses and to promote the profession of nursing

—
2
Alaska Rural Electric Cooperative Association Educational Foundation Inc
Environment
3
Alaska Childrens Alliance

Dedicated to strengthening the multi-disciplinary response to child abuse. We strive to ensure that professionals throughout Alaska are equipped to do the best job possible at holding offenders accountable and helping children and families…

Crime & Legal
4
Peninsula Community Health Services of Alaska

Strengthening the community by providing accessible and affordable health care.

Health
5
Alaska Trails

Building partnerships, building trails. Working to build trails across the state and build capacity for trail organizations.

Recreation & Sports
6
Alaska Farmers Market Association

to promote, support and advocate for Alaska agriculture

Education
7
Alaska Native Health Board

The mission of the alaska native health board is to promote the spiritual, physical, mental, social, and cultural well-being and pride of alaska native people.

—
8
Blood Bank of Alaska Inc

The blood bank provides blood products and testing services to hospitals to ensure an adequate and safe supply of blood in routine and emergency situations. it provides educational services to potential donors and recipients of blood…

Health
9
Alaska Dental Society

to advocate for and provide education to the dental health providers community.

—
10
Alaska Health Fair Inc

Public health screening and education to promote statewide health education and medical screenings. we do health fairs throughout the state of alaska providing health education and preventative screenings.

Health
11
Alaska E-Health Network Inc dba Healthconnect Alaska

To improve the safety, cost effectiveness, and quality of healthcare in alaska through widespread secure, confidential electronic clinical information systems including promotion of electronic health records and facilitation of health…

Public Benefit
12
Bristol Bay Area Health Corporation

To provide health care with competence and sensitivity.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healthy Alaska Natives Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Bridges Community Resource Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
4/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $35,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCHEALTHY ALASKA NATIVES FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthHEALTHY ALASKA NATIVES FOUNDATIONPROVIDENCE ALASKA FOUNDATION: $12,000 · HealthPROVIDENCE ALASKA FOUNDATIONANCHORAGE NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INC: $10,000 · HealthANCHORAGE NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENT…Cancer Connection: $10,000 · HealthCancer ConnectionVALLEY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION INC DBA MAT-SU HEALTH FOUNDATION: $8,000 · HealthVALLEY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION INC DB…The Alaska Community Foundation: $55,000 · PhilanthropyThe Alaska Community Foun…10 Chefs Inc: $10,000 · Philanthropy10 Chefs IncBRIDGES COMMUNITY RESOURCE NETWORK INC: $8,500 · PhilanthropyBRIDGES COMMUNITY RESOURC…SOLDOTNA PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS: $20,000 · OtherSOLDOTNA PROFESSIONAL F…Breast Cancer Detection Center of Alaska and Charitable Corp: $15,000 · OtherBreast Cancer Detection…ALASKA STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · OtherALASKA STATE MEDICAL AS…ARMED SERVICES YMCA OF ALASKA: $10,000 · OtherARMED SERVICES YMCA OF …Alaska Hospital & Healthcare Association: $7,500 · OtherAlaska Hospital & Healt…Alaska Run for Women: $40,000 · Human ServicesAlaska Run for Wome…Wasilla Area Seniors Inc: $7,500 · Human ServicesWasilla Area Senior…ANCHORAGE HOSPICE INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesANCHORAGE HOSPICE I…UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationALASKA STATE FAIR INC: $8,600 · Recreation & Sports
Health$100,000Philanthropy$73,500Other$67,500Human Services$54,500Education$20,000Recreation & Sports$8,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Alaska Community Foundation: $55,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAlaska Run for Women: $40,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHY ALASKA NATIVES FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBreast Cancer Detection Center of Alaska and Charitable Corp: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetALASKA STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetPROVIDENCE ALASKA FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANCHORAGE NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCancer Connection: $10,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budget10 Chefs Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetALASKA STATE FAIR INC: $8,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRIDGES COMMUNITY RESOURCE NETWORK INC: $8,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetVALLEY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION INC DBA MAT-SU HEALTH FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWasilla Area Seniors Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAlaska Hospital & Healthcare Association: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetANCHORAGE HOSPICE INC: $7,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rasmuson FoundationThe Alaska Community …United Way of Anchora…Valley Hospital Assoc…Providence Health & S…Charities Aid Foundat…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Rasmuson FoundationAK27.6× affinity11 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rasmuson Foundation · The Alaska Community Foundation · United Way of Anchorage · Valley Hospital Association Inc Dba Mat-Su Health Foundation · Providence Health & Services - Washington · Charities Aid Foundation America · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Aurora Integrated Oncology Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Aurora Integrated Oncology Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Aurora Integrated Oncology Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Aurora Integrated Oncology Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Aurora Integrated Oncology’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home