Skip to content

Tennessee · Public charity

Aurora Integrated Oncology Foundation

Improve the oncology experience by ensuring access to state-of-the-art cancer services, alleviating financial burdens and fostering collaboration to improve cancer outcomes for all Alaskans.

$522k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
19
Itemized grants FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$324k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$55,000
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$285M

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2024 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 18 grantees
All grantees of Aurora Integrated Oncology Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Alaska Run for Women$40,000110%
American Cancer Society Inc$35,00010%
Healthy Alaska Natives Foundation$25,00013%
Soldotna Professional Firefighters$20,0001n/a
University of Alaska Foundation$20,00010%
Breast Cancer Detection Center of Alaska and Charitable Corp$15,00011%
Alaska State Medical Association$15,00013%
Providence Alaska Foundation$12,00010%
Anchorage Neighborhood Health Center Inc$10,00010%
Cancer Connection$10,00016%
Armed Services YMCA of Alaska$10,0001n/a
10 Chefs Inc$10,00012%
Alaska State Fair Inc$8,60010%
Bridges Community Resource Network Inc$8,50010%
Valley Hospital Association Inc Dba Mat-Su Health Foundation$8,00010%
Wasilla Area Seniors Inc$7,50010%
Alaska Hospital & Healthcare Association$7,50010%
Anchorage Hospice Inc$7,00011%

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Aurora Integrated Oncology Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAlaska Run for Women: $40,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetAmerican Cancer Society Inc: $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHealthy Alaska Natives Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetUniversity of Alaska Foundation: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBreast Cancer Detection Center of Alaska and Charitable Corp: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAlaska State Medical Association: $15,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetProvidence Alaska Foundation: $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAnchorage Neighborhood Health Center Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCancer Connection: $10,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budget10 Chefs Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetAlaska State Fair Inc: $8,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBridges Community Resource Network Inc: $8,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetValley Hospital Association Inc Dba Mat-Su Health Foundation: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWasilla Area Seniors Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAlaska Hospital & Healthcare Association: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAnchorage Hospice Inc: $7,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 16.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rasmuson FoundationAK27.6× affinity11 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rasmuson Foundation · The Alaska Community Foundation · United Way of Anchorage · Valley Hospital Association Inc Dba Mat-Su Health Foundation · Providence Health & Services - Washington · Charities Aid Foundation America · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Aurora Integrated Oncology Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Aurora Integrated Oncology Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Aurora Integrated Oncology Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Aurora Integrated Oncology Foundation

How much does Aurora Integrated Oncology Foundation give?
Aurora Integrated Oncology Foundation reported 19 itemized grants totaling $324,100, out of $521,851 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing.
What does Aurora Integrated Oncology Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2024 to FY2024, its largest causes are Health (58%), Education (17%), Recreation & Sports (9%).
Who are Aurora Integrated Oncology Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2024 to FY2024: Alaska Run for Women ($40k), American Cancer Society Inc ($35k), Healthy Alaska Natives Foundation ($25k).
Which funders back the same organizations as Aurora Integrated Oncology Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Rasmuson Foundation, The Alaska Community Foundation, United Way of Anchorage.
Where is Aurora Integrated Oncology Foundation based?
Aurora Integrated Oncology Foundation is based in TN.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Aurora Integrated Oncology’s filings →

More from the funding graph