Skip to content

· Private foundation

Auerbach Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$710k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$237k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$516kHealth$250kHuman Services$128kArts & Culture$48kReligion$21kPublic Benefit$18kEducation$11kEnvironment$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$236,757
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
J KEITH AUERBACH AND LYNN WALKER SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND$236,758
RRAUERBACHCANDYRIFICCOM SCHWAB DONOR-ADVISED FUND$236,757
PENNY AND JEAN FRIEDBERG CHARITABLE FUND$236,757
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $4k → 12%ST MARY'S CENTER: $1k → 15%ST MARY'S CENTER: $1k → 15%ST MARY'S CENTER: $1k → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $2k → 15%CEDAR LAKE FOUNDATION: $2k → 15%CEDAR LAKE FOUNDATION: $2k → 15%CEDAR LAKE FOUNDATION: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
NY
MA
PA
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
KS
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

22%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$214k · 46 repeat orgs$747k to everyone else

46 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 46 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
18

Total granted

$214k
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+15%

Still filing today

61%
72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $710k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureInternationalEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JUDICIAL WATCH INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $17k · revenue +40%
  • KP
    KENTUCKY PUBLIC RADIO INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $8k · revenue +30%
  • CL
    CEDAR LAKE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $6k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION OF HOWARD CO
    one grant, 2017 · $22k
  • TB
    THE BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue +47%
  • TF
    The Food Literacy Project at Oxmoor Farm Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +133%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
3
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
4
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement
5
Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy
6
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
7
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
8
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
9
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
10
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
11
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
12
Jewelers of America Inc

Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Guthy-Jackson Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/44
Grantees still filing
30/44
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

J KEITH AUERBACH AND LYNN WALKER SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND: $236,758 · OtherJ KEITH AUERBACH AND LYNN WALKER SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUNDRRAUERBACHCANDYRIFICCOM SCHWAB DONOR-ADVISED FUND: $236,757 · OtherRRAUERBACHCANDYRIFICCOM SCHWAB DONOR-ADVISED FUNDPENNY AND JEAN FRIEDBERG CHARITABLE FUND: $236,757 · OtherPENNY AND JEAN FRIEDBERG CHARITABLE FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $49,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+39 more: $129,834 · Other+39 moreJEWISH COMMUNITY OF LOUISVILLE INC: $121,633 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMU…KENTUCKY PUBLIC RADIO INC: $8,000 · Arts & CultureFUND FOR THE ARTS INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureSPEED ART MUSEUM: $3,000 · Arts & CultureART SANCTUARY: $2,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $1,500 · Arts & CultureHONESTREPORTINGCOM INC: $1,500 · Arts & CultureSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $1,500 · Arts & CultureALGEMEINER INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureTHE KENTUCKY SCIENCE CENTER INC: $1,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $250 · Arts & CultureJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $16,500 · Public BenefitORGANIC CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION: $2,800 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1,500 · Public BenefitCEDAR LAKE FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesTHE BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $4,000 · Human ServicesSMC REGINA'S CENTER: $3,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesSPALDING UNIVERSITY INC: $3,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $1,750 · EducationPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,500 · EducationGATESTONE INSTITUTE: $1,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $300 · Education+1 more: $250 · EducationWESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $4,500 · HealthTIP IT FORWARD: $3,000 · Health
Other$889,106Philanthropy$121,633Arts & Culture$22,750Public Benefit$20,800Human Services$15,500Education$8,300Health$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY OF LOUISVILLE INC: $121,633 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $16,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKENTUCKY PUBLIC RADIO INC: $8,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCEDAR LAKE FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HEALING PLACE INC: $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRIVER FIELDS INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetWESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL VACCINE INFORMATION CENTER: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLouisville Grows Incorporated: $3,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSPALDING UNIVERSITY INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFUND FOR THE ARTS INC: $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSMC REGINA'S CENTER: $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTIP IT FORWARD: $3,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSPEED ART MUSEUM: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetORGANIC CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION: $2,800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $2,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetART SANCTUARY: $2,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $1,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Food Literacy Project at Oxmoor Farm Inc: $1,540 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHONESTREPORTINGCOM INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGATESTONE INSTITUTE: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAHAD - IN UNUM INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALGEMEINER INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KENTUCKY SCIENCE CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDDLE EAST FORUM: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GUTHY-JACKSON CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARY BYRON PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWashington and Lee University: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH WOMEN'S ARCHIVE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY OF LOUISVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds KENTUCKY PUBLIC RADIO INC ↗
  • Who funds CEDAR LAKE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HEALING PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVER FIELDS INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL VACCINE INFORMATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Louisville Grows Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds SPALDING UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds FUND FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds SMC REGINA'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TIP IT FORWARD ↗
  • Who funds SPEED ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds ORGANIC CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds ART SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds The Food Literacy Project at Oxmoor Farm Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Gheens Foundation IncKY28× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Gheens Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · Snowy Owl Foundation Inc · Republic Bank Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · Charles L Weisberg Family Foundation · LG&E and Ku Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Clifton Foundation Inc · James Graham Brown Foundation Inc · W L Lyons Brown Foundation · Brown-Forman Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Auerbach Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Auerbach Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Auerbach Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph